No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Positioning Urban Anthropology: A Road Map for a History of Ideas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstracts
Anthropological research in urban contexts reflects the fundamental mutations in social sciences. The boundaries between the traditional academic disciplines have become blurred. New clusters of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research emerge. These changes involve risks and chances. Philosophy of science insists on clear concepts and terminologies. Does it make sense to use the term ‘urban anthropology’? If new disciplines or sub-disciplines arise, they should have distinct shapes, and the nomenclature should reflect their scientific profile. Starting from a diachronic comparative analysis of anthropological theories and methodologies this article proposes a road map for heuristic and epistemological investigations of anthropological research in an increasingly urbanized world.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © ICPHS 2018
References
Adorno, ThW (1976) Einleitung. In: É Durkheim, Soziologie und Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–44.Google Scholar
Ansari, G, Nas, PJM, eds (1983) Town-Talk: The Dynamics of Urban Anthropology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barnes, HE (1948) William Isaac Thomas: the fusion of psychological and cultural sociology. In: Barnes, HE (ed.) An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 793–804.Google Scholar
Barth, F, Gingrich, A, Parkin, R, Silverman, S (2005) One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French, and American Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (2011) Preface. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. ix–xvi.Google Scholar
Fox, RG (1977) Urban Anthropology: Cities in Their Cultural Settings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gellner, E (1988) ‘Zeno of Cracow’ or ‘Revolution at Nemi’ or ‘The Polish revenge: a drama in three acts’. In: Ellen, R et al. (eds) Malinowski between Two Worlds: The Polish Roots of an Anthropological Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–194.Google Scholar
Gingrich, A (2010) Transitions: notes on sociocultural anthropology's present and its transnational potential, American Anthropologist, 112(4): 552–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutkind, PCW (1983) New directions in urban anthropology. In: Ansari, G, Nas, PJM (eds) Town-Talk: The Dynamics of Urban Anthropology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hann, C (2005) Foreword. In: F Barth, A Gingrich, R Parkin, and S Silverman, One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French, and American Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. vii–ix.Google Scholar
Hannerz, U (1980) Exploring the City: Inquiries Toward an Urban Anthropology. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, GWF (1970 [1821]) Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Theorie Werkausgabe, vol. 7. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, W (1994) Freiheitsdialektik und Intersubjektivität in Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, W (2008) Universalität der Vernunft, Pluralität der Religionen: Indien und Europa. In: Nagl-Docekal, H, Kaltenbacher, W, Nagl, L (eds) Viele Religionen – eine Vernunft? Ein Disput zu Hegel. Wien: Böhlau; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 265–280.Google Scholar
Kaltenbacher, W (2011) Che cosa è la filosofia interculturale? Cirpit Review, 2, Supplement to the Proceedings, March 2011, pp. 11–16. http://www.raimonpanikkar.it/upload/allegati/60.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A (1999) Among the Anthropologists: History and Context in Anthropology. London-New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, C (1956) The Kalela Dance: Aspects of Social Relationships among Urban Africans in Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pardo, I, Prato, GB (2012) Introduction: the contemporary significance of anthropology in the city. In: Pardo, I, Prato, GB (eds) Anthropology in the City: Methodology and Theory. Farnham: Ashgate (now published by Routledge), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Park, RE (1904) Masse und Publikum: Eine methodologische und soziologische Untersuchung. Bern: Lack & Grunau.Google Scholar
Prato, GB, Pardo, I (2013) Urban anthropology, Urbanities 3(2): 80–110. http://www.anthrojournal-urbanities.com/journal5/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Richards, A (1939) Land, Labour and Diet in Northern Rhodesia: An Economic Study of the Bemba Tribe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rollwagen, JR (1991) Urban Anthropology (the journal): a personal history, Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 20(4): 361–372.Google Scholar
Simmel, G (2006 [1903]) Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Southall, A (1983) Towards a universal urban anthropology. In: Ansari, G, Nas, PJM (eds) Town-Talk: The Dynamics of Urban Anthropology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tönnies, F (1963 [1887]) Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar