Skip to main content
Log in

Reasons To Be Ethical: Self-Interest and Ethical Business

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the self-interested reasons that businesses can have for ethical behaviour. It distinguishes between economic and non-economic reasons and, among the latter, notes those connected with the self-esteem of managers. It offers a detailed typology of prudential reasons for ethical behaviour, laying particular stress on those to do with avoiding punishment by society for wrongdoing and, more particularly still, stresses the role of campaigning pressure groups within that particular category of reasons. It goes on to suggest that because of their occupation of the moral high ground, campaigning groups are well placed to damage the self-esteem of managers and that this is why those groups seem able to exert an influence that goes beyond their somewhat limited capacity to inflict economic damage upon businesses. The paper concludes with the suggestion that we may be witnessing a “virtuous spiral” whereby rising public expectations of morality in business lead to ever increasing moral commitments by business that then cause those expectations to rise still further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrie, C.: 1997, ‘Campaigning Shareholders Attack BAe Arms Sales’, Guardian, May 1, p. 26.

  • Bentham, J.: 1970, Of Laws in General, ed. H.L.A. Hart (Athlone Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. (ed.): 1997, No Hiding Place (Control Risks Group, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K.: 1999, ‘Approval of Business in Britain at 30-Year Low’, Financial Times, February 22, p. 18.

  • Business in the Community: 1992, Annual Review (BITC, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssides, G. and J. Kaler: 1993, An Introduction to Business Ethics (International Thomson Business Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssides, G. and J. Kaler: 1996, Essentials of Business Ethics (McGraw-Hill, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, C. M. V. and H. M. Keating: 1994, Criminal Law: Text and Materials (Sweet & Maxwell, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M.: 1998, ‘Evidence of a New Environmental Ethic: Assessing the Trend Towards Investor and Consumer Activism’, in I. Jones and M. G. Pollit (eds.), The Role of Business Ethics in Economic Performance (Macmillan, London), pp. 111–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J.: 1994, ‘The Development of Ethical Investment Products’, in A. R. Prindl and B. Prodam (eds.), Ethical Conflicts in Finance (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 213–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echiejile, I.: 1995, ‘The Business Case for Diversity’, Professional Manager ( July), 8–11.

  • Griffiths, A. and S. Wall (eds.): 1995, Applied Economics (Longman, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O.: 1970, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascelles, D. et al.: 1995, ‘Brent Spar Dents Oil Giant's Pride Rather Than its Profits’, Financial Times, June 10, p. 13.

  • Martinson, J.: 1999, ‘Byers Warns Over Executive Pay’, Financial Times, March 24, p. 10.

  • Price, A.: 1997, ‘In Search of Legitimisation-Payback and Practice’, in G. Moore (ed.), Business Ethics: Principle and Practice (Business Education Publishers, Sunderland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M.: 1999, ‘Wide Open to the Web Warriors’, on http://www.marketing.haynet.com (from Marketing, February 4).

  • Singer, P.: 1979, Practical Ethics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.: 1994, The Moral Problem (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1990, Morality and the Market (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, R.: 1998, ‘The Challenge of Ethical Investment: Activism, Assets and Analysis’, in I. Jones and M. Pollitt (eds.), The Role of Ethics in Economic Performance (Macmillan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw, J.: 1989, Equal Opportunities: The Way Ahead (Institute of Personnel Management, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L.: 1993, Strategic Management: Awareness and Change (Chapman & Hall, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstyl, S. and R. Corzine: 1997, ‘Rights and Wrongs’, Financial Times, March 18, p. 24.

  • Willetts, P.: 1998, ‘Political Globalization and the Impact of NGOs Upon Transnational Companies’, in J. V. Mitchell (ed.), Companies in a World of Conflict: NGOs, Sanctions and Corporate Responsibility (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. et al.: 1997, Building Corporate Accountability (Earthscan, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaler, J. Reasons To Be Ethical: Self-Interest and Ethical Business. Journal of Business Ethics 27, 161–173 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006450018660

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006450018660

Navigation