Skip to main content
Log in

Embedding Friendly First-Order Paradefinite and Connexive Logics

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

First-order intuitionistic and classical Nelson–Wansing and Arieli–Avron–Zamansky logics, which are regarded as paradefinite and connexive logics, are investigated based on Gentzen-style sequent calculi. The cut-elimination and completeness theorems for these logics are proved uniformly via theorems for embedding these logics into first-order intuitionistic and classical logics. The modified Craig interpolation theorems for these logics are also proved via the same embedding theorems. Furthermore, a theorem for embedding first-order classical Arieli–Avron–Zamansky logic into first-order intuitionistic Arieli–Avron–Zamansky logic is proved using a modified Gödel–Gentzen negative translation. The failure of a theorem for embedding first-order classical Nelson–Wansing logic into first-order intuitionistic Nelson–Wansing logic is also shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almukdad, A., & Nelson, D. (1984). Constructible falsity and inexact predicates. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 49(1), 231–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angell, R. (1962). A propositional logics with subjunctive conditionals. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 27, 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (1996). Reasoning with logical bilattices. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 5, 25–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (1998). The value of the four values. Artificial Intelligence, 102(1), 97–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (2016). Minimal paradefinite logics for reasoning with incompleteness and inconsistency. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD), (Vol. 52 pp. 7:1–7:15). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs).

  6. Arieli, O., & Avron, A. (2017). Four-valued paradefinite logics. Studia Logica, 105(6), 1087–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arieli, O., Avron, A., & Zamansky, A. (2011). Ideal paraconsistent logics. Studia Logica, 99(1-3), 31–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belnap, N. D. (1977). A useful four-valued logic. In G. Epstein J. M. Dunn (Eds.) Modern uses of multiple-valued logic (pp. 5–37). Reidel: Dordrecht.

  9. Belnap, N. D. (1977). How a computer should think. In G. Ryle (Ed.) Contemporary aspects of philosophy (pp. 30–56). Stocksfield: Oriel Press.

  10. Béziau, J.-Y. (2009). Bivalent semantics for De Morgan logic (The uselessness of four-valuedness). In W.A. Carnieli, M.E. Coniglio, & I.M. D’Ottaviano (Eds.) The many sides of logic (pp. 391–402). College Publications.

  11. Craig, W. (1957). Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 22(3), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn, J. M. (1976). Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailment and ‘coupled trees’. Philosophical Studies, 29(3), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentzen, G. (1969). In Szabo, M.E. (Ed.), Collected papers of Gerhard Gentzen. North-Holland: Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics.

  14. Gurevich, Y. (1977). Intuitionistic logic with strong negation. Studia Logica, 36, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Omori, & H. Wansing (Eds.) (2019). New essays on Belnap-Dunn logic, Synthese Library. Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, (Vol. 418 p. 324). Springer.

  16. H. Wansing, H. Omori, & T. M. Ferguson (Eds.) (2016). Special issue: Connexive logics. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 3(3).

  17. Kamide, N. (2011). Notes on Craig interpolation for LJ with strong negation. Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 57(4), 395–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamide, N. (2017). Extending ideal paraconsistent four-valued logic. Proceedings of the 47th IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL), 2017, 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamide, N. (2019). An extended paradefinte Belnap-Dunn logic that is embeddable into classical logic and vice versa. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2019), 2, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kamide, N. (2020). Kripke-completeness and cut-elimination theorems for intuitionistic paradefinite logics with and without quasi-explosion. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 49 (6), 1185–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamide, N., & Shramko, Y. (2017). Embedding from multilattice logic into classical logic and vice versa. Journal of Logic and Computation, 27(5), 1549–1575.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kamide, N., & Wansing, H. (2012). Proof theory of Nelson’s paraconsistent logic: a uniform perspective. Theoretical Computer Science, 415, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kamide, N., & Wansing, H. (2015). Proof theory of N4-related paraconsistent logics, Studies in Logic. College Publications, 54, 1–401.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kamide, N., & Zohar, Y. (2019). Yet another paradefinite logic: The role of conflation. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 27(1), 93–117.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kamide, N., & Zohar, Y. (2020). Completeness and cut-elimination for first-order ideal paraconsistent four-valued logic. Studia Logica, 108(3), 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamide, N., & Zohar, Y. (2020). Modal extensions of ideal paraconsistent four-valued logic and its subsystem. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 171(10):102830.

  27. Kripke, S. A. (1965). Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic I. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 40, 92–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McCall, S. (1966). Connexive implication. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 31, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson, D. (1949). Constructible falsity. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 14, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Omori, H., & Wansing, H. (2017). 40 years of FDE: an introductory overview. Studia Logica, 105(6), 1021–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Omori, H., & Wansing, H. (2015). A web site on connexive logic, https://sites.google.com/site/connexivelogic/home.

  32. Priest, G. (2002). Paraconsistent logic, Handbook of Philosophical Logic. In D. Gabbay F. Guenthner (Eds.). 2nd edn., (Vol. 6 pp. 287–393). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  33. Rautenberg, W. (1979). Klassische und nicht-klassische Aussagenlogik. Braunschweig: Vieweg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Takeuti, G. (2013). Proof theory, 2nd edn. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. Mineola.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vorob’ev, N. N. (1952). A constructive propositional calculus with strong negation (in Russian). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 85, 465–468.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wansing, H. (1993). The logic of information structures, (p. 681 163). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence.

  37. Wansing, H. (2005). Connexive modal logic. Advances in Modal Logic, 5, 367–385.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wansing, H. (2020). Connexive logic, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-connexive/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18K11171 and JP16KK0007 and Grant-in-Aid for Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norihiro Kamide.

Additional information

Ethical Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamide, N. Embedding Friendly First-Order Paradefinite and Connexive Logics. J Philos Logic 51, 1055–1102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09659-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09659-3

Keywords

Navigation