Abstract
Pork producers in Western Europe moreand more encounter a variety of societalconcerns about pork and pork production. Sofar, however, producers predominantly focusedon low consumer prices, therewith addressingjust one concern. This resulted in an intensiveand large-scale production system, decreasinglyrelated to the area of farm land, andaccompanied with increasing concerns aboutsafety and healthiness of pork, animal welfare,environmental pollution, and others.An overview was given of possible concernsabout West-European pork production with theconsumers, citizens, and producers, and thoseconcerns are traced back to the pork productionsystem. The various kinds and qualities ofinformation about the pork production system onwhich possible concerns are based have beenworked out extensively in this paper. Knowledgeabout the aspects of pork production that cangive rise to concerns can be used in two ways.First, the communication about those aspectstowards consumers and citizens can be adjustedor extended to give them better possibilitiesto make food choices or to develop their ownopinions about pork production. Second,producers could change the pork productionsystem such that it better satisfies consumersand citizens. Such adaptations are wellpossible, as three pork quality schemes, whichhave been evaluated, illustrate. However, mostof these adaptations can only be carried out atthe cost of the present low consumer prices andwill not occur spontaneously on a large scale.Therefore, accounting for the type andrelevance of the concerns, legislation isnecessary to address societal concerns in abalanced way such that pork production systemsbecome acceptable for the majority of oursociety.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Blandford, D. and L. Fulponi, “Emerging Public Concerns in Agriculture: Domestic Policies and International Trade Commitments,” European Review of Agricultural Economics 26(3) (1999), 409–424.
Brom, F. W. A., “Food, Consumer Concerns, and Trust: Food Ethics for a Globalizing Market,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2000), 127–139.
Burrell, A. and G. Vrieze, “Dutch Consumers' Concern for theWelfare of Laying Hens: Is Purchasing Behaviour Ethically Motivated?” in P. Robinson (ed.), Pre-Prints of Eursafe 2000, 2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, 24- 26 August, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000, pp. 95–99.
Dagevos, J. C., “Consumentenzorgen als onderwerp van discussie: een inleiding,” TSL Tijdschrift voor Sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de Landbouw 15(2/3) (2000), 52–59.
Denktank Varkenshouderij, Mythen en Sagen rond de Varkenshouderij. Report Wageningen University and Research Centre (Wageningen, 1999), 46 pp.
De Greef, K. H., M. Bonneau, E. Dransfield, H. S. Horst, R. E. Klont, A. G. J. M. Oude Lansink, P. Rainelli, Y. Surry, and P. J. J. Veenendaal, “The Green Piggery Initiative: Market and Society Driven Changes in Pork Production,” Abstract P2.20 in Book of Abstracts of the 51st Annual Meeting of the EAAP (The Hague, The Netherlands, 2000).
Harper, G. C. and S. J. Henson, “Consumer Concerns about AnimalWelfare and the Impact on Food Choice,” EU FAIR CT98-3678 (Centre for Food Economics Research, The University of Reading, 2001).
Hoste, R., J. Kampshof, C. Bosch, T. De Juncker, and M. Steverink, Kostprijsberekening biologische vleesvarkens en biggen (Platform Biologica, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2000).
Issanchou, S., “Consumer Expectations and Perceptions of Meat and Meat Product Quality,” Meat Science 43(S) (1996), S5–S19.
Korthals, M., “Taking Consumers Seriously: Two Concepts of Consumer Sovereignity,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2001), 201–215.
Latouche, K., “Farm Animal Welfare: French Perception Through Contingent Valuation Method,” Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Zurich, 22- 26 August 1999.
Niggli, U., “Ethical Values and Historical Dogmas of Organic Farming: Promise or Peril for Its Future Development?” In P. Robinson (ed.), Preprints of Eursafe 2000, 2nd Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics, 24- 26 August, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000, pp. 23–29.
PVE, Algemene voorwaarden overeenkomsten PVV/IKB-Varkens 1991 en aanvulling 1995. Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Rijswijk (1994).
PVE, Vlees: cijfers en trends 1995. Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Rijswijk (1996).
PVE, Vlees: cijfers en trends 1998. Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Rijswijk (1999).
PVE, Integrale Keten Beheersing. IKB: driedubbel gecontroleerde kwaliteit. Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Rijswijk (2000).
PVE, Varkensafzetrapport. Unpublished Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs, Rijswijk (2001).
PVE, Positieve lijst diergeneesmiddelen voor PVV/IKB-Varkensbedrijven, Report Product Boards for Livestock, Meat and Eggs and http://www.pve.nl/indexpve.htm, Zoetermeer (2002).
RSPCA, “RSPCA Welfare Standards for Pigs,” RSPCA (Horsham, UK, 2000), 44 p.
Schifferstein, H. N. J., M. J. J. M. Candel, and H. C. M. Van Trijp, TSL Tijdschrift voor Sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de Landbouw 13(3) (1998), 163–175.
Skal, Rules for Organic Production in the Netherlands (Skal, Zwolle, The Netherlands, 2001) and http://www.skal.com/english/_skal/index.htm.
Steenkamp, J-B. E. M., “Conceptual Model of the Quality Perception Process,” Journal of Business Research 21 (1990), 309–333.
Steenkamp, J-B. E. M., “Dynamics in Consumer Behavior with Respect to Agricultural and Food Products,” in B. Wierenga, A. van Tilburg, K. Grunert, J-B. E. M. Steenkamp, and M. Wedel (eds.), Agricultural Marketing and Consumer Behavior in a Changing World (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1997), pp. 143–188.
Sundrum, A., “Organic Livestock Farming. A Critical Review,” Livestock Production Science 67 (2001), 207–215.
Te Velde, H. and N. Aarts, “Eten, maar niet willen weten. Percepties van dierenwelzijn in de veehouderij,” Spil 169- 170 (2000), 31–36.
Verbeke, W., “Consumentenzorgen en methoden om deze te meten,” TSL Tijdschrift voor Sociaal wetenschappelijk onderzoek van de Landbouw 15(2/3) (2000), 73–79.
Verbeke, W., M. J. Van Oeckel, N. Warnants, J. Viaene, and Ch. V. Boucqué, “Consumer Perception, Facts and Possibilities to Improve Acceptability of Health and Sensory Characteristics of Pork,” Meat Science 53 (1999), 77–99.
Verbeke, W. A. J. and J. Viaene, “Ethical Challenges for Livestock Production: Meeting Consumer Concerns about Meat Safety and Animal Welfare,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2000), 141–151.
Visscher, P. M., R. Pong-Wong, C. Whittemore, and C. Haley, “Impact of Biotechnology on (Cross)breeding Programmes in Pigs,” Livestock Production Science 65(1- 2) (2000), 57–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kanis, E., Groen, A.F. & De Greef, K.H. Societal Concerns about Pork and Pork Production and Their Relationships to the Production System. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 137–162 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022985913847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022985913847