Skip to main content
Log in

Practical and scientific rationality: A Bayesian perspective on Levi's difficulty

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In ‘Practical and Scientific Rationality: A Difficulty for Levi's Epistemology,’ Wayne Backman points to genuine difficulties in Isaac Levi's epistemology, difficulties that Backman attributes to Levi's having required, and for no good reason, that a rational person adopt but one standard of possibility for all her endeavors practical and scientific. I argue that Levi's requirement has, in fact, a deep and compelling motivation that tips the scales in favor of a different diagnosis of Levi's ills — i.e., that Levi's error lies simply in his having set insufficiently high qualifications for admission into the corpus that determines a person's standard of possibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was read as a comment on Wayne Backman's “Practical and Scientific Rationality: A Difficulty for Levi's Epistemology” at the American Philosophical Association Western Division meetings held in April 1983.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaplan, M. Practical and scientific rationality: A Bayesian perspective on Levi's difficulty. Synthese 57, 277–282 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064699

Keywords

Navigation