Cripping the Story of Overcoming: An Analysis of the Discourses and Practices of Self-Regulation in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v18i1.3921Keywords:
disabled childhoods, normalcy, self-regulation, crip theoryAbstract
This paper applies crip theory (McRuer, 2006, 2018) as well as other key conceptual tools from disabled childhood studies (Runswick-Cole et al., 2018) and disability studies in education (Cousik & Maconochie, 2017) as a tactic intended to question and resist the story of overcoming as it manifests itself within the discourses and practices of self-regulation in early learning classrooms. This paper offers a brief overview of the range of self-regulation strategies enacted within educational settings in Ontario, Canada, that purport to support young children in overcoming themselves on their way to normalcy. This paper also engages in crip theory as a strategy to both question and disrupt the taken for granted assumption that self-regulation entails a return towards or a sustaining of the efficient and productive neoliberal individual in school systems. Finally, this paper considers how we might not only invite but embrace the disruptions that occur when embodied differences refuse to be overcome by demands to self-regulate. Ultimately, a key aim of this paper is to resist how discourses and practices of self-regulation in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) establish the overcoming narrative as a means to cure, fix or exclude embodied differences while contemplating the vibrant possibilities embedded within learning with and from disabled childhoods.
References
Adichie, C. (2009). The danger of a single story. TED Ideas worth spreading. http://b.3cdn.net/ascend/2029fab7aa68da3f31_jqm6bn6lz.pdf
Cousik, R., & Maconochie, H. (2017). “Hey the tomatoes didn’t grow, but something else did!”: Contesting containment, cultivating competence in children labeled with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5490
Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled children’s childhood studies: A distinct approach? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617-1630.
Davies, A. W., & Kenneally, N. (2020). Cripping the controversies: Ontario rights-based debates in sexuality education. Sex Education, 20(4), 366-382.
DeVolder, B. (2013). Overcoming the overcoming story: A case of “compulsory heroism”. Feminist Media Studies, 13(4), 746-754.
Dyer, H. (2019). The queer aesthetics of childhood: Asymmetries of innocence and the cultural politics of child development. Rutgers University Press.
Fritsch, K. (2016). Cripping neoliberal futurity: Marking the elsewhere and elsewhen of desiring otherwise. Feral Feminisms, 5, 11-26.
Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2019). Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: A time of neoliberal-ableism. Rethinking History, 23(2), 233-251.
Hernández-Saca, D. I., & Kahn, L. G. (2019). “The problem isn’t yourself overcoming, it’s other people overcoming you:” A decolonizing mental health DSE curricular cripstemology reading of Daniel and Luna’s intersectional dis/ability experiences. Educational Studies, 55(4), 436-452.
Karmiris, M. (2020). The myth of independence as better: Transforming curriculum through disability studies and decoloniality. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 9(5), 96-121.
Johnson, M. L., & McRuer, R. (2014). Cripistemologies: Introduction. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(2), 127-147.
Maich, K., Davies, A. W. J., & van Rhijn, T. (2019). A relaxation station in every location. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(3), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218767916
McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
McRuer, R. (2018). Crip times: Disability, globalization, and resistance. New York University Press.
Mills, C., & LeFrançois, B. A. (2018). Child as metaphor: Colonialism, psy-governance, and epistemicide. World Futures, 74(7-8), 503-524.
Montroy, J. J., Bowles, R. P., Skibbe, L. E., McClelland, M. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2016). The development of self-regulation across early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1744-1762.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). The kindergarten program. https://files.ontario.ca/books/edu_the_kindergarten_program_english_aoda_web_oct7.pdf
Pyne, J. (2021). Autistic disruptions, trans temporalities: A narrative “trap door” in time. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(2), 343-361.
Runswick-Cole, K., Curran, T., & Liddiard, K. (Eds.). (2018). The Palgrave handbook of disabled children’s childhood studies. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shanker, S. (2010). Self-regulation: Calm, alert, and learning. Education Canada, 50(3), 4-7.
Shanker, S. (2013). Calm, alert, and learning: Classroom strategies for self-regulation. Pearson.
Titchkosky, T. (2019). The educated sensorium and the inclusion of disabled people as excludable. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 21(1), 282-290.
Titchkosky, T., & De Welles, M. (2020). University managed minds: The colonial reproduction of students as mental health problems. Journal of Disability Studies in Education, 1, 1-29.
Vassallo, S. (2013). Critical pedagogy and neoliberalism: Concerns with teaching self-regulated learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(6), 563-580.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Karmiris, Adam Davies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
