Abstract
In spite of stricter provisions inthe new EU directive on deliberate release ofgenetically modified organisms (GMOs), criticsstill advocate a moratorium on permits forcultivation of GMOs. However, in an attempt tomeet concerns raised by the public, thedirective explicitly gives Member States thepossibility to take into consideration ethicalaspects of GMOs in the decision-making. Thisarticle investigates the potential effects ofsuch formulation by means of an empiricalanalysis of experiences gained the last yearsfrom similar Swedish regulations for GMOs,aiming at promoting sustainable development.The faulty implementation shown in the Swedishcase indicates that legal stipulations forethics as such have limited importance. It issuggested that public participation is animportant factor for successful implementationof the ethics of sustainable development.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Carpenter, J., “GM Crops and Patterns of Pesticide Use,” Science 292 (2001), 208.
de Visser, A. J. C., E. H. Nijhuis, J. D. van Elas, and T. A. Dueck, Crops of Uncertain Nature? Controversies and Knowledge Gaps Concerning Genetically Modified Crops - An Inventory (Plant Research International B. V., Wageningen, 2000).
EC, “Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC,” Official Journal L 106(17.4) (2001), 1–38.
Eduljee, G. H., “Trends in Risk Assessment and Risk Management,” The Science of the Total Environment 249 (2000), 13–23.
EEA, Environment in the European Union at the Turn of the Century (European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen, 1999), p. 246.
EEB, Press Release on 14.2 on the Revision of Directive 90/220 on Release of GMOs: Compromise Text Not Good Enough for Public Health and the Environment. The EEB Demands: Keep Up the Moratorium (European Environmental Bureau, Brussels, 2001).
EEC, “Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms,” Official Journal L 117(8.5) (1990a), 15–27.
EEC, “Council Directive 90/219/EEC of 23 April 1990 on the Contained Use of Genetically Modified Micro-Organisms,” Official Journal L 117(8.5) (1990b), 1–14.
FOE, Press Release 14.2: Should Have Been Better. Europe Adopts New GMO Directive (Friends of the Earth Europe, Brussels, 2001).
Gaskell, G., N. Allum, M. Bauer, J. Durant, A. Allansdottir, H. Bonfadelli, D. Boy, S. de Chevigné, B. Fjaestad, J. M. Gutteling, J. Hampel, E. Jelsøe, J. C. Jesuino, M. Kohring, N. Kronberger, C. Midden, T. H. Nielsen, A. Przestalski, T. Rusanen, G. Sakellaris, H. Torgersen, T. Twardowski, and W. Wagner, “Biotechnology and the European Public,” Nature Biotechnology 18 (2000), 935–938.
GTAB, Summary of Decisions 1998 (Gene Technology Advisory Board, Stockholm, 1998).
Hilder, V. A. and D. Boulter, “Genetic Engineering of Crop Plants for Insect Resistance - a Critical Review,” Crop Protection 18 (1999), 177–191.
Hodgson. J., “National Politicians Block GM progress,” Nature Biotechnology 18 (2000), 704–706.
James, C., “Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2000,” ISAAA Briefs No. 21: Preview (ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, 2000).
Kaiser, J., “Words (and Axes) Fly over Transgenic Trees,” Science 292 (2001), 34–36.
Karlsson, M. and M. Ljung, “Understanding Sustainable Development: A Systemic View for Successful Realisation,” in Proceedings from the 2001 International Sustainable Development Research Conference, 5- 6th April 2001 at University of Manchester, UK (ERP Environment, Shipley, 2001), pp. 126–133.
Krattiger, A. F, “The Importance of Ag-Biotech to Global Prosperity,” ISAAA Briefs No. 6 (ISAAA, Ithaca, NY, 1998).
Krimsky, S. and R. Wrubel, Agricultural Biotechnology and the Environment: Science, Policy and Social Issues (University of Illinois Press, Chicago, 1996).
Lehman, V., “Patents on Seed Sterility Threatens Seed Saving,” Biotechnology and Development Monitor 35 (1998), 6–8.
Losey, J. E., L. S. Rayor, and M. E. Carter, “Transgenic Pollen Harms Monarch Larvae,” Nature 399 (1999), 214.
Mellon, M., “Genetically Engineered Organisms, Sustainable Development, and Community Benefits,” in P. Sandberg (ed.), Release and Use of Genetically Modified Organisms: Sustainable Development and Legal Control (Norwegian Biotechnology Board, Oslo, 1995), pp. 9–19.
Mepham, B., “A Framework for the Ethical Analysis of Novel Foods: The Ethical Matrix,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12 (2000), 165–176.
Millstone, E., E. Brunner, and S. Mayer, “Beyond 'substantial Equivalence',” Nature 401 (1999), 525–526.
MOE, Governmental Bill 97/98:45 The Environmental Code, Part II (Ministry of Environment, Stockholm, 1998).
Moffatt, I., “A Critique of Ethical and Social Issues of Genetically Modified Crops,” The International Journal of Sustainable Development 7 (2000), 251–261.
Moses, V., “Biotechnology Products and European Consumers,” Biotechnology Advances 17 (1999), 647–678.
Nordlee, J. A., S. I. Taylor, J. A. Townsend, and R. K. Bush, “Identification of a Brazil Nut Allergen in Transgenic Soya-Beans,” The New England Journal of Medicine 334 (1996), 688–692.
Peerenboom, E., “German Health Minister Calls Time Out for Bt Maize,” Nature Biotechnology 18 (2000), 374.
Persley, G. J., “Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor: Promethian Science,” in G. J. Persley and M. M. Lantin (eds.), Agricultural Biotechnology and the Poor (US National Academy of Sciences, CGIAR and the World Bank, Washington, 2000), pp. 3–21.
Saxena, D. and G. Stotzky, “Insecticidal Toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is Released from Roots of Transgenic BT Corn in itro and in situ,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology 33 (2000), 33–39.
SBA, Cases 22-1019/00, 22-1020/00, 22-1021/00, 22-2834/00, 22-1911/99, 22-2769/99, 22-469/99, 22-6885/98, 22-6230/99, 22-6369/99, 22-312/00, 22-6899/98, and 22-6924/99 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 2000a).
SBA, Case 22-312/00 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 2000b).
SBA, Cases: 22 469/99, 22 755/99, 22 1087/99, 22 1088/99, 22 1089/99, 22 1387/99, 22 1911/99, 22 2769/99 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 1999a).
SBA, Case 22 469/99, Vol. 9, No. 4 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 1999b).
SBA, Cases: 22 637/98, 22 1070/98, 22 1073/98, 22 1105/98, 22 1106/98, 22 1107/98, 22 1615/98, 22 1825/98, 22 2519/98, 22 6885/98, 22 6899/98, 22 6907/98, 22 6908/98, 22 6925/98 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 1998a).
SBA, Case: 22 6899/98 (The Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping, 1998b).
SFS (1998: 808), The Environmental Code.
SFS (1994: 900), Act Concerning Genetically Modified Organisms.
SFS (1994: 901), Ordinance on Genetically Modified Organisms.
SFS (1994: 902), Ordinance on the Gene Technology Advisory Board.
SJVFS (1999: 124), Regulations from the Swedish Board of Agriculture on Deliberate Release of Genetically Modified Organisms.
SOU (1992: 82), Genteknik - en utmaning [Gene Technology - a Challenge] (Allmänna förlaget, Stockholm, 1992) (in Swedish).
THC, “Memorandum Submitted by Advanta Seeds UK Ltd (G1),” in Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Agriculture Committee 18.6 (The House of Commons, London, UK, 2000).
Uzogara, S. G., “The Impact of Genetic Modification of Human Foods in the 21st Century: A Review,” Biotechnology Advances 18 (2000), 179–206.
UNCED, “Agenda 21, Part III, Chapter 16,” in Report of the Conference of the United Nations on Environment and Development (United Nations, New York, 1993).
Vamling, K., “A Natural Step? Genetic Modification for the Improvement of Plant Cultivars,” in Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, Aspects of Gene Technology (KVA, Stockholm, 1998), pp. 13–20.
Watkinson, A. R., R. P. Freckelton, R. A. Robinson, and W. J. Sutherland, “Predictions of Biodiversity Response to Genetically Herbicide-Tolerant Crops,” Science 289 (2000), 1554–1557.
WCED, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).
Westerlund, S., “Spaltkommentarer. Miljöbalken 1-17 samt 24 kapitel [Comments to the Environmental Code, Chapters 1- 17 and 24],” Miljörättslig tidskrift 1 (1999) (in Swedish).
Wolfenbarger, L. L. and P. R. Phifer, “The Ecological Risks and Benefits of Genetically Engineered Plants,” Science 290 (2001), 2088–2093.
Ye, X., S. Al-Babili, A. Klöti, J. Zhang, P. Lucca, P. Beyer, and I. Potrykus, “Engineering the Provitamin A (B-Carotene) Biosynthetic Pathway in (Carotenoid-Free) Rice Endosperm,” Science 287 (2000), 303–305.
Zetterberg, Z., Miljörättslig kontroll av genteknik [Control of genetic engineering in Environmental Law]. PhD dissertation, IUSTUS, Uppsala, 1998 (in Swedish).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karlsson, M. Ethics of Sustainable Development – a Study of Swedish Regulations for Genetically Modified Organisms. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16, 51–62 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021735201970
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021735201970