Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-29T17:46:04.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Challenges to the New Familialism: Lifestyle Experimentation and the Freedom of Intimate Association

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Karen Struening
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The new familialists argue that the decline of the intact two-parent family is responsible for our most pressing social problems and advocate public policies designed to promote family stability and discourage divorce and nonmarital births. This essay defends the freedom of intimate association and argue that family stability, while an important good, must be balanced with other goods such as equality and justice within the family, happiness, and individual self-development.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 1: Special Issue: The Family and Feminist Theory , Winter 1996 , pp. 135 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackmun, Harry. 1986. Dissenting opinion. Bowers v. Hardwick. 478 U.S. 186.Google Scholar
Chira, Susan. 1994. War over role of American fathers. New York Times, 19 June, National section, 22.Google Scholar
Cohen, Susan, and Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1988. The war over the family is not over the family. In Feminism, children, and the new families, ed. Dornbusch, Sanford M. and Strober, Myra H.New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dill, Bonnie Thornton, Baca Zinn, Maxine, and Patton, Sandra. 1993. Feminism, race, and the politics of family values. Philosophy and Public Policy 13(3): 13–18.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Feminist discourse and its discontents: Language, power and meaning. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, ed. Keohane, Nannerl O.Rosaldo, Michelle Z. and Gelpi, Barbara C.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982a. Feminism, family, and community. Dissent 29(4): 442–49.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982b. Antigone's daughters. Democracy 2(2): 46–59.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1990. The family and the civic order. In Power trips and other journeys: Essays in feminism as civic discourse. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Democracy on trial. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke and Buell, John. 1991. Families in trouble. Dissent 38(2): 262–66.Google Scholar
Frazer, Nancy. 1987. What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. In Feminism as critique, ed. Benhabib, Seyla and Cornell, Drucilla. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Marilyn. 1990. Feminism and modern friendship: Dislocating the community. In Feminism and political theory, ed. Sunstein, Cass R.Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1991. Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galston, William A. 1992a. New familism, new politics. Family Affairs 5(1–2): 7–9.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1992b. The reinstituaonalization of marriage: Political theory and public policy. New York: Institute for American Values Working Paper 15.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. 1995. A liberal‐democratic case for the two‐parent family. In Rights and the common good: The communitarian perspective, ed. Etzioni, Amitai. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Richard T. and Grandon Gill, T. 1994. A new plan for the family. Family Affairs 6(1–2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1994. Welfare reform: A history lesson. Dissent 41(3): 323–28.Google Scholar
Hewlett, Sylvia Ann. 1991. When the bough breaks: The cost of neglecting our children. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hochman, Anndee. 1994. Everyday acts and small subversions: Woman reinventing family, community, and home. Portland: The Eighth Mountain Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie, with Machung, Anne. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher, and Edin, Kathryn. 1995. Do poor women have the right to bear children? The American Prospect 20: 43–52.Google Scholar
Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla, and Galston, William. 1990. Putting children first: A progressive family policy for the 1990s. Washington D.C.: Progressive Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morris B. 1994. Intimacy and equality: The question of lesbian and gay marriage. The Philosophical Forum 25:333–66.Google Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L 1980. The freedom of intimate association. Yale Law Journal 4(89): 624–92.Google Scholar
Kateb, George. 1992. The inner ocean: Individualism and democratic culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. [1859] 1975. On liberty. ed. Spitz, David. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Popenoe, David. 1991. Family decline in the Swedish welfare state. The Public Interest 102: 65–77.Google Scholar
Popenoe, David. 1992. American family decline: 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. New York: Institute for American Values Working Paper 19.Google Scholar
Rossi, Alice. 1977. A biosocial perspective on parenting. Daedalus 106(2): 1–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Skolnick, Arlene, and Rosencrantz, Stacey. 1994. The new crusade for the old family. The American Prospect 18: 59–65.Google Scholar
Sommers, Christina Hoff. 1994. Philosophers against the family. In Communitarianism: A new public ethics, ed. Daly, Markate. Belmont CA: Wadsworth. Originally published In Person to Person, ed. George Graham and Hugh Lafollette. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1983. The new conservative feminism. Feminist Studies 9(3): 559–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1990. Brave new families: Stories of domestic upheaval in late twentieth century America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Stacey, Judith. 1994. The new family values crusaders. Nation 259(4): 119–22.Google Scholar
State of the union. 1995. The Washington Post, 25 January, A31.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. 1979. The family, sex, and marriage in England 1500‐1800. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of modem identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, Kath. 1992. The politics of gay families. In Rethinking the family: Some feminists questions, ed. Thome, Barrie with Yalom, Marilyn. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Barbara Dafoe. 1992. A new familism? Family Affairs 5(1–2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Barbara Dafoe, and Blankenhorn, David. 1991. Man, women, and public policy: Difference and dependency in the American conversation. New York: American Institute for Values Working Paper 3.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Barbara Dafoe, and Blankenhorn, David. 1993. Dan Quayle was right. The Atlantic 271(4): 46–84.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1994. Making single motherhood normal. Dissent 41(1): 88–93.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1995. Mothers, citizenship, and independence: A critique of pure family values. Ethics 105(3): 535–56.10.1086/293726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, Baca Maxine. 1989. Family, race and poverty in the eighties. Signs 14(4): 856–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar