Gezi Assemblages: Embodied Encounters in the Making of an Alternative Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v12i1.1594Keywords:
Occupy Movements, Gezi Movement, assemblage, network, body, embodimentAbstract
The article aspires to make a claim for the potential of the Deleuze-Guattarian concept of assemblage (agencement) to account for the Occupy Movements in general and 2013 Turkey Gezi Movement in particular. Throughout the article, it is claimed that the concept of agencement provides us with useful tools to elucidate the constitution of a new dissident community in Gezi Park and the subsequent park assemblies. Special emphasis will be put on the capacity of the concept to account for the embodied and embedded nature of the Gezi Movement, an argument further supported by data coming from participatory observations throughout different phases of the mobilization, 23 in depth interviews with activists from different political backgrounds and minutes of the park assemblies. Although the concept of assemblage has started to be used in the analysis of social movements (Bennett, 2005; Chesters & Welsh, 2006; Lockie 2004; McFarlane, 2009; Rodriguez-Giralt, 2011, 2015; Rodriguez-Giralt & Marrero-Guillamón,2018), not much emphasis is given to the concepts of embodiment and body in assemblages. This article aspires to contribute to the literature by first underlining the importance of embodiment in the Gezi movement and second elucidating it with respect to the concept of body in the original use of the term of assemblage by Deleuze and Guattari (1980).
References
Bakıner, O. (2014). Can “the spirit of gezi” transform progressive politics in Turkey. In Ü. Özkırımlı (Ed.), The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi (pp. 65-76). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bassett, K. (2014). Ranciere, politics and the Occupy Movement. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(5), 886-901.
Berktay, F. (2014). Opening remarks. In Z. E. Güler (Ed.), New opportunities and impasses: Theorizing and experiencing politics (pp. 8-10). Istanbul, TR: Dakam Publishing.
Bennett, J. (2005). The agency of assemblages and the North American blackout. Public Culture, 17(3), 445-465.
Butler, J. (2014a). Bodily vulnerability, coalitions and street politics. Critical Studies, 37(1), 99-119.
Butler, J. (2014b). Foreword. In Ü. Özkırımlı (Eds.), The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi. (pp. vii- xvii). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Butler, J. (2013). Exercising freedom (Interview with Judith Butler). Revolutions: Global trends & Regional Issues, 1(1), 32-41.
Butler, J. (2011). Bodies in alliance and the politics of the street. European Institute for Progressive Cultural Policies, 9. Retrieved from http://www.eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of rage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Original work published 2012)
Chesters, G., & Welsh, I. (2006). Complexity and social movements: Multiplicities at the edge of chaos. New York: Routledge.
Conio, A. (2015). Occupy: A people yet to come. London: Open Humanities Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.
Deleuze. G., & Guattari, F. (1980). Milles plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrenie 2. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. New York: Columbia University Press.
Della Porta, D., & Mattoni, A. (2014). Spreading protest: Social movements in times of crisis. UK: ECPR Press.
Dikeç, M. (2017). Urban rage: The revolt of the excluded. Leicester, UK: Yale University Press.
Doğan, M. (2014, June 6). Kırmızılı, siyahlı, başörtülü, sapanli kadinlar. geziYorum çekiYorum Retrieved from http://geziyorum-cekiyorum.blogspot.com.es/2014/06/kufurle-degil-inatla.html
D’Orsi, L. (2015). Crossing boundaries and reinventing futures: An ethnography of practices of dissent in Gezi Park. In G. Koç & H. Aksu (Eds.), Another brick in the barricade: The Gezi resistance and its aftermath (pp. 16-34). Bremen, DE: Erscheinungsjahr.
Estralella, A., & Jiménez, A. (2016). Matters of sense: Preoccupation in Madrid’s popular assemblies movement. In A. Block & I Farias (Eds.), Urban cosmopolitics: Agencements, assemblies, atmospheres (pp. 147-165). London: Routledge.
Farro, A., & Demirhisar, D. (2014). The Gezi Park movement: A Turkish experience of the twenty-first century collective movements. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 176-189.
Gambetti, Z. (2014). Occupy Gezi as politics of the body. In Ü. Özkırımlı (Ed.), The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi (pp. 89-102). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Books.
Gregory, D. (2013). Tahrir: Politics, publics and performances of space. Middle East Critique, 22(3), 235-246.
Happe, K. (2015). Parrhēsia, biopolitics and Occupy. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 48(2), 211-223.
hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: race, gender and cultural politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2007). Line: A brief history. London: Routledge.
Juris, J. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259-279.
Juris, J. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kaymak, Ö. (2014, May 31). Toplumsal hareketler ve gezi direnişi. Biamag Cumartesi. Retrieved from http://bianet.org/biamag/siyaset/156089-toplumsal-hareketler-ve-gezi-direnisi
Koç, G., & Aksu, H. (2015). The Gezi resistance and its aftermath. Bremen, DE: Erscheinungsort.
Kuyumlu, M. (2013). Reclaiming the right to the city: Reflections on the urban uprisings in Turkey, City, 17(3), 274-278.
Lockie, S. (2004). Collective agency, non-human causality and environmental social movements. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 41-58.
McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. GeoForum, 40, 561-567.
Müller, M. (2015). Assemblages and actor-networks: Rethinking socio-material power, politics and space. Geography Compass, 9(1), 27-41.
Nail, T. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(1), 21-37.
Özel, S. (2014). A moment of elation: The Gezi protests/resistance and the fading of the AKP project. In Ü.
Özkırımlı (Ed.), The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi (pp. 7-24). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Özkaynak, B., Aydιn, C. İ., Ertör-Akyazι, P., & Ertör, I. (2015). The Gezi Park resistance from an environmental justice and social metabolism perspective. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 26(1), 99-114.
Perrugorría, I., & Tejerina, B. (2013). Politics of the encounter: Cognition, emotions and networks in the Spanish 15M. Current Sociology 61(4), 424-442.
Protevi, J. (2015). Semantic, pragmatic and affective enactment in Occupy Wall Street. In A. Conio (Ed.), Occupy: A people yet to come (pp. 88-97). London: Open Humanities Press,
Protevi, J. (2009). Political affect: Connecting the social and the somatic. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Razsa, M., & Kurnik, A. (2012). The Occupy Movement in Zizek's hometown: Direct democracy and a politics of becoming. American Ethnologist. 89(2), 238-258.
Rodriguez-Giralt, I. (2015). Birds as lines: The production of alternative regimes of environmental management in the aftermath of a toxic disaster. Geoforum 66, 156-166.
Rodriguez-Giralt, I. (2011). Social movements as actor-networks: Prospects from a symmetrical approach to Donana’s environmentalist protests. Convergencia, 56, pp. 13-35.
Rodriguez-Giralt, I., & Marrero-Guillamón, I. (2018). Reassembling activism, activating assemblages: An introduction. Social Movement Studies Journal, 17(3), 1-24.
Sibertin-Blanc, G. (2013). Politique et etat chez Deleuze et Guattari: Essai sur le matérialisme historico-machinique. Paris: PUF.
Stengers, I., & Pignarre, P. (2005). La Sorcellerie Capitaliste. Paris: Editions Decouvert.
TODAP. (2013, September 22). Direnişten Önce ve Sonra Ruh Halleri - Atölye Raporu Sunumu. TODAP. Retrieved from http://todap.org/bolum_detay.aspx?yaziId=1370&bolumId=2
Tejerina, B., Perugorria, I., Benski, T., Langman, L. (2013). ‘From indignation to occupation: a new wave of global mobilization.’ Current Sociology, 61(4), 377-392.
Tuğal, C. (2013). “Resistance everywhere”: The Gezi revolt in global Perspective. New perspectives on Turkey, 49, 157-172.
Vatikiosis, A., & Yörük, M. (2016). Gezi movement and the networked public sphere: A comparative analysis in global contect. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 2056305116662184
Yörük, E., & Yüksel, M. (2014). Class and politics in Turkey’s Gezi protests. New Left Review, 89, 103-123.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
