We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2009
Morality requires us to act for the good of others. This is not the only moral requirement there is, and it is, of course, controversial where the good of others lies. But whatever their good is, there can be no serious doubt that acting so as to bring it about is one crucial obligation morality places on us. Yet the nature of this obligation is unclear, because there are difficult questions about its aim and about the motivational sources required for realizing it. Who are the others for whose good we are obligated to act? Are they only people in our immediate context, or members of our society, or all human beings? And, as a matter of moral psychology, what leads us to honor this obligation? Is it a sense of justice, decency, prudence, benevolence, or some combination of these and perhaps other virtues? The answers we give will shape our understanding of the nature of the obligation. For the character traits which we think should move us will influence the choice of people we aim to benefit and the inclusiveness we attribute to the obligation will affect the motives we wish to cultivate in ourselves and others.
I am indebted to Berel Lang, Bonnie Steinbock, and Eddy Zemach for help with this paper.
1 Brandt, R.B., “Traits of Character: A Conceptual Analysis,” American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 7 (1970), pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
2 On the last three, see Roberts, T.A., The Concept of Benevolence: Aspects of Eighteenth-Century Moral Philosophy (London: Macmillan, 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A., Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon, 1960), p. 487.Google Scholar
4 Hume, D., An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed. L.A., Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon, 1961), pp. 219–220.Google Scholar
5 Brandt, R.B., “The Psychology of Benevolence and Its Implications for Philosophy,” Journal of Philosophy, vol. 73 (1976), pp. 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Warnock, G.J., The Object of Morality (London: Methuen, 1971), p. 26.Google Scholar
7 Matthew, 22:37–40.
8 Kierkegaard, S., Works of Love, trans. H., Hong and E., Hong (New York: Harper, 1962), p. 2.Google Scholar
9 Sidgwick, H., The Methods of Ethics (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1981), p. 241.Google Scholar
10 Butler, J., Fifteen Sermons (London: 1953), pp. 185–187.Google Scholar
11 Stephen, J.F., Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (Cambridge: University Press, 1967), p. 240.Google Scholar
12 For a contemporary account of the Christian view, see Outka, G., Agape: An Ethical Analysis (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
13 Smart, J.J.C. and Williams, B., Utilitarianism: for and against (Cambridge: University Press, 1973), p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 I am indebted for my discussion to Miller, D.'s Philosophy and Ideology in Hume's Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon, 1981)Google Scholar; I also draw on my “Civility and Society,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, vol. 1 (1984), pp. 429–443.
15 Hume, Treatise, p. 481.
16 ibid., p. 602.
17 Mill, J.S., Utilitarianism (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979), p. 32.Google Scholar
18 Hume, Enquiry, p. 229.
19 Hume, D., Essays, Moral, Political and Literary, ed. T.H., Green and T.H., Gross (London: Longmans, 1898), vol. I, p. 292.Google Scholar
20 Mackie, J., Hume's Moral Theory (London: Routledge, 1980), p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Hume, Treatise, p. 493.
22 ibid., p. 413.
23 ibid., pp. 488–489.
24 ibid., p. 489.
25 Hume, Enquiry, pp. 44–45.
26 Hume, Treatise, p. 225.
27 See Rousseau, J-J, Emile, trans. B., Foxley (London: Dent, 1911).Google Scholar
28 See Schopenhauer, A., On the Basis of Morality, trans. E.J., Payne (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965).Google Scholar
29 See Taylor, R., Good and Evil (New York: Macmillan, 1970)Google Scholar, especially Part III.
30 See Beehler, R., The Moral Life (Oxford: Blackwell, 1978).Google Scholar
31 See Blum, L., Friendship, Altruism, and Morality (London: Routledge, 1980).Google Scholar
32 Smart and Williams, Utilitarianism, pp. 4–5.
