Abstract
In much of the discourse of evolutionary theory, reproduction is treated as an autonomous function of the individual organism — even in discussions of sexually reproducing organisms. In this paper, I examine some of the functions and consequences of such manifestly peculiar language. In particular, I suggest that it provides crucial support for the central project of evolutionary theory — namely that of locating causal efficacy in intrinsic properties of the individual organism. Furthermore, I argue that the language of individual reproduction is maintained by certain methodological conventions that both obscure many of the problems it generates and serve to actively impede attempts to redress those difficulties that can be identified. Finally, I suggest that inclusion of the complexities introduced by sexual reproduction — in both language and methodology — may radically undermine the individualist focus of evolutionary theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abugov, R.: 1983, ‘Genetics of Darwinian Fitness: 1. Fertility Selection’, The American Naturalist 121, No. 6, 880–886.
Bernstein, H., Byerly, H. C., Hopf, F. A., Michod, R. E., and Vemulapalli, G. K.: 1983, ‘The Darwinian Dynamic’, Quarterly Review of Biology 58, 185–207.
Bodmer, W. F.: 1965, ‘Differential Fertility in Population Genetics Models’, Genetics 51, 411–424.
Brandon, R.: 1982, ‘The Levels of Selection’, in P. Asquith and T. Nickles (eds.), PSA, 1982, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Mich.
Brandon, R. and Burian, R.: 1984, Genes, Organisms, and Populations, M.I.T. Press.
Byerly, H.: 1986, ‘Fitness as a Function’, Paper Presented at the P. S.A. Meetings, Pittsburgh, 1986.
Charlesworth, B.: 1970, ‘Selection in Populations with Overlapping Generations; 1. The Use of Malthusian Parameters in Population Genetics’, Theoretical Population Biology 1, No. 3. 352–370.
Charlesworth, B.: 1980, Selection in Age-Structured Populations, Cambridge Studies in Mathematical Biology, vol. 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Eng.
Christiansen, F. B.: 1983, ‘The Definition and Measurement of Fitness’,in B. Shorrocks (ed.), Evolutionary Ecology; B. E. S. Symposium 23, 65–79.
Christiansen, F. B. and Feldman, M.: 1986, Population Genetics, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Palo Alto, Ca.
Churchill, F. B.: 1979, ‘Sex and the Single Organism’, Studies in the History of Biology 3, 139–177.
Dawkins, R.: 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Eng.
Denniston, C.: 1978, ‘An Incorrect Definition of Fitness Revisited’, Annals of Human Genetics, Lond., 42, 77–85.
Emlen, J. M.: 1973, Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, Addison-Wesley, N. Y.
Farley, J.: 1982, Gametes and Spores: Ideas about Sexual Reproduction1750–1914, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.
Feldman, M., Christiansen, F. B., and Liberman, U.: 1983, ‘On Some Models of Fertility Selection’, Genetics 105, 1003–1010.
Fisher, R. A.: 1930, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Eng.; Dover, N.Y., 1958.
Hadeler, K. P. and Liberman, U.: 1975, ‘Selection Models with Fertility Differences’, Journal of Mathematical Biology 2, 19–32.
Hamilton, W. D.: 1975, ‘Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics’, in R. Fox (ed.), Biosocial Anthropology, Malaby Press, London (reprinted in R. Brandon and R. Burian, Genes, Organisms, and Populations, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Ma., 1984, pp. 193–202.
Hedrick, Philip W.: 1984, Genetics of Populations, Science Books, Int., Boston.
Lewontin, R. and Dunn, L. C.: 1960, ‘The Evolutionary Dynamics of a Polymorphism in the House Mouse’, Genetics 45, 705–722.
Michod, R. E.: 1985, ‘On Fitness and Adaptedness and their Role in Evolutionary Explanation’, J. Hist. Biol., in press.
Moran, P. A. P.: 1964, ‘On the Nonexistence of Adaptive Topographies’, Annals of Human Genetics, Lond., 27, 383–393.
Penrose, L. S.: 1949, ‘The Meaning of Fitness in Human Populations’, Annals of Eugenics 14, 301–304.
Pollak, E.: 1978, ‘With Selection for Fecundity the Mean Fitness Does Not Necessarily Increase’, Genetics 90, 383–389.
Pollak, E. and Kempthorne, O.: 1971, ‘Malthusian Parameters in Genetic Populations, II. Random Mating Populations in Infinite Habitats’, Theoretical Population Biology 2, 357–390.
Prout, T.: 1965, ‘The Estimation of Fitness from Genotypic Frequencies’, Evolution 19, 546–551.
Ricklefs, Robt. E.: 1973, Ecology. Chiron Press.
Roughgarden, J.: 1979, Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction, MacMillan, N. Y.
Sober, E. and Lewontin, R.: 1982, ‘Artifact, Cause, and Genic Selection’, Philosophy of Science, 47, 157–180.
Sober, E.: 1984, The Nature of Selection, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
Williams, G.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Wright, Sewall: 1980, ‘Genic and Organism Selection’, Evolution 34, 825–843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indepted to the Rockefeller Foundation for a Humanities Fellowship that supported this research during the spring of 1986. I am also grateful to Richard Lewontin, Diane Paul, and Lisa Lloyd for many extremely helpful conversations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, E.F. Reproduction and the central project of evolutionary theory. Biol Philos 2, 383–396 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127697
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127697