1975 Ng, Y. K., ‘Bentham or Bergson? Finite Sensibility, Utility Functions, and Social Welfare Functions’, Review of Economic Studies, xlii (1975), 545–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1979 Annette, J., ‘Bentham's Fear of Hobgoblins: Law, Political Economy and Social Discipline’, in Fine, Bob ed., Capitalism and the Rule of Law: From Deviancy Theory to Marxism, London: Hutchinson, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar

1981 Beynon, H., ‘Mighty Bentham’, Journal of Legal History, ii (1981), 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1981 Ng, Y. K., ‘Bentham or Nash: On the Acceptable Form of Social Welfare Functions’, Economic Record, lvii (1981), 238–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1985 Hoeflich, M. H., ‘John Austin and Joseph Story: Two Nineteenth-Century Perspectives on the Utility of the Civil Law for the Common Lawyer’, American Journal of Legal History, xxxix (1985), 36–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1986 Guruswamy, L. G., ‘English Law and Administration: Recalling a Jurisprudential Legacy’, Law Quarterly Review, cii (1986), 424.Google Scholar

1989 Craig, P. P., ‘Bentham, Public Law and Democracy’, Public Law, (Autumn 1989), 407–27.Google Scholar

1989 Twining, W., ‘Reading Bentham’, Proceedings of the British Academy, lxxv (1989), 97–141.Google Scholar

1990 Barry, N., Welfare, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

1990 Bentham, Jeremy, Securities Against Misrule and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece (The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham), ed. Schofield, P., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

1990 Guidi, M. E. L., ‘Economic Works of Bentham’, Economists Archives, i (1990), 39–49.Google Scholar

1990 ‘“Shall the blind lead those who can see?” Bentham's Theory of Political Economy’, in Moggridge, D. E. ed., Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought, vol. III, Classicals, Marxians and Neo Classicals, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar

1990 Hartz, L., The Necessity of Choice. Nineteenth-Century Political Thought, edited and compiled by Roazen, P., with a preface by B. Barber, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, chap. 16.Google Scholar

1990 Horne, T. A., Property Rights and Poverty. Political Argument in Britain, 1605–1834, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, chap. 5.Google Scholar

1990 Kelly, P. J., Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1990 Rosen, F., Thinking About Liberty, London: University College London.Google Scholar

1990 Sittala, R., ‘Punishment, Discipline and the Age of Reason. Enlightenment Philosophy on Punishment, especially in light of Jeremy Bentham's “Panopticon”’, in Campbell, T. D. ed., Law and Enlightenment in Britain, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, pp. 124–38.Google Scholar

Utilitas, ii (1990) Conway, S., ‘Bentham, the Benthamites, and the Nineteenth-Century British Peace Movement’, 221–44.Google Scholar

Utilitas, ii (1990) Kelly, P. J., ‘Utilitarian Strategies in Bentham and John Stuart Mill’, 245–66.Google Scholar

Utilitas, ii (1990) Lewis, A. D. E., ‘The Background to Bentham on Evidence’, 195–220.Google Scholar

Utilitas, ii (1990) West, R., ‘The Strangeways of Bentham’, The Spectator, no. 14, 7 04 1990, pp. 20–2.Google Scholar

1991 Conway, S., ‘John Bowring and the Nineteenth-Century Peace Movement’, Historical Research, lxiv (1991), 344–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1991 Dube, A., The Theme of Acquisitiveness in Bentham's Political Thought, New York: Garland.Google Scholar

1991 Freeden, M., Rights, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

1991 Lee, K., The Legal-Rational State: A Comparison of Hobbes, Bentham and Kelsen, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar

1991 Lobban, M., The Common Law and English Jurisprudence 1760–1850, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1991 Lyons, D., In the Interest of the Governed: A Study in Bentham's Philosophy of Utility and Law, Revised Edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1991 Plant, R., Modern Political Thought, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 138–47.Google Scholar

1991 Schofield, T. P., ‘Jeremy Bentham and Nineteenth-Century English Jurisprudence’, Journal of Legal History, xii (1991), 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar