This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aoun, J., Hornstein, N., Lightfoot, D., and Weinberg, A., 1987, “Two types of locality,” Linguistic Inquiry 18(4), 537–577.
Bard, E.G., Robertson, D., and Sorace, A., 1996, “Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability,” Language 72(1), 32–68.
Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L., 1988, “Psych-verbs and-theory,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(3), 291–352.
Birdsong, D., 1989, Metalinguistic Performance and Interlinguistic Competence, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Carroll, J.M., Bever, T.G., and Pollack, C.R., 1981, “The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions,” Language 57(2), 368–383.
Chaudron, C., 1983, “Research on metalinguistic judgments: A review of theory, methods, and results,” Language Learning 33(3), 343–377.
Chomsky, N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cowart, W., 1989a, “Illicit acceptability in picture NPs,” pp. 27–40 in Papers from the 25th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 1: The General Session, C. Wiltshire, R. Graczyk, and B. Music, eds., Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Cowart, W., 1989b, “Notes on the biology of syntactic processing,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(1), 89–103.
Cowart, W., 1994, “Anchoring and grammar effects in judgments of sentence acceptability,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 79(3), 1171–1182.
Cowart, W., 1997, Experimental Syntax: Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Greenbaum, S., 1976, “Syntactic frequency and acceptability,” Lingua 40(2/3), 99–113.
Greenbaum, S., 1977, “Judgments of syntactic acceptability and frequency,” Studia Linguistica 31(2), 83–105.
Lasnik, H. and Saito, M., 1984, “On the nature of proper government,” Linguistic Inquiry 15(2), 235–289.
Lodge, M., 1981, Magnitude Scaling: Quantitative Measurement of Opinions, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Nagata, H., 1989a, “Effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments under objective and subjective self-awareness conditions,” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 18(3), 255–269.
Nagata, H., 1989b, “Judgments of sentence grammaticality and field-dependence of subjects,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 69(3), 739–747.
Nagata, H., 1989c, “Repetition effects in judgments of grammaticality of sentences: Examination with ungrammatical sentences,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 68(1), 275–282.
Nagata, H., 1992, “Anchoring effects in judging grammaticality of sentences,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 75(1), 159–164.
Sorace, A., 1996, “The use of acceptability judgments in second language acquisition research,” pp. 375–409 in Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W.C. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia, eds., San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Stevens, S.S., 1975, Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects, New York: John Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keller, F. The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology, Carson T. Schütze. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8, 114–121 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008323501411
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008323501411