Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probabilities of conditionals in context

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ramseyan thesis that the probability of an indicative conditional is equal to the corresponding conditional probability of its consequent given its antecedent is both widely confirmed and subject to attested counterexamples (e.g., McGee, in Analysis 60(1):107–111, 2000; Kaufmann, in J Philos Logic 33:583–606, 2004). This raises several puzzling questions. For instance, why are there interpretations of conditionals that violate this Ramseyan thesis in certain contexts, and why are they otherwise very rare? In this paper, I raise some challenges to Stefan Kaufmann’s account of why the Ramseyan thesis sometimes fails, and motivate my own theory. On my theory, the proposition expressed by an indicative conditional is partially determined by a background partition, and hence its probability depends on the choice of such a partition. I hold that this background partition is contextually determined, and in certain conditions is set by a salient question under discussion in the context. I argue that the resulting theory offers compelling answers to the puzzling questions raised by failures of the Ramseyan thesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams E. (1970) Subjunctive and indicative conditionals. Foundations of Language, 6(1): 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams E. (1975) The logic of conditionals (Vol. 86). Synthese Library Boston, D. Reidel

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, A. (2015). Stalnaker’s thesis in context. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 8(1), 131–163.

  • Bar-Hillel M. (1980) The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44: 211–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker S. J. (1998) Predetermination and tense probabilism. Analysis, 58(4): 290–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett J. (2003) A philosophical guide to conditionals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley R. (2012) Multidemonsional possible-world semantics for conditionals. Philosophical Review, 121(4): 539–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers D., Hájek A. (2007) Ramsey + Moore = God. Analysis, 67(72): 170–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Douven I. (2008) Kaufmann on the probabilities of conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 37(3): 259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douven I. (2013) The probabilities of conditionals revisited. Cognitive Science, 37(4): 711–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell J. (2011) A flexible contextualist account of epistemic modals. Philosophers’ Imprint, 11(14): 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington D. (1991) The mystery of the missing matter of fact. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 65: 185–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington D. (1995) On conditionals. Mind, 104: 235–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington D. (1997) Truth, objectivity, counterfactuals, and Gibbard. Mind, 106(421): 107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, D. (2004). Counterfactuals and the benefit of hindsight. In P. Noordhof & P. Dowe (Eds.), Cause and chance: Causation in an indeterministic world (pp. 12–28). New York: Routledge.

  • Ellis B. (1978) A unified theory of conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7(1): 107–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. St. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Frank, A. (1997). Context dependence in modal constructions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stuttgart.

  • Gardenfors P. (1988) Knowledge in flux: Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (2004). On an ambiguity in quantified conditionals. http://ncs.ruhosting.nl/bart/papers/conditionals.pdf.

  • Geurts B. (2005) Entertaining alternatives: Disjunctions as modals. Natural Language Semantics, 13: 383–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. (1981). Two recent theories of conditionals. In W. L. Harper, R. Stalnaker, & G. Pearce (Eds.), Ifs (pp. 211-247). Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. (1995) How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4): 684–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzberg M. (2007) Context, content, and relativism. Philosophical Studies, 136: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1984). Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Groenendijk, J., & Stokhof, M. (1997). Questions. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1055-1124). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Hájek A. (1989) Probabilities of conditionals—revisited. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 18: 423–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek A. (1994) Triviality on the cheap? In: Eells E., Skyrms B. (eds) Probability and Conditionals Belief Revision and Rational Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 113–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hájek A. (2011) Triviality pursuit. Topoi, 30: 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek A. (2012) The fall of “adams’ thesis”. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 21: 145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hájek A., Hall N. (1994) The hypothesis of the conditional construal of conditional probability. In: Eells E., Skyrms B. (eds) Probability and conditionals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne J. (2005) Chance and counterfactuals. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2): 396–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffrage U., Lindsey S., Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G. (2000) Communicating statistical information. Science, 290(5500): 2261–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson F. (1979) On assertion and indicative conditionals. Philosophical Review, 88: 565–89

  • Jackson F. (1987) Conditionals. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey R. (1991) Matter-of-fact conditionals. Aristotelian Society: Supplemental, 65: 161–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80: 237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1982) Evidence impact of base rates. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. (eds) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 153–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann S. (2004) Conditioning against the grain: Abduction and indicative conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 33: 583–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann S. (2005) Conditional predictions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28: 181–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann S. (2009) Conditionals right and left: Probabilities for the whole family. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 38: 1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo J. (2013) A note on Gibbard’s proof. Philosophical Studies, 166(1): 153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo J. (2013) Conditionals, indeterminacy, and triviality. Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1): 260–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King J. C. (2013) Supplementives, the coordination account, and conflicting intentions. Philosophical Perspectives, 27: 288–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. C. (2013b). The metasemantics of contextual sensitivity. In A. Burgess & B. Sherman (Eds.), New essays in metasemantics (pp. 97–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kratzer A. (1977) What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 337–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1981) The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer H. J., Rieser H. (eds) Words, worlds, and contexts. New approaches in words semantics Berlin, de Gruyter, pp 38–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1986) Conditionals. Chicago Linguistics Society, 22(2): 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (1991) Modality. In: Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Handbuch Semantik. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 639–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer A. (2012) Collected papers on modals and conditionals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1976) Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. The Philosophical Review, 85: 297–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1981) Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59: 5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986) On the plurality of worlds. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D. (1986) Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. II. The Philosophical Review, 95: 581–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott M. (1999) Counterfactuals and access points. Mind, 108: 291–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee V. (1985) A counterexample to modus ponens. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(9): 462–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee V. (1989) Conditional probabilities and compounds of conditionals. Philosophical Review, 98: 485–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee V. (2000) To tell the truth about conditionals. Analysis, 60(1): 107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss S. (2012) On the pragmatics of counterfactuals. Nous, 46(2): 561–86

  • Moss S. (2015) On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary. Semantics & Pragmatics, 8(5): 1–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry J. (2009) Directing intentions. In: Almog J., Leonardi P. (eds) The philosophy of David Kaplan. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 187–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock J. L. (1981) A refined theory of counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 10: 239–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey P. F. (1931) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Kegan Paul,Trench Trubner & Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J.H. Yoon & A. Kathol (Eds.), Ohio State University working papers in linguistics (Vol. 49). Columbus: The Ohio State University.

  • Roberts C. (2012) Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics, 5(6): 1–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts C. (2012) Information structure: Afterword. Semantics & Pragmatics, 5(7): 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild D. (2013) Do indicative conditionals express propositions. Nous, 47(1): 49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz M. (2014) Counterfactuals and arbitrariness. Mind, 123(492): 1021–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. (1988) Conditional chance. In: Fetzer J. H. (eds) Probability and causality. Studies in epistemology, logic, pp 161–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms B. (1990) The dynamics of rational deliberation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen R. (1988) Blindspots. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen R. (2001) Vagueness and contradiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1968) A theory of conditionals. In: Rescher N. (eds) Studies in logical theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 98–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1970) Probability and conditionals. Philosophy of Science, 37(1): 64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1975) Indicative conditionals. Philosophia, 5: 269–86

  • Stalnaker R. (1976) Possible worlds. Nous, 10: 65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R. (1978) Assertion. In: Cole P. (eds) Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1980). A defense of conditional excluded middle. In W. L. Harper, G. Pearce, & R. Stalnaker (Eds.), Ifs (pp. 97–104). Dordrecht: Reidel.

  • Stalnaker R. (1984) Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker R., Jeffrey R. (1994) Conditionals as random variables. In: Eells E., Skyrms B. (eds) Probabilities and conditionals: Belief revision and rational decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (2011). Conditional propositions and conditional assertions. In A. Egan & B. Weatherson (Eds.), Epistemic modality (pp. 227–248). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Starr W. B. (2014) What ’if’? Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(10): 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen B. (1976) Probabilities of conditionals. In: Harper L. W., Hooker C. (eds) Foundations of probability theory, statistical inference, and statistical theories of science. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 261–300

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen B. (1980) Review of Brian Ellis, rational belief systems. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 10: 497–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Warmbrod K. (1983) Epistemic conditionals. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 64: 249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Willer M. (2010) New surprises for the Ramsey test. Synthese, 176: 291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams G. J. R. (2008) Conversation and conditionals. Philosophical Studies, 138: 211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson T. (1994) Vagueness. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 32-d808, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4307, USA

    Justin Khoo

Authors
  1. Justin Khoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin Khoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khoo, J. Probabilities of conditionals in context. Linguist and Philos 39, 1–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9182-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9182-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation