Skip to main content
Log in

Special Section on Argumentation and Paradoxes. Introduction

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Carel, M. and O. Ducrot: 1999, ‘Le problème du paradoxe dans une sémantique argumentative’, Langue française 123, 6-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienpointner, M.: 1991, ‘Uses and Functions of Paradoxes in Natural Language’, ISSA Newsletter 7, 2-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landheer, R.: 1996, ‘Le paradoxe: un mécanisme de bascule’, in R. Landheer and P. J. Smith (éds.), Le paradoxe en linguistique et en littérature, Genève, Droz, pp. 76-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plett, H. F.: 2001, ‘Paradox’, in Th. O. Sloane (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 551-552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1976, The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riffaterre, M.: 1996: ‘Paradoxe et présupposition’, in R. Landheer and P. J. Smith (eds.), Le paradoxe en linguistique et en littérature, Genève, Droz, pp. 149-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebohm, Th. M., 1984: Philosophie der Logik, Alber, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinowjew, A. and H. Wessel: 1975, Logische Sprachregeln, Fink, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, B. H.: 2001, ‘Logical Paradoxes’, in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/p/par-log.htm).

  • Tutescu, M.: 1996, ‘Paradoxe, univers de croyance et pertinence argumentative’, in R. Landheer and P. J. Smith (éds.), Le paradoxe en linguistique et en littérature, Droz, Genève, pp. 60-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., J. H. Beavin and D. D. Jackson: 1967, Pragmatics of Human Communication, A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kienpointner, M. Special Section on Argumentation and Paradoxes. Introduction. Argumentation 17, 43–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022970223994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022970223994

Keywords

Navigation