Skip to main content
Log in

Modal Tense and the Absolutely Unrestricted Quantifier

  • Published:
Acta Analytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I examine Takashi Yagisawa’s response to van Inwagen’s ontic objection against David Lewis. Van Inwagen criticizes Lewis’s commitment to the absolutely unrestricted sense of ‘there is,’ and Yagisawa claims that by adopting modal tenses he avoids commitment to absolutely unrestricted quantification. I argue that Yagisawa faces a problem parallel to the one Lewis faces. Although Yagisawa officially rejects the absolutely unrestricted sense of a quantifying expression, he is still committed to the absolutely unrestricted sense of ‘is a real.’

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Yagisawa (2010: 178).

  2. Yagisawa (2010: 205).

  3. To be more precise, ‘Tom is a a lawyer’ is a true as it is a evaluated at we if and only if (i) Tom is a a lawyer at we if we is a @, and (ii) Tom is p a lawyer at we if we is a not @. See Yagisawa (2010: 77–8).

  4. Yagisawa (2010: 92).

  5. Yagisawa (2010: 81–91).

  6. van Inwagen (1986: 221–2).

  7. Yagisawa (2010: 87).

  8. Yagisawa (2010: 93).

  9. Yagisawa (2010: 87).

  10. Yagisawa (2010: 92).

  11. Yagisawa (2010: 238).

References

  • Van Inwagen, Peter (1986). “Two Concepts of Possible Worlds” in French et al. Midwest Studies in Philosophy XI: Studies in Essentialism (pp. 185–213). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; reprinted in van Inwagen (2001) Ontology, Identity, and Modality: Essays in Metaphysics (pp. 206–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Yagisawa, T. (2010). Worlds and Individuals: Possible and Otherwise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seahwa Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S. Modal Tense and the Absolutely Unrestricted Quantifier. Acta Anal 27, 73–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-011-0128-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-011-0128-y

Keywords

Navigation