Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tocqueville between America and China and Democracy

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay critically revisits Jiwei Ci’s prudential argument for political democracy in China from the very Tocquevillian standpoint on which Ci’s core theoretical argument is predicated. I argue that Ci’s underlying assumption and argument regarding the enabling conditions of democracy actually depart significantly from Tocqueville’s own view due to Ci’s overly positive understanding of equality of conditions as directly constitutive of a democratic society and his assumed causal connection between capitalist society and political democracy. After clarifying what Tocqueville meant by equality of conditions and discussing his prudential remedy for the perils of democracy, I conclude by suggesting an alternative pragmatic and prudential justification for democracy in China that is more consistent with the Tocquevillian conception of democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly, Brooke A. 2005. “Is Liberalism the Only Way toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy.” Political Theory 33.4: 547–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angle, Stephen C. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert N., et al. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: Univeristy of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahoone, Lawrence E. 2002. Civil Society: The Conservative Meaning of Liberal Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, N. Serina. 2011. The Thought of Mou Zongsan. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ching, Julia. 1997. Mysticism and Kingship in China: The Heart of Chinese Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ci, Jiwei. 1994. Dialectic of the Chinese Revolution: From Utopianism to Hedonism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2014. Moral China in the Age of Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 2019. Democracy in China: The Coming Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1998. Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Dewey, John. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ______. 1981. “Democracy Is Radical.” In John Dewey: The Later Works, vol. 2, edited by Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

  • Dickson, Bruce J. 2003. Red Capitalists in China: The Party, Private Entrepreneurs and Prospects for Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elstein, David. 2012. “Mou Zongsan’s New Confucian Democracy.” Contemporary Political Theory 11.2: 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, Paul. 2014. “Tocqueville and Nietzsche on the Problem of Human Greatness in Democracy.” Review of Politics 76.3: 439–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frőhlich, Thomas. 2017. Tang Junyi: Confucian Philosophy and the Challenge of Modernity. Leiden: Brill.

  • He, Baogang, and Mark E. Warren. 2011. “Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development.” Perspectives on Politics 9.2: 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Marc M. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalberg, Stephen. 1997. “Tocqueville and Weber on the Sociological Origins of Citizenship: The Political Culture of American Democracy.” Citizenship Studies 1.2.: 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean, John. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sungmoon. 2014. Confucian Democracy in East Asia: Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2016. Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • ______. 2018. Democracy after Virtue: Toward Pragmatic Confucian Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lee, Janghee. 2004. Xunzi and Early Chinese Naturalism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. The Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machle, Edward J. 1993. Nature and Heaven in the Xunzi: A Study of the Tian Lun. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Manent, Pierre. 1996. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Trans. by John Waggoner. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Mansfield, Harvey. 2010. Tocqueville: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: A Touchstone Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, Nancy L. 1998. Membership and Morals: The Personal Uses of Pluralism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America. Trans. by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Tseng, Roy. 2020. “Political Meritocracy versus Ethical Democracy: The Confucian Political Ideal Revisited.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 46.9.: 1033–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Weiming. 1979. Humanity and Self-Cultivation. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa, Dana. 2005. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” Review of Politics 67.4.: 659–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ______. 2008. Public Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Walder, Andrew G. 1988. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Cheryl B. 2013. “Deliberating Democratization with Tocqueville: The Case of East Asia.” In Tocqueville and the Frontiers of Democracy, edited by Ewa Atanassow and Richard Boyd. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sungmoon Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S. Tocqueville between America and China and Democracy. Dao 21, 431–449 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09841-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-022-09841-z

Keywords

Navigation