Skip to main content
Log in

The Sacred/Secular Divide and the Christian Worldview

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many employees with strong religious convictions find themselves living in two separate worlds: the sacred private world of family and church where they can express their faith freely and the secular public world where religious expression is strongly discouraged. We examine the origins of sacred/secular divide, and show how this division is an outcome of modernism replacing Christianity as the dominant worldview in western society. Next, we make the case that guiding assumptions (or faith) is inherent in every worldview, system of thought, or religion and also show that scientific reason can never be a comprehensive or totalizing meaning system, particularly in the realm of ethics. The underlying assumptions of the sacred/secular divide are seriously questioned which has implications for employees who desire to integrate faith and career. Finally, we offer possibilities for individuals and corporate entities to integrate the personal and sacred with the institutional and secular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ariely, D. (2010). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1977). Facing up to modernity: Excursions in society, politics, and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71, 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calkins, M. (2000). Recovering religion’s prophetic voice for business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, K. R. (2004). Christian perspectives on business ethics: Faith, profit, and decision-making. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 23(4), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson, C. W., & Pearcey, N. R. (1999). How now shall we live? Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, R. 1996. Business and Ethics. http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4227383/k.FE33/Business_and_Ethics.htm.

  • Daniels, D., Franz, R. S., & Wong, K. (2000). A classroom with a worldview: Making spiritual assumptions explicit in management education. Journal of Management Education, 24(5), 540–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1922). Reconstruction in philosophy. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5, 6), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fort, T. L. (1996). Religious belief, corporate leadership, and business ethics. American Business Law Journal, 33(3), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2010). An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age. New York, NY: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D. (1991). Modern marketing theory: Critical issues in the philosophy of marketing science. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. New York, NY: Longmans, Green & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1871/2008. The critique of pure reason, trans. Marcus Weigelt and Max Muller, (Penguin Classics: New York, NY).

  • Kaufmann, S. A. (2010). Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science reason and religion. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., Fisher, D., & McCalman, D. (2009). Modernism, Christianity, and business ethics: A worldview perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattox, R. (1978). The Christian employee. South Plainfield, NJ: Bridge Publishing, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L. (1994). Believers in business: Resolving the tension between Christian faith, business ethics, competition and our definitions of success. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, L. (1974). Secular work is full-time service. Fort Washington, PA: Christian Literature Crusade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcey, N. R. (2004). Total truth: Liberating Christianity from its cultural captivity. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G. J. (1994). Business ethics: Where have all the Christians gone? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(7), 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryken, L. (1986). Worldly saints. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, F. A. (1982). Escape from reason, in the complete works of Francis A. Schaeffer (Vol. 1). Wheaton, IL: Crossway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sire, J. (1997). The universe next door: A basic worldview catalog. Dowers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starke, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swatos, W. H., Jr., & Christiano, K. J. (1999). Secularization theory: The course of a concept. Sociology of Religion, 60, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veith, G. E. (1994). Postmodern times: A Christian guide to contemporary thought and culture. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, B., & Middleton, J. (1984). The transforming vision. Dowers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaman, H. R. (2003). Skinner’s naturalism as a paradigm for teaching business ethics: A discussion from tourism. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(2), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, D., McCalman, D. & Fisher, D. The Sacred/Secular Divide and the Christian Worldview. J Bus Ethics 109, 203–208 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1119-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1119-z

Keywords

Navigation