Skip to main content
Log in

What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the dimensional consequences of (a) having positive prior corporate associations and (b) negative prior corporate associations in times of product-harm crisis by applying two dimensions of corporate associations (corporate ability vs. corporate social responsibility). The findings indicate that the disadvantages of having negative prior corporate ability (CA) associations are bigger than having negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations in times of product-harm crisis, whereas the advantages of having positive prior CSR associations are bigger than having positive CA associations. This study also provides directions for how to manage reputational strengths and weaknesses prior to a crisis as part of reputation and crisis management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For each crisis type, the study included the conditions of (1) PCA, (2) PCSR, (3) NCA, (4) NCSR, (5) PCA + NCSR combination, (6) NCA + PCSR combination, and (7) control (no CA/CSR).

References

  • Afifi, W. A., & Burgoon, J. K. (2000). The impact of violations on uncertainty and the consequences for attractiveness. Human Communication Research, 26 (2), 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15 (3), 365–392. doi:10.1177/0265-7598153004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37 (2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basil, M. D., Brown, W. J., & Bocarnea, M. C. (2002). Differences in univariate values versus multivariate relationships. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 501–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C., & Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-quality trade-off: When can corporate social responsibility and corporate ability compensate each other?. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252. doi:10.1007/s1055-006-9232-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehal, G. J., & Sheinin, D. A. (2007). The influence of corporate messages on the product portfolio. Journal of Marketing, 71 (April), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61 (January), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K.N., Wengreen, H.J., Dimmick, M., Eller, K., Frampton, A., Heaton, E.L., Staheli, T., & Christensen, N.K. (2011). Improving diets of college students: Survey of dietary habits and focus group perspectives on how to best teach students. Journal of Health Behavior and Public Health, 1(1), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. A., & White, C. L.(2011). Organization-Public relationships and crisis response strategies: Impact on attribution of responsibility. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12(1–2), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., & LePoire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20 (1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burson-Marsteller & Penn Schoen Berland (2011). 2011 crisis reputation preparedness study. http://www.burson-marsteller.com/Innovationandinsights/blogsandpodcasts/BMBlog/Documents/BM20and%20PSB%20Crisis%20Preparedness20Study202011.pdf.

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Kline, S. & Dai, Y. (2005). Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase Intention: A dual-process model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17 (3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W., & Worrell, D. (1992). Research notes and communications: The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 467–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, G., & Hempelmann, B. (2011). Impacts of reputation for quality on perceptions of company responsibility and product-related dangers in times of product-recall and public complains crises: Results from an empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 264–283. doi:10.1057/crr.2010.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., Sullivan, L.A., & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman, Y. M., & Rafaeli, S. (2011). Online pauses and silence: Chronemic expectancy violations in written computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 38 (1), 54–69. doi:10.1177/0093650210378229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalman, Y. M., Ravid, G., Raban, D. R., & Rafaeli, S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: A chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2011). Transferring effects of CSR strategy on consumer responses: The synergistic model of corporate communication strategy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 23(2), 218–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. & Haley, E., & Koo, G. (2009). Comparison of the paths from consumer involvement types to ad responses between corporate advertising and product advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Rader, C. S. (2010). What they can do versus how much they care: Assessing corporate communication strategies on Fortune 500 websites. Journal of Communication Management, 14(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers’ attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H. H., Bailom, F., & Sauerwein, E. (1996). How to delight our customers. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 5(2), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packaged Facts. (2010, July). Prepared foods and ready-to-eat foods at retail: The new competition to foodservice. Retrieved August 24, 2011 from Marketing Research Report database.

  • Romani S., Grappi S., & Bagozzi R. P. (2012). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values, Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1337-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K. H., & Kim, S. (in press). I want to be friends with you: How effective are organizations’ interpersonal approaches on Facebook? Journal of Public Relations Research.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sora Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S. What’s Worse in Times of Product-Harm Crisis? Negative Corporate Ability or Negative CSR Reputation?. J Bus Ethics 123, 157–170 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1808-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1808-x

Keywords

Navigation