Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T17:34:57.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Harold Kincaid
Harold Kincaid*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advances in molecular biology have generally been taken to support the claim that biology is reducible to chemistry. I argue against that claim by looking in detail at a number of central results from molecular biology and showing that none of them supports reduction because (1) their basic predicates have multiple realizations, (2) their chemical realization is context-sensitive and (3) their explanations often presuppose biological facts rather than eliminate them. I then consider the heuristic and confirmational implications of irreducibility and argue that purely biochemical approaches are likely to be unsound and to be unable to confirm an important range of statements. I conclude by sketching criteria for scientific unity that do not entail reducibility and yet leave an important place for identifying underlying mechanisms. Molecular biology, properly understood, provides an excellent paradigm of non-reductive unity between different explanatory levels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 575 - 593
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

A shorter version of this paper was presented at the American Society for Cell Biology, December 1986. Karl Matlin made extensive comments on earlier drafts as well as contributing substantially to the basic arguments presented here through conversations over many years. Robin Lessel and a referee for this journal made helpful comments. Work on this paper was supported by a fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.

References

Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Watson, J. (1983), Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Batenburg, A., Brasseur, R., Ruysschaert, J., Scharrenburg, G., Slotboom, A., Demel, R., and Krkuijff, B. (1988), “Characterization of the Interfacial Behavior and Structure of the Signal Sequence of Escherichia coli Outer Membrane Pore Protein”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry 263: 4202–4207.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68909-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berridge, M. (1985), “The Molecular Basis of Communication Within the Cell”, Scientific American 253: 142–152.10.1038/scientificamerican1085-142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biobel, G., and Dobberstein, B. (1975), “Transfer of Proteins Across Membranes”, The Journal of Cell Biology 67: 835–862.Google Scholar
Creighton, T. (1984), Proteins. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google ScholarPubMed
Dalbey, R., and Wickner, W. (1987), “Leader Peptidase of Escherichia coli: Critical Role of a Small Domain in Membrane Assembly”, Science 235: 783–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elster, K. (1986), “Reply to Comments”, Inquiry 29: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L., and Maull, N. (1977), “Interfield Theories”, Philosophy of Science 11: 43–64.10.1086/288723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidelio, G., Austen, B., Chapman, D., and Lucy, J. (1986), “Properties of Signal Sequence Peptides at an Air-Water Interface”, Biochemical Journal 238: 301–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fjose, A., McGinnis, W., and Gehring, W. (1985), “Isolation of a Homeo Box-Containing Gene from the Engrailed Region of Drosophila and the Spatial Distribution of its Transcripts”, Nature 313: 284–289.10.1038/313284a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedlander, M., and Blobel, G. (1985), “Bovine Opsin Has More Than One Signal Sequence”, Nature 318: 338–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gehring, W. (1985), “The Molecular Basis of Development”, Scientific American 253: 152–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfarb, D., Gariepy, J., Schoolnik, G., Kornberg, R. (1986), “Synthetic Peptides as Nuclear Localization Signals”, Nature 322: 641–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hay, R., Bohni, P., and Gasser, S. (1984), “How Mitochondria Import Proteins”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 779: 65–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellman, G., and Thompson, F. (1975), “Physicalism: Ontology, Determination and Reduction”, Journal of Philosophy 72: 551–564.10.2307/2025067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. (1974), The Philosophy of Biological Science. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1986), “Teleology and Reduction in Biology”, Biology and Philosophy 1: 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, C., Preuss, D., Grisafi, P., and Botstein, D. (1987), “Many Random Sequences Functionally Replace the Secretion Signal Sequence of Yeast Invertase”, Science 235: 312–318.10.1126/science.3541205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kincaid, H. (1986), “Reduction, Explanation and Individualism”, Philosophy of Science 53: 492–514.10.1086/289337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, H. (1987), “Supervenience Doesn't Entail Reducibility”, Southern Journal of Philosophy 25: 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, H. (1988), “Supervenience and Explanation”, Synthese 77: 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1982), “Genes”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 337–359.10.1093/bjps/33.4.337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1984), “1953 and All That. A Tale of Two Sciences”, Philosophical Review 43: 335–374.10.2307/2184541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnhardt, S., Pollit, S., and Inouye, M. (1987), “The Differential Effect on Two Hybrid Proteins of Deletion Mutations Within the Hydrophobic Region of the Escherichia coli OmpA Signal Peptide”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry 262: 1716–1719.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)75697-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maull, N. (1977), “Unifying Science Without Reduction”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 9: 143–162.10.1016/0039-3681(77)90012-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D. (1985), “Protein Secretion in Escherichia coli”, Annual Review of Microbiology 39: 615–648.10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.003151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, P., Kyle, J., Miller, R., Pantano, J., Grubb, J., and Sly, W. (1988), “Rat Liver B-glucuronidase”, Biochemistry Journal 250: 547–555.10.1042/bj2500547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. (1986), “Reduction, Explanation, and the Quests of Biological Research”, Philosophy of Science 53: 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1985), The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (1989), “From Reductionism to Instrumentalism”, in M. Ruse (ed.), What the Philosophy of Biology Is. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (1976), “Reduction in Genetics”, PSA 1974: 653–670.Google Scholar
Sabatini, D., Kreibaich, G., Morimoto, M., and Adesnik, M. (1982), “Mechanisms for the Incorporation of Proteins in Membranes and Organelles”, The Journal of Cell Biology 92: 1–22.10.1083/jcb.92.1.1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaffner, K. (1967), “Approaches to Reduction”, Philosophy of Science 34: 137–147.10.1086/288137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. (1969), “The Watson-Crick Model and Reductionism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20: 325–348.10.1093/bjps/20.4.325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, S. (1985), “The Molecular Basis of Communication Between Cells”, Scientific American 253: 132–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tonegawa, S. (1985), “The Molecules of the Immune System”, Scientific American 253: 122–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walter, P., Ibrahimi, I., and Blobel, G. (1981), “Translocation of Proteins Across the Endoplasmic Reticulum”, Journal of Cell Biology 91: 545–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, K. and Osborn, M. (1985), “The Molecules of the Cell Matrix”, Scientific American 252: 100–110.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. (1975), “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in G. Globus, T. Maxwell and J. Savodnik (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R. (1977), Reduction in the Physical Sciences. Halifax: Canadian Association for Publishing in Philosophy.Google Scholar