Abstract
This paper explores how using a “domains of ethics analysis” approach might constructively contribute to an enhanced understanding (among those without specialized ethics training) of ethically-complex health care practices through the consideration of one such sample practice, i.e., deep and continuous palliative sedation (DCPS). For this purpose, I select four sample ethics domains (from a variety of possible relevant domains) for use in the consideration of this practice, i.e., autonomous choice, motives, actions and consequences. These particular domains were choosen because of their relevance to the analysis of DCPS and their relative ease of access to those without ethics training. The analysis demonstrates that such an approach could facilitate the emergence of accessible arguments and discussion points that could enhance the understanding and appreciation of this and other health care practices with strong ethics dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battin, M. P. (2008). Terminal sedation: Pulling the sheet over our eyes. Hastings Center Report, 38(5), 27–30.
Claessens, P., Menten, J., Schotsmans, P., et al. (2008). Palliative sedation: A review of the research literature. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 36(3), 310–333.
Cooney, G. A. (2005). Palliative sedation: The ethical controversy. Medscape Nurses.
Douglas, C., Kerridge, I., & Ankeny, R. (2008). Managing intentions: The end-of-life administration of analgesics and sedatives, and the possibility of slow euthanasia. Bioethics, 22(7), 388–396.
Jansen, L. A., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2002). Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: Careful conversation about care an the end of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136(11), 845–849.
Kingsbury, R. J., & Ducharme, H. M. (2002). Two perspectives on total/terminal/palliative sedation. Available at http://CBHD.org/.
Lo, B., & Rubenfeld, G. (2005). Palliative sedation in dying patients. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(14), 1810–1816.
Morita, T. (2004). Palliative sedation to relieve psycho-existential suffering of terminally ill cancer patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 28(5), 445–450.
Morita, T., Tei, Y., & Inoue, S. (2003). Ethical validity of palliative sedation therapy. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(2), 103–105.
Muller-busch, H. C., Oduncu, F. S., Woskanjan, S., et al. (2005). Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation—a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 7(3), 333–339.
Pautex, S., & Zulian, G. B. (2006). To sedate or not to sedate? Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 12(3), 105–107.
Pimple, K. D. (2005). Six domains of research ethics: A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8, 191–205.
Pojman, L. P. (Ed.). (1998). Ethical theory: Classical and contemporary readings (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Quill, T. E. (2008). Physician-assisted death in the United States: Are the existing “last resorts” enough? Hastings Center Report, 38(5), 17–26.
Quill, T. E., Dresser, R., & Brock, D. W. (1997). The rule of double effect—A critique of its role in end-of-life decision making. The New England Journal of Medicine, 337(24), 1768–1771.
Rietjens, A. C., van Delden, J. M., van der Heide, A., et al. (2006). Terminal sedation and euthanasia: A comparison of clinical practices. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 749–753.
Rousseau, P. (2001). Existential suffering and palliative sedation: A brief commentary with a proposal for clinical guidelines. American Journal of Hospital Palliative Care, 18(151), 151–153.
Thomas, G., & Durant, J. (1987). Why should we promote the public understanding of science? Scientific Literary Papers: A Journal of Research in Science, Education and Research (pp. 1–14). Department of External Studies, University of Oxford.
van Delden, J. J. (2007). Terminal sedation: Source of a restless ethical debate. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 187–188.
Verkerk, M., Lindemann, H., Maeckelberghe, E., et al. (2004). An interpersonal exercise in ethics education. Hastings Center Report, 34(6), 31–38.
Verkerk, M., van Wijlick, E., Legemaate, J., et al. (2007). A national guideline for palliative sedation in The Netherlands. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 34(6), 666–670.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirby, J. Accessing the Ethics of Complex Health Care Practices: Would a “Domains of Ethics Analysis” Approach Help?. HEC Forum 22, 133–143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9129-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-010-9129-2