Abstract
The paper is a discussion of the idealizational interpretation of the dialectical Marxist methodology of science which has been worked out and applied in a diversity of ways by L. Nowak and the other members of the so-called Poznań school. I examine the sense in which, and the extent to which, this methodology is or can be said to be dialectical. Subsequently, I discuss and criticize Nowak's claim that this methodology can function at the same time as a meta-methodology; I do this in connection with a corresponding and equally questionable claim put forward by I. Lakatos, and with one of Nowak's concrete examples, which is meant to show that certain developments in neopositivist methodology of science followed his (meta-)methodology. Lastly, I comment on the normative-descriptive character of Nowak's methodology, examine its adequacy as a comprehensive account of science, compare it with alternative accounts of the place and role of idealizations in science, and raise the question of whether Nowak's idealizational theory of socio-economic formation is a refutation or a dialectical negation of Marx's historical materialism.
Bibliography
W. F. Barr,: 1971, ‘A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Idealizations in Science’,Philosophy of Science 38, 258–272.
W. Diederich, and H. F. Fulda: 1978, ‘Sneed'sche Strukturen in Marx'Kapital’,Neue Hefte für Philosophie 13, 47–80.
C. G. Hempel: 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays (Free Press, New York).
I. Lakatos: 1970, ‘History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’,Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, 91–134. Reprinted in I. Lakatos,The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Philosophical Papers Volume 1), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/London/New York/Melbourne, 1978, pp. 102–138.
E. McMullin: 1978, ‘Philosophy of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’, in G. Radnitzky and G. Andersson (eds.),Progress and Rationality in Science (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht/Boston/London), pp. 221–252.
L. Nowak: 1977, ‘On the Structure of Marxist Dialectics (An Attempt Towards a Categorial Interpretation)’,Erkenntnis 11, 341–363.
L. Nowak: 1980,The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht/Boston/London).
I. Nowakowa, and L. Nowak: 1978, ‘Marxism and Positivism: The Idea of a Scientific Philosophy’,Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities 4.
H. Radder: 1982, ‘An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos' Account of the “Degenerating Phase” of Bohr's Atomic Theory’,Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIII/1, 99–109.
D. Shapere: 1969, ‘Notes Toward a Post-Positivistic Interpretation of Science’, in P. Achinstein and S. F. Barker (eds.),The Legacy of Logical Positivism (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore), pp. 115–160.
F. Suppe: 1971, ‘Theoretical Laws’, in M. Prezełeckiet al. (eds.),Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences (D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht/Boston/London), pp. 247–267.
F. Suppe: 1979, ‘Theory Structure’, in P. D. Asquith and H. E. Kyburg, Jr. (eds.).Current Research in Philosophy of Science (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing), pp. 317–338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kirschenmann, P.P. Neopositivism, Marxism, and idealization: Some comments on Professor Nowak's paper. Studies in Soviet Thought 30, 219–235 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043888
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01043888