Published June 23, 2019 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Kant's Analogy between the Moral Law and the Law of Nature

Creators

  • 1. Ludwig-Maximilian University

Description

In the Groundwork Kant refers to the analogy between the moral law and the law of nature when clarifying the concept of the categorical imperative. However, in the Groundwork itself, he does not give any further explanation as to why he introduces the analogy. Therefore, I take the Groundwork as a starting point of my article, but then I explicate on the analogy from a broader perspective, focusing especially on his lecture courses Moral Mrongovius II and Naturrecht Feyerabend as well as on his Typic chapter of the second Critique.

Notes

Dr. Manja Kisner, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Files

11. CTK9 Art Kisner.pdf

Files (390.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f6b814302c1276e6bcb8e628ed0471c6
390.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Busch, W. (1979), Die Entstehung der kritischen Rechtsphilosophie Kants, De Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
  • Delfosse, H. et al. (2010), "Stellenindex und Konkordanz zum Naturrecht Feyerabend. Einleitung des Naturrechts Feyerabend. Forschungen und Materialien zur deutschen Aufklärung. Division III". Indices", in: Kant-Index. Section 2: Indices zum Kantschen Ethikcorpus. Vol. 30.1, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt.
  • Guyer, P. (2002), "Kant's Deductions of the Principles of Right", in: Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 23–64.
  • Hirsch, P.A. (2012), Kants Einleitung in die Rechtslehre von 1784. Immanuel Kants Rechtsbegriff in der Moralvorlesung "Mrongovius II" und der Naturrechtsvorlesung "Feyerabend" von 1784 sowie in der "Metaphysik der Sitten" von 1797, Universitätsverlag, Göttingen, Göttingen.
  • Massimi, M. (2014), "Prescribing laws to nature. Part I. Newton, the pre-Critical Kant, and three problems about the lawfulness of nature", Kant-Studien, 105 (4), pp. 491–508.
  • Pollok, K. (2017), Kant's Theory of Normativity: The Space of Reason, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • Ritter, C. (1971), Der Rechtsgedanke Kants nach den frühen Quellen, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
  • Watkins, E. (2017), "Kant on the Unity and Diversity of Laws", in: Michela Massimi and Angela Breitenbach (eds.), Kant and the Laws of Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 11-29.
  • Watkins, E. (2014), "What is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?", Kant-Studien, 105 (4), pp. 471–490.
  • Westra, A. (2016), The Typic in Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: Moral Judgment and Symbolic Representation, De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston.
  • Willaschek, M. (2002), "Which Imperatives for Right", in: Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 65–88.
  • Wood, A. (2002), "The Final Form of Kant's Practical Philosophy", in: Mark Timmons (ed.), Kant's Metaphysics of morals: Interpretative Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–22.
  • Zimmermann, S. (2015), "Wovon handelt Kants Typik der reinen praktischen Urteilskraft?", Kant-Studien, 106 (3), pp. 430–460.
  • Zöller, Günter (2015), "Without hope and fear: Kant's Naturrecht Feyerabend on Bindingness and Obligation", in: Robert R. Clewis (ed.), Reading Kant's Lectures, De Gruyter Berlin/Boston, pp. 346–361.