Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:19:30.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reviving the Sociology of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Philip Kitcher
Philip Kitcher*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
*
‡Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I compare recent work in the sociology of scientific knowledge with other types of sociological research. On this basis I urge a revival of the sociology of science, offer a tentative agenda, and attempt to show how the questions I raise might be addressed.

Type
Metaphilosophy and the History of the Philosophy of Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S33 - S44
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am grateful to Bruce Glymour for several conversations that inspired me to consider the relationships between sociology of science and other parts of sociology, and to Harry Collins and John Dupré for their vigorous (but constructive) disagreements.

References

Bloor, David (1991), Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brock, William A. and Durlauf, Steven N. (forthcoming), “A Formal Model of Theory Choice in Science,” typescript.Google Scholar
Cole, Stephen (1992), Making Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Harry M. (1985), Changing Order. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Epstein, Steven (1996), Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Hands, D. Wade (1994), “Blurred Boundaries: Recent Changes in the Relationship between Economics and the Philosophy of Science,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 751–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. (1988), Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, John and Martin, Ben R. (1984), Foresight in Science. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher (1994), The Homeless. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1985), Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (1990), “The Division of Cognitive Labor,” Journal of Philosophy 87: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (1993), The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (1998), “A Plea For Science Studies,” in Koertge, Noretta (ed.), A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ben R. and Irvine, John (eds.) (1989), Research Foresight: Priority-Setting in Science. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. (1976), Plagues and Peoples. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip (1996), “The Economic Consequences of Philip Kitcher”, Social Epistemology 10: 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon (1985), Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney (1996), The Rise of Christianity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulloway, Frank J. (1996), Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar