Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Berzelian Formulas as Paper Tools in Early Nineteenth-Century Chemistry

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the semiotic,epistemological and historical aspects of Berzelianformulas in early nineteenth-century organicchemistry. I argue that Berzelian formulas wereenormously productive `paper tools' for representingchemical reactions of organic substances, and forcreating different pathways of reactions. Moreover, myanalysis of Jean Dumas's application of Berzelianformulas to model the creation of chloral from alcoholand chlorine exemplifies the role played by chemicalformulas in conceptual development (the concept ofsubstitution). Studying the dialectic of chemists'collectively shared goals and tools, I argue thatpaper tools, like laboratory instruments, areresources whose possibilities are not exhausted byscientists' attempts to achieve existing goals, butrather whose applications generate new goals. The term`paper tools' is introduced to emphasize that thepragmatic and syntactic aspects of symbol systems arefully comparable to physical laboratory tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Rudolf Arnheim. Visual Thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöns Jacob Berzelius. Experiments on the Nature of Azote, of Hydrogen, and of Ammonia, and Upon the Degrees of Oxidation of Which Azote is Susceptible. Annals of Philosophy 2: 276-284, 357–368, 1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöns Jacob Berzelius. Essay on the Cause of Chemical Proportions, and on Some Circumstances Relating to Them; Together with a Short and Easy Method of Expressing Them. Annals of Philosophy 3: 51-62, 93–106, 244–257, 353–364, 1814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöns Jacob Berzelius. Betrachtungen über die Zusammensetzung der organischen Atome. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 28: 617-630, 1833.

    Google Scholar 

  • William H. Brock. The Norton History of Chemistry. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Hedley Brooke. Berzelius, the Dualistic Hypothesis, and the Rise of Organic Chemistry. In: Evan M. Melhado and Tore Frängsmyr (Eds.), Enlightenment Science in the Romantic Era, pp. 180-221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy Cartwright. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy Cartwright, Towfic Shomar and Mauricio Suárez. The Tool Box of Science. Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity Example. In: William E. Herfel et al. (Eds.), Theories and Models in Scientific Processes, pp. 137-149. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Cavanna and S. Rocchictta. Il linguaggio simbolica della chimica. Minerva Farmaceutica 8: 204-208, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Caven and J.A. Cranston. Symbols and Formulae in Chemistry. London and Glasgow: Blackie & Son Limited, 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice Crosland. Historical Studies in the Language of Chemistry. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • François Dagognet. Tableaux et Language de la Chimie. Paris: Edition du Seuil, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • John Dalton. A New System of Chemical Philosophy, 2 vols: vol. 1, part 1. Manchester: S. Russell, 1808; part 2, Manchester: Russell & Allen, 1810; vol. 2, Manchester: Executers of S. Russell, 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Baptiste André Dumas. Traité de Chimie appliquée aux Arts, 8 vols. Paris: Béchet Jeune, 1828–1846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Baptiste André Dumas. Recherches de Chimie organique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 56: 113-150, 1834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Baptiste André Dumas. Mémoire sur la loi des substitutions et la théorie des types. Comptes Rendus 10: 149-178, 1840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jean Baptiste André Dumas and Polydore Boullay. Mémoire sur la Formation de l'Ether sulfurique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 36: 294-310, 1827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoine François Fourcroy and Nicolas L. Vauquelin. De l'action de l'acide sulfurique sur l'alcool, et de la formation de l'ether. Annales de Chimie 23: 203-215, 1797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eric Francoeur. The Forgotten Tool: The Design and Use of Molecular Models. Social Studies of Science 27: 7-40, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Galison. How Experiments End. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter Galison. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac. Lettre de M. Gay-Lussac à M. Clément, sur l'analyse de l'alcool et de l'éther sulfurique, et sur les produits de la fermentation. Annales de Chimie 95: 311-318, 1815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac. Sur l'Alteration qu'éprouve l'acide sulfrique en agissant sur l'alcool. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 13: 62-79, 1820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Goodman. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis (Cambridge): Hackett Publishing Company, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Hacking. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Hacking. The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences. In: A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, pp. 29-64. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roald Hoffmann and Pierre Laszlo. Representation in Chemistry. Diogenes 147: 23-51, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roald Hoffmann. Representation in Chemistry. Angewandte Chemie 30(1): 1-16, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederic L. Holmes. Justus von Liebig. In: Charles Coulston Gillispic (Ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, pp. 329-350. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron J. Ihde. The Development of Modern Chemistry. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. Verbindung und Affinität. Die Grundlegung der neuzeitlichen Chemie an der Wende vom 17. zum 18. Jahrhundert. Basel: Birkhäuser, 1994a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. Origin of the Concept of Chemical Compound. Science in Context 7(2): 163-204, 1994b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. The Chemical Workshop Tradition and the Experimental Practice — Discontinuities within Continuities. Science in Context 9(3): 251-287, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. Paving a Way through the Jungle of Organic Chemistry — Experimenting within Changing Systems of Order. In: Michael Heidelberger and Friedrich Steinle (Eds.), Experimental Essays — Versuche zum Experiment, pp. 251-271. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. Paper-Tools and Techniques of Modelling in Nineteenth-Century Chemistry. In: M. Morgan and M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as Mediators, pp. 146-167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursula Klein. Experimente, Modelle, Paper-Tools: Kulturen der Organischen Chemie im 19. Jahrhundert. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Konstanz, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto Krätz. Zur Geschichte der organisch-chemischen Formelschreibweise. Physis 15: 157-177, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre Laszlo. La parole des choses ou la language de la chimie. Paris: Hermann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour. Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno Latour and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Liebig. Ueber die Verbindungen, welche durch die Einwirkung des Chlors auf Alkohol, Aether, ölbildendes Gas und Essiggeist entstehen. Annalen der Pharmacie 1: 182-230, 1832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Liebig. Ueber die Constitution des Aethers und seiner Verbindungen. Annalen der Pharmacie 9: 1-39, 1834.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.S. Mason. History of the Use of Graphic Formulas in Organic Chemistry. Isis 34: 346-354, 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Morgan and Margret Morrison (Eds.), Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Jo Nye. From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry: Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines, 1800–1950. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Partington. The Origin of Modern Chemical Symbols and Formulae. The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry 55: 759-762, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.R. Partington. A History of Chemistry, 4 vols. New York, NY: Martino Publishing, 1961–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew Pickering. The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew Pickering (Ed.). Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter J. Ramberg. Arthur Michael's Critique of Stereochemistry, 1887–1899. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 26: 89-138, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand O. Ramsey. Molecules in Three Dimensions (I). Chemistry 47(1): 6-9, 1974a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand O. Ramsey. Molecules in Three Dimensions (II). Chemistry 47(2): 6-11, 1974b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand O. Ramsey. Stereochemistry. London: Heyden, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. Toward a History of Epistemic Things. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alan J. Rocke. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannizzaro. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clin J. Suckling, Keith E. Suckling and Charles W. Suckling. Chemistry Through Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Walden. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der chemischen Zeichen. In: Edmund O. von Lippmann (Ed.), Studien zur Geschichte der Chemie, Festausgabe, pp. 80-105. Berlin: Springer, 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Walker. Chemical Symbols and Formulae. Nature 111: 883-886, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen J. Weininger. Contemplating the Finger: Visuality and the Semiotics of Chemistry. Hyle 4(1): 3-27, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • William Whewell. On the Employment of Notation in Chemistry. Journal of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 1: 437-453, 1831.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Wilhelmstraße 44, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Ursula Klein

Authors
  1. Ursula Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, U. Berzelian Formulas as Paper Tools in Early Nineteenth-Century Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry 3, 7–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011460318779

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011460318779

Keywords

Search

Navigation