Abstract
Although it is now widely recognised by business leaders that their companies need to accept a broader responsibility than short-term profits, recent research suggests that as corporate social responsibility (CSR) and social reporting become more widespread, there is little empirical evidence of the range of stakeholders addressed through their CSR programmes and how such programmes are reported. Through a CSR framework which was developed in an exploratory study, we explore the nature of stakeholder relationships reported across leading FTSE companies and the importance they attach to communicating both social and business outcomes. It is evident from the hypotheses tested that the bigger FTSE companies, particularly extraction companies and telecoms, are more adept at identifying and prioritising their stakeholders, and linking CSR programmes to business and social outcomes. However, we draw the general conclusion that building stronger stakeholder relationships through CSR programmes – other than with customers – is not currently a priority for most companies. We also conclude that a limited sophistication in managing multiple stakeholders may compromise the impact of CSR upon business and social results. Finally, the managerial implications and the contribution of our study are discussed before closing with an acknowledgement of the limitations of this work and suggestions for further research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accountability: 2002, Accountability Primer: Socially responsible investment. http://www.accountability.org.uk/uploadstore/cms/docs/SociallyResponsibleInvestment.pdf.
Bartolomeo, M. and G. Famillari: 2004, Avanzi SRI Research, 'Green, Social and Ethical Funds in Europe', October. http://www.avanzi-sri.org/pdf/Complete_report_2004_final.pdf.
H. R. Bowen (1953) Social Responsibilities of the Business Man Harper & Row New York
A. B. Carroll (1979) ArticleTitleA Three-Dimensional Model of Corporate Performance Academy of Management Review 4 IssueID4 497–505
Carroll, A. B.: 1991, 'The Pyramid of Corporal Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organisational Stakeholders', Business Horizons Jul–Aug, 39–48.
M. Clarkson (1995) ArticleTitleA Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 92–117
T. Copeland J. Weston (1998) Financial Theory and Corporate Policy Addison-Wesley Reading, Mass
H. Davidson (2002) The Committed Enterprise Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford
G. Day D. B. Montgomery (1999) ArticleTitleCharting New Directions for Marketing Journal of Marketing 63 3–13
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Trade and Industry (2001) Business and Society: Developing Corporate Social Responsibility in the UK HMSO UK
InstitutionalAuthorNameDepartment of Trade and Industry (2002) Business and Society: Corporate Social Responsibility 2002 HMSO UK
T. Donaldson L. Present (1995) ArticleTitleThe Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID1 65–91
K. Eisenhardt (1989) ArticleTitleBuilding Theories from Case study Research Academy of Management Review 14 IssueID2 532–555
Elkington, J.: 2003, Launch of AA1000 Conference. London. Accountability.org.uk.
FTSE: 2004, http://www.ftse.com/ftse4good/criteria_methodology.jsp.
M. Friedman (1970) ArticleTitleThe Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits New York Times Magazine New York Sept. 13 32–33
J. Frooman (1999) ArticleTitleStakeholder Influence Strategies Academy of Management Review 24 IssueID2 191–205
B. Googins S. Rochlin (2000) ArticleTitleCreating the Partnership Society: Understanding the Rhetoric and Reality of Cross-Sectoral Partnerships Business and Society Review 105 IssueID1 127–144 Occurrence Handle10.1111/0045-3609.00068
E. Von Hippel (1986) ArticleTitle'Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts Management Science 34 IssueID7 791–805
E. Von Hippel (1989) ArticleTitleNew Product Ideas from Lead Users Research Technology Management 32 IssueID3 24–28
Holt, D. B., J. A. Quelch and E. L. Tabiinndfdfdfylor: 2004, 'How Global Brands Compete', Harvard Business Review, Sept–Oct, 68–75.
T. Jones (1995) ArticleTitleInstrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics Academy of Management Review 20 IssueID2 404–437
N. Klein (1999) No Logo: Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies Picador New York
S. D. Knox D. Walker (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring and Managing Brand Loyalty Journal of Strategic Marketing 9 IssueID2 111–128
S. D. Knox D. Walker (2003) ArticleTitleEmpirical Developments in the Measurement of Involvement, Brand Loyalty and their Relationship in Grocery Markets Journal of Strategic Marketing 11 IssueID7 271–186 Occurrence Handle10.1080/0965254032000159072
N. Kong O. Salzmann U. Steger A. Lonescu-Somers (2002) ArticleTitleMoving Business/Industry Towards Sustainable Consumption: The Role of NGOs European Management Journal 20 IssueID2 109–127 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00022-1
Levitt, T.: 1983, 'The Globalization of Markets', Harvard Business Review, May–June, 121–131.
I. Maignan O. Ferrell (2004) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 32 IssueID1 3–19 Occurrence Handle10.1177/0092070303258971
S. Maklan S. D. Knox (2003) CSR at the Crossroads Published by Edelman London
D. McCutcheon J. Meredith (1993) ArticleTitleConducting Case Study Research in Operations Management Journal of Operations Management 11 IssueID3 85–97 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0272-6963(93)90002-7
A. Mitchell (2001) Right Side Up HarperCollins Business London
R. Mitchell B. Agle D. Wood (1997) ArticleTitleToward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts Academy of Management Review 22 IssueID4 853–886
R. Oliver (1997) Satisfaction McGraw-Hill Companies Inc New York
F. Reichheld (1996) The Loyalty Effect Harvard Business School Press Boston Mass
D. Remenyi B. Williams A. Money E. Swartz (1998) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method Sage Publications London
SIO: 2005, http://www.socialinvestment.ca?News&Archives/news-505-CSIR.htm.
M. Schwartz A. B. Carroll (2003) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Responsibility: A Three Domain Approach Business Ethics Quarterly 13 IssueID4 503–530
R. Thomke E. Von Hippel (2002) ArticleTitleCustomers as Innovators Harvard Business Review 80 IssueID4 74–85 Occurrence Handle12024760
S. A. Waddock S. B. Graves (1997) ArticleTitleThe Corporate Social Performance Financial Performance Link Strategic Management Journal 18 IssueID4 303–319 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.3.CO;2-7
M. Willmott (2001) Citizen Brands John Wiley & Sons Ltd Chichester
D. Wood (1991) ArticleTitleCorporate Social Performance Revisited Academy of Management Review 16 IssueID4 691–718
D. Windsor (2001) ArticleTitleThe Future of Corporate Social Responsibility The International Journal of Organisational Analysis 9 IssueID3 225–256
D. Wood R. Jones (1995) ArticleTitleStakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 IssueID3 229–267
Zadek, S.: 2002, 3rd Generation Corporate Citizenship http://www.accountability.org.uk/uploadstore/cms/docs/3rdGenCorpCitizenship.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knox, S., Maklan, S. & French, P. Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies. J Bus Ethics 61, 7–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4