Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution Born of Moisture: Analogies and Parallels Between Anaximander’s Ideas on Origin of Life and Man and Later Pre-Darwinian and Darwinian Evolutionary Concepts

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the origin of life as presented in the thought of Anaximander of Miletus but also points to some parallel motifs found in much later conceptions of both the pre-Darwinian German romantic science and post-Darwinian biology. According to Anaximander, life originated in the moisture associated with earth (mud). This moist environment hosted the first living creatures that later populated the dry land. In these descriptions, one can trace the earliest hints of the notion of environmental adaptation. The origin of humans was seen as connected in some way with fish: ancient humans were supposed to have developed inside fish-like animals. Anaximander took into account changes in the development of living creatures (adaptations) and speculated on the origins of humans. Similar ideas are found also in the writings of much later, eighteenth and nineteenth century authors who were close to the tradition of German romantic science. We do not argue that these later concepts are in any way directly linked with those of the pre-Socratics, but they show surprising parallels in, e.g., the hypothesis that life originated in a moist environment or the supposition that human developed from fish-like ancestors. These transformations are seen as a consequence of timeless logic rather than as evolution in historical terms. Despite the accent on the origin of living things, both Anaximander and the later Naturphilosophen lack in their notions the element most characteristic of Darwin’s thought, that is, the emphasis on historicity and uniqueness of all that comes into being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldry, Harold C. 1932. “Embryological Analogies in Presocratic Cosmogony.” Classical Quarterly 26: 27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Marcello. 2010. “On the Origin of Language. A Bridge Between Biolinguistics and Biosemiotics.” Biosemiotics 3: 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Jonathan. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Gordon. 2006. Strange Creatures: Anthropology in Antiquity. London: Gerald Duckworth & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, Frances M. 1932. Before and After Socrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, John W. 1865. “On the Structure of Certain Organic Remains in the Laurentian Limestones of Canada.” Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 21: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diels, Hermann and Kranz, Walther. (DK). 2004–2005. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. I.-II. Zurich: Weidmann.

  • Eastman, Charles R. 1905. “Anaximander, Earliest Precursor of Darwin.” Popular Science Monthly 67: 701–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, Michael T. 2005. “Homology as a Relation of Correspondence Between Parts of Individuals.” Theory in Biosciences 124: 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Daniel W. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presoratics. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Andrew. 2007. Ancient Greek Cosmogony. London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Andrew. 2009. “Anaximander’s Zoogony.” M. Rossetto, M. Tsianikas, G. Couvalis, M Palaktsoglou (eds.), Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial International Conference of Greek Studies, Flinders University June 2009. Adelaide: Flinders University Department of Languages – Modern Greek, pp. 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, William KC. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy. I. The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, William KC. 1965. A History of Greek Philosophy. II. The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, William KC.@ 1986. In the Beginning. Some Greek Views on the Origins of Life and the Early State of Man. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst. 1868. “Monographie der Moneren.” Jenaische Zeitschrift fur Medicin und Naturwissenschaft 4: 64–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, Ernst. 1877. “Bathybius und die Moneren.” Kosmos 1: 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Brian K. 1995. “Homology and Embryonic Development.” Evolutionary Biology 28: 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, Uwe, Olsson, Lennart. 2003. “The Road from Haeckel: The Jena Tradition in Evolutionary Morphology and the Origins of “Evo-Devo”.” Biology and Philosophy 18: 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Charles. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, Geoffrey S., Raven, John E. and Schofield, Malcolm. (KRS). 2011. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kleisner, Karel. 2007. “The Formation of the Theory of Homology in Biological Sciences.” Acta Biotheoretica 55: 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner, Karel. 2008a. “The Semantic Morphology of Adolf Portmann: A Starting Point for the Biosemiotics of Organic Form?” Biosemiotics 1: 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleisner, Karel. 2008b. “Homosemiosis, Mimicry, and Superficial Similarity: Notes on the Conceptualization of Independent Emergence of Similarity in Biology.” Theory in Biosciences 127: 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kočandrle, Radim. 2010a. Anaximandros z Mílétu [Anaximander of Miletus]. červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.

  • Kočandrle, Radim. 2010b. “Anaximandros z Mílétu a evoluce [Anaximander of Miletus and Evolution].” Filosofický časopis 4: 605–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvíl, Zdeněk. 2010. Mezi mořem a nebem. Odkaz iónské archaické vnímavosti [Between the Sea and the Heaven. Legacy of Archaic Ionian Sensibility]. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.

  • Laale, Hans W. 2007. Once They Were Brave, The Men of Miletus. Bloomington: Authorhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddel, Henry G. and Robert Scott. (LSJ). 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon, With a Revised Supplement: Jones, Henry S. and McKenzie, Roderick. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Lloyd, Geoffrey ER. 1964. “The Hot and the Cold, the Dry and the Wet in Greek Philosophy.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 84: 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loenen, Johannes. 1954. “Was Anaximander an Evolutionist?” Mnemosyne 7: 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naddaf, Gerard. 2005. The Greek Concept of Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, Adolf. 1941. “Die Tragzeiten der Primaten und die Dauer der Schwangerschaft beim Menschen: ein Problem der vergleichen Biologie.” Revue Suisse de Zoologie 48: 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portmann, Adolf. 1945. “Die Ontogenese des Menschen als Problem der Evolutionsforschung.” Verhandlungen der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 125: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rádl, Emanuel. 2006. Dějiny biologických teorií novověku [The History of Biological Theories]. I.-II. Prague: Academia.

  • Rehbock, Philip. 1975. “Huxley, Haeckel, and the Oceanographers: The Case of Bathybius haeckelii.” Isis 4: 504–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew. 2008. “Amoebae as Exemplary Cells: The Protean Nature of an Elementary Organism.” Journal of the History of Biology 41: 307–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Edward S. 1916. Form and function: a contribution to the history of animal morphology. London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spemann, Hans. 1915. “Zur Geschichte und Kritik des Begriffs der Homologie.” C Chun, W Johannsen (eds.), Die Kulturen der Gegenwart. Leipzig: Teubner, pp. 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radim Kočandrle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kočandrle, R., Kleisner, K. Evolution Born of Moisture: Analogies and Parallels Between Anaximander’s Ideas on Origin of Life and Man and Later Pre-Darwinian and Darwinian Evolutionary Concepts. J Hist Biol 46, 103–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9334-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-012-9334-8

Keywords

Navigation