Skip to main content
Log in

The Favorite-Longshot Bias in Sequential Parimutuel Betting with Non-Expected Utility Players

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes a model of sequential parimutuel betting described as a two-horse race with a finite number of noise bettors and a finite number of strategic and symmetrically informed bettors. For generic objective probabilities that the favorite wins the race, a unique subgame perfect equilibrium is characterized. Additionally, two explanations for the favorite–longshot bias—according to which favorites win more often than the market's estimate of their winning chances imply—are offered. It is shown that this robust anomalous empirical regularity might be due to the presence of transaction costs and/or to strategic bettors' subjective attitude to probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellaoui, M. (2002), A genuine rank-dependent generalization ofvon Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theorem, Econometrica 70(2), 717–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. (1977), Probability and utility estimates for racetrack bettors, Journal of Political Economy 85, 803–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busche, K. and Hall, C.D. (1988), An exception to the risk preference anomaly, Journal of Business 61, 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. and Zin, S.E. (1990), First-order risk aversion and the equity premium puzzle, Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 387–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, R. and King, S.P. (2001), Sequential parimutuel games, Economics Letters 72, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glosten, L. and Milgrom, P. (1985), Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders, Journal of Financial Economics 14(1), 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. and Wu, G. (1999), On the shape ofthe probability weighting function, Cognitive Psychology 38, 129–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, W. and McDonough, L. (1995), A note on the Hayek hypothesis and the favorite–longshot bias in parimutuel betting, American Economic Review 85(4), 949–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, W. and McDonough, L. (1996), The favourite-longshot bias in parimutuel betting: a clarification of the explanation that bettors like to bet longshots, Economics Letters 52, 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, B. and B. Salanié, (2000), Estimating preferences under risk: the case of racetrack bettors, Journal of Political Economy 108(3), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, A.S. (1985), Continuous auctions and insider trading, Econometrica 53(6), 1315–1336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R.B. (1991, Game Theory, Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press.

  • Preston, M. and Baratta, P. (1948), An experimental study ofthe auction-value of an uncertain outcome, American Journal of Psychology 61, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982), A theory ofanticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, R.D. (1998), The economics ofwagering markets, Journal of Economic Literature 36(4), 2021–2064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1990), Two-stage lotteries without the independence axiom, Econometrica 58, 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A. and Summers, L.H. (1990), The noise trader approach to finance, Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(2), 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, C. (2000), Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory ofchoice under risk, Journal of Economic Litterature 38, 332–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. and Ziemba, W.T. (1988), Anomalies: parimutuel betting markets: racetracks and lotteries, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan Williams, L. (1999), Information efficiency in betting markets: a survey, Bulletin of Economic Research 51(1), 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P. (1994), Separating marginal utility and risk aversion, Theory and Decision 36, 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T. (1997), A parimutuel system with two horses and a continuum of bettors, Journal of Mathematical Economics 28(1), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, T., Nonoyama, H. and Mori, M. (1994), A model ofa general parimutuel system: characterizations and equilibrium selection, International Journal of Game Theory 23(3), 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodland, L. and Woodland, B. (1994), Market efficiency and the favouritelongshot bias: The baseball betting market, Journal of Finance 49, 269–280.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koessler, F., Ziegelmeyer, A. & Broihanne, MH. The Favorite-Longshot Bias in Sequential Parimutuel Betting with Non-Expected Utility Players. Theory and Decision 54, 231–248 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027387507335

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027387507335

Navigation