Skip to main content
Log in

International Culture Collections and the Value of Microbial Life: Johanna Westerdijk’s Fungi and Ernst Georg Pringsheim’s Algae

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Around the turn of the twentieth century, microbiologists in Western Europe and North America began to organize centralized collections of microbial cultures. Collectors published lists of the strains they cultured, offering to send duplicates to colleagues near and far. This essay explores the history of microbial culture collections through two cases: Johanna Westerdijk’s collection of phytopathogenic fungi in the Netherlands and Ernst Georg Pringsheim’s collection of single-celled algae at the German University in Prague. Historians of science have tended to look at twentieth-century biological specimen collections as either repositories of communal research materials or storehouses of economically important biological variation. An examination of Westerdijk’s and Pringsheim’s collections illustrates how collectors, researchers, and patrons ascribed different kinds of value to collections featuring distinctive microbial life forms. This essay argues that characteristics of cultivated microorganisms, such as a fungus’s propensity to infect crops or an alga’s amenability to experimentation, shaped the trajectories of Westerdijk’s and Pringsheim’s collections as these collectors developed relationships with colleagues and patrons. Letters between Westerdijk and Pringsheim open a window onto divergences in their approaches to collecting cultures, while also shedding light on the aspirational internationality of the collections that resulted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Reproduced from F.A.F.C. Went. 1896. Notes on Sugar-cane Diseases. Annals of Botany 10: 583–600. Public domain

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Reproduced from E. G. Pringsheim. 1926. Kulturversuche mit chlorophyllführenden Mikroorganismen, V. Methoden und Erfahrungen. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 14: 283–312. Public domain

Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

n/a.

Code availability

n/a.

Notes

  1. Pringsheim to the Präsidium der internationalen Botanikergesellschaft (handwritten draft), 22 April 1935, Cod. Ms. 605, Nachlass Ernst Georg Pringsheim, Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen (hereafter EGP). All translations are my own, unless otherwise noted.

  2. Pringsheim to Westerdijk (handwritten draft), 22 April 1935, Cod. Ms. 605, EGP.

  3. Pringsheim to Westerdijk (handwritten draft), 22 April 1935, Cod. Ms. 605, EGP.

  4. Went to Westerdijk, 30 April 1912, Archives of the WCS. Cited and translated in Faasse (2008, p. 82).

  5. Faculteit Wis- en Natuurkunde to College van Curatoren, 7 February 1929, inv. 208, 1020, Gemeente-archief van Amsterdam. Cited and translated in Faasse (2008, p. 122).

  6. Utrechts Archief, item 59—College van Curatoren, Universiteit van Utrecht, inv. 2884 ‘Zuivering Westerdijk.’ Cited and translated in Faasse (2008, pp. 145–146).

  7. World Health Organization to Westerdijk, 27 June 1950, Archives of the WCS. Cited in Faasse (2008, p. 157).

  8. Fitting to Pringsheim, 12 December 1926, Cod. Ms. 143, EGP.

  9. Fitting to Pringsheim, 12 December 1926, Cod. Ms. 143, EGP.

  10. Staatsminister to Pringsheim, 18 March 1927, Folder 16481—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesarchiv Lichterfelde (hereafter BA).

  11. Report—“Die Tätigkeit der Prager Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Pflanzenernährung im Jahre 1929,” Folder 16481—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BA.

  12. Pringsheim to Notgemeinschaft der Deutschen Wissenschaft, 6 March 1930, Folder 16481—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BA.

  13. Pringsheim to Benecke, 10 August 1933, Cod. Ms. 33, EGP.

  14. Pringsheim to Notgemeinschaft der Deutschen Wissenschaft, January 1933, Folder 13726—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BA.

  15. Pringsheim to Notgemeinschaft der Deutschen Wissenschaft, 2 May 1935, Folder 13726—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BA.

  16. Pringsheim to Bold, 13 September 1941, Cod. Ms. 48, EGP.

  17. Mitteilung betr. Prof Pringsheim. Abschrift, 16 May 1935, Folder 13726—Pringsheim, Ernst Georg, R73—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, BA.

  18. Barber to Pringsheim, 11 June 1935, Cod. Ms. 18, EGP.

  19. Pringsheim to Barber, 24 June 1935, Cod. Ms. 18, EGP.

  20. Westerdijk to Pringsheim, 10 May 1935, Cod. Ms. 605, EGP.

  21. Pringsheim to Westerdijk, 28 July 1935, Cod. Ms. 605, EGP.

  22. Vischer to Pringsheim, 10 August 1935, Cod. Ms. 579, EGP.

  23. Vischer to the Mitglieder der Comités zur Weiterzüchtung von Algenkulturen, 27 September 1935, Cod. Ms. 579, EGP.

  24. Not immune from the pressures to acquire sufficient funding, the Lausanne collection apparently fizzled out of existence in the 1960s (Porter 1976, pp. 65–66).

References

  • Ackert, Lloyd. 2013. Sergei Vinogradskii and the Cycle of Life: From the Thermodynamics of Life to Ecological Microbiology, 1850–1950. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appel, Otto, and Johanna Westerdijk. 1919. Die Gruppierung der durch Pilze hervorgerufenen Pflanzenkrankheiten. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten 29: 176–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangham, Jenny. 2019. Living Collections: Care and Curation at Drosophila Stock Centres. BJHS Themes 4: 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/bjt.2019.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil, Christophe. 2019. Seeing Nature as a ‘Universal Store of Genes’: How Biological Diversity Became ‘Genetic Resources’, 1890–1940. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 75: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2018.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos, J. Ritzema. 1906. Het Phytopathologisch Laboratorium Willie Commelin Scholten van 1895 tot 1906. Tijdschrift over Plantenziekten 12: 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. Beyond ‘Identity.’ Theory and Society 29: 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Marlene. 2006. The Development of Penicillin in the Netherlands 1940–1950: The pivotal role of NV Nederlandsche Gist- en Spiritusfabriek, Delft. Ph.D., Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield.

  • Cittadino, Eugene. 1990. Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E., and Joan H. Fujimura, ed. 1992. The Right Tools for the Job: At Work in Twentieth-Century Life Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Ferdinand. 1872. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 1: 127–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Harold John. 2007. Matters of Exchange: Commerce, Medicine, and Science in the Dutch Golden Age. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Creager, Angela N. H. 2002. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Helen Anne. 2017a. Breeding Uniformity and Banking Diversity: The Genescapes of Industrial Agriculture, 1935–1970. Global Environment 10: 83–113. https://doi.org/10.3197/ge.2017.100104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Helen Anne. 2017b. From Working Collections to the World Germplasm Project: Agricultural Modernization and Genetic Conservation at the Rockefeller Foundation. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0131-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 1995. The Moral Economy of Science. Osiris 10: 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/368740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine. 2004. Type Specimens and Scientific Memory. Critical Inquiry 31: 153–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/427306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, John G., Jaromir Lukavský, Thomas Friedl, Jerry J. Brand, Christine N. Campbell, Maike Lorenz, and Josef Elster. 2004. Pringsheim’s Living Legacy: CCALA, CCAP, SAG and UTEX Culture Collections of Algae. Nova Hedwigia. https://doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2004/0079-0027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deichmann, Ute. 1992. Biologen unter Hitler: Vertreibung, Karrieren, Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elina, Olga, Susanne Heim, and Nils Roll-Hansen. 2005. Plant Breeding on the Front: Imperialism, War, and Exploitation. Osiris 20: 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1086/649417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erfgenaam von den heer Odo van Vloten. 1931. De Telegraaf, March 23, Ochtend edition.

  • Espahangizi, Kijan. 2015. From Topos to Oikos: The Standardization of Glass Containers as Epistemic Boundaries in Modern Laboratory Research (1850–1900). Science in Context 28: 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889715000137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faasse, Patricia. 2008. In Splendid Isolation: A History of the Willie Commelin Scholten Phytopathology Laboratory 1894–1992. Amsterdam: KNAW Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faasse, Patricia. 2012. Een Beetje Opstandigheid: Johanna Westerdijk. De Eerste Vrouwelijke Hoogleraar van Nederland. Amsterdam: Atlas Contact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, F. E., and A. G. Tansley. 1903. The Meeting of the ‘Association Internationale des Botanistes’ at Leiden. The New Phytologist 2: 76–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradmann, Christoph. 2001. Isolation, Contamination, and Pure Culture: Monomorphism and Polymorphism of Pathogenic Micro-Organisms as Research Problem 1860–1880. Perspectives on Science 9: 147–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhough, Beth. 2012. Where Species Meet and Mingle: Endemic Human-Virus Relations, Embodied Communication and More-Than-Human Agency at the Common Cold Unit 1946–90. Cultural Geographies 19: 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474011422029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Susanne. 2006. Expansion Policy and the Role of Agricultural Research in Nazi Germany. Minerva 44: 267–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-006-9007-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Adolph Frederik, Jan Willem Maurits La Rivière, and Wilhelmus Verhoeven, ed. 1959. Albert Jan Kluyver, His Life and Work: Biographical Memoranda, Selected Papers, Bibliography and Addenda. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1971. ‘Into Hostile Political Camps’: The Reorganization of International Science in World War I. Isis 62: 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, Jochen. 2003. Wissenschaftsförderung und forschungspolitische Prioritäten der Notgemeinschaft der Deutschen Wissenschaft 1920–1932. Dissertation, Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität.

  • Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, Robert E. 2006. All Creatures: Naturalists, Collectors, and Biodiversity, 1850–1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1983. Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World. In Science observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, ed. Karin Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, 141–169. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Ilana, and Jean Paul Gaudillière. 1998. The Invisible Industrialist: Manufactures and the Production of Scientific Knowledge. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maat, Harro. 2011. Science Cultivating Practice: A History of Agricultural Science in the Netherlands and its Colonies, 1863–1986. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcon, Federico. 2015. The Knowledge of Nature and the Nature of Knowledge in Early Modern Japan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. M. 1964. Conservation of Microorganisms. Annual Review of Microbiology 18: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.18.100164.000245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matta, Christina. 2007. The Science of Small Things: The Botanical Context of German Bacteriology, 1830–1910. Ph.D., Madison: University of Wisconsin.

  • Matta, Christina. 2010. Spontaneous Generation and Disease Causation: Anton de Bary’s Experiments with Phytophthora infestans and Late Blight of Potato. Journal of the History of Biology 43: 459–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9220-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumdar, Pauline M.H. 1995. Species and Specificity: An Interpretation of the History of Immunology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wille, Staffan. 1999. Botanik und weltweiter Handel: zur Begründung eines natürlichen Systems der Pflanzen durch Carl von Linné (1707–78). Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Wille, Staffan. 2017. Names and Numbers: “Data” in Classical Natural History, 1758–1859. Osiris 32, 109–128. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/693560.

  • Munz, Tania. 2016. The Dancing Bees: Karl von Frisch and the Discovery of the Honeybee Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neill, Deborah Joy. 2012. Networks in Tropical Medicine: Internationalism, Colonialism, and the Rise of a Medical Specialty, 1890–1930. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2017. The Organism Strikes Back: Chlorella Algae and Their Impact on Photosynthesis Research, 1920s–1960s. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39: 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-017-0137-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickelsen, Kärin. 2018. On Otto Warburg, Nazi Bureaucracy and the Difficulties of Moral Judgment. Photosynthetica 56: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-018-0773-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, Philip J. 1987. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres, Sara. 2016. Saving the Gene Pool for the Future: Seed Banks as Archives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 55: 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Personalnachrichten. 1907. Botanisches Centralblatt 28: 127–128.

  • Phytopathologisch laboratorium Willie Commelin Scholten. 1928. Het Vaderland, October 20, Avond edition, sec. C.

  • Porter, J. R. 1976. The World View of Culture Collections. In The Role of Culture Collections in the Era of Molecular Biology: ATCC 50. Anniversary Symposium, ed. Rita R. Colwell, 62–72. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1912. Kulturversuche mit chlorophyllführenden Mikroorganismen. I. Die Kultur von Algen in Agar. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 11: 305–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1915. Das Leben im Schlamm. Naturwissenschaften 3: 467–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01546920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1920. Die Algenkultur und ihre Aufgaben. Naturwissenschaftliche Umschau der Chemiker-Zeitung 9: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1921. Zur Physiologie von Polytoma uvella. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 38: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1926. Kulturversuche mit chlorophyllführenden Mikroorganismen, V. Methoden und Erfahrungen. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 14: 283–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1928a. Algenreinkulturen. Eine Liste der Stamme, welche auf Wunsch abgegeben wurden. Archiv für Protistenkunde 68: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1928b. Algenreinkulturen. Eine Liste der Stamme, welche auf Wunsch abgegeben wurden. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 46: 216–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1946. Pure Cultures of Algae: Their Preparation and Maintenance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringsheim, E. G. 1970. Eine autobiographische Skizze. Medizinhistorisches Journal 5: 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, Karen A. 2004. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Andrew. 2008. Amoebae as Exemplary Cells: The Protean Nature of an Elementary Organism. Journal of the History of Biology 41: 307–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Marsha L. 2015. Women as Mendelians and Geneticists. Science & Education 24: 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9666-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Felix. 1899. Ferdinand Cohn. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 17: 172–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1899.tb06239.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Corey. 2017. Ecology and Power in the Age of Empire: Europe and the Transformation of the Tropical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Samson, Robert A. 2004. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: Hundred Years Microbial Resource Centre. Studies in Mycology 50: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, Londa L. 2004. Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoevers, T. A. C, ed. 1923. Report of the International Conference of Phytopathology and Economic Entomology, Holland 1923. Wageningen: Committee of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, C.L., and B. O. Dodge. 1927. Life Histories and Heterothallism of the Red Bread-Mold Fungi of the Monilia sitophilia Group. Journal of Agricultural Research 34: 1019–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Pamela H., and Paula Findlen, ed. 2002. Merchants & Marvels: Commerce, Science and Art in Early Modern Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somsen, Geert J. 2008. A History of Universalism: Conceptions of the Internationality of Science from the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Minerva 46: 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-008-9105-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2019. Collecting Experiments: Making Big Data Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uekötter, Frank, ed. 2014. Comparing Apples, Oranges, and Cotton: Environmental Histories of the Global Plantation. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schoor, Wim. 1994. Biologie en Landbouw. F.A.F.C Went en de Indische Proefstations. Gewina 17: 145–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, J. H., and F. A. F. C. Went. 1898. De Ziekten van het Suikerriet op Java: Dl. I Ziekten, die niet door Dieren Veroorzaakt Worden. Leiden: Brill.

  • Went, F.A.F.C. 1896. Notes on Sugar-cane Diseases. Annals of Botany 10: 583–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Went, F.A.F.C. 1901a. Monilia sitophila (Mont.) Sacc., ein technischer Pilz Javas. Centralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde und Infektionskrankheiten. 2. Abt. 7: 544–550; 591–598.

  • Went, F.A.F.C. 1901b. Ueber den Einfluss der Nahrung auf die Enzymbildung durch Monilia Sitophila (Mont.) Sacc. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 36: 611–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werrett, Simon. 2019. Thrifty Science: Making the Most of Materials in the History of Experiment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1906. Zur Regeneration der Laubmoose. Recueil des Travaux Botaniques Néerlandais 3: 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1909a. Pure Cultures of Fungi. Botanical Gazette 47: 241–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1909b. Centralstelle für Pilzkulturen der Association internationale des Botanistes. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten 19: 425–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1915a. Phytopathology in the Tropics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2: 307–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2990038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1915b. Verslag van de Werkzaamheden van Mej. Dr. Joha. Westerdijk, Verricht in Nederlandsch Oost-Indië, naar Aanleiding van het Buitenzorgfonds. Nederlandsche Staatscourant, February 13, sec. Bijvoegsel.

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1917. De Nieuwe Wegen van het Phytopathologisch Onderzoek. Rede Uitgesproken bij het Aanvaarden van het Ambt van Buitengewoon Hoogleeraar aan de Universiteit te Utrecht, op Zaterdag 10 febr. Amsterdam: J. H. de Bussy.

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1924. The Central Bureau for Fungous Cultures. In Report of the International Conference on Phytopathology and Economic Entomology, ed. T. A. C. Schoevers, 165–169. Wageningen: H. Veenman & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1947. On the Cultivation of Fungi in Pure Culture. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 12: 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02272669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerdijk, Johanna. 1950. Dr. A. van Luyk (1874–1950). Vakblad voor Biologen 30: 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, Edwards, Johanna Westerdijk, O. Appel, N. Wille, Henry King, William G. Farlow, Charles Nagel, and George T. Moore. 1915. The Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Celebration. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2990026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willink, Bastiaan. 1991. Origins of the Second Golden Age of Dutch Science after 1860: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Educational Reform. Social Studies of Science 21: 503–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631291021003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woudsma, Jacobus. 1990. The Royal Tropical Institute: An Amsterdam Landmark. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zallen, Doris T. 1993. The ‘Light’ Organism for the Job: Green Algae and Photosynthesis Research. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Brad Bolman, Angela Creager, Tara Suri, Patricia Faase, Jacalyn Duffin, Jocelyn Holland, Jonathan Koch, members of the HSS works-in-progress group at Caltech, two anonymous reviewers, and the editors of this journal for invaluable comments on previous drafts of this paper. I express my gratitude to Maike Lorenz, curator of the Culture Collection of Algae at Göttingen University, and Lesley Robertson, curator of the Delft School of Microbiology Archive, for assistance locating primary sources and images.

Funding

Research supported by a Mellon/American Council of Learned Societies Dissertation Completion Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles A. Kollmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

n/a.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kollmer, C.A. International Culture Collections and the Value of Microbial Life: Johanna Westerdijk’s Fungi and Ernst Georg Pringsheim’s Algae. J Hist Biol 55, 59–87 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09669-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09669-6

Keywords

Navigation