Abstract
This article reflects on the assumption underlying the argument of Little et al. that "contested understandings" in the clinic are susceptible to reconciliation within a liberal framework described as "pragmatic pluralism". It is argued that no such reconciliation is possible or desirable because it is of the nature of the clinic that it provides a forum for multiple voices, ethical and cultural perspectives, and conceptual frameworks, and this is the source of its fecundity and creativity. Medicine itself cannot be represented by a single discourse, precisely because it is itself an unruly collection of practices that, despite their heterogeneity, are able to engage in productive dialogues with each other. The heteroglossia of the clinic, therefore, is not a problem to be overcome. Rather, it is a rich resource to be mobilized in accordance with its multiple inherent purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M.M. Michael Holquist (ed.). 1981. Discourse in the novel. In The dialogic imagination: Four essays, 259-422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bauman, Z. 1995. The stranger revisited—and revisiting. In Life in fragments: Essays in postmodern morality, 126-138. Oxford: Blackwell.
Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Horkheimer, M., and T.W. Adorno. 2002. Dialectic of enlightenment. Stanford University Press.
Komesaroff, P.A. 2014. Experiments in love and death. Melbourne University Press.
Komesaroff, P.A., E. Kath, and P. James. 2011. Reconciliation and the technics of healing. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8(3): 2-4.
Little, M., C.F.C. Jordens, C. McGrath, K. Montgomery, I. Kerridge, and S.M. Carter. 2007. “Pragmatic pluralism” mutual tolerance of contested understandings between orthodox and alternative practitioners in autologous stem cell transplantation. Social Science and Medicine 64: 1512-1523.
Thomas, S., K. Lam, and P.A. Komesaroff. 2007. Complementary medicine use among people living with HIV/AIDS in Victoria, Australia: Practices, attitudes and perceptions. International Journal of STD & AIDS 18(7): 453-457.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Komesaroff, P.A. Response—The Multiple Understandings in the Clinic Do Not Always Need to be Resolved. Bioethical Inquiry 19, 97–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10143-x