Skip to main content
Log in

Aristotle on habit and moral character formation

  • Published:
International Journal of Ethics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The habitual action is not only undertaken on a regular basis but also is personalized which has moral significance when we evaluate action and personality. For Aristotle, inculcating virtues through habitual action could develop a moral character. The naturalistic or behaviouristic perspective and the non-naturalistic perspective are two ways to interpret this Aristotelian theoretical position. The naturalistic thesis maintains that habit and character formation is inherently present in the form of disposition in human beings and could be causally related to the neurophysiological function of the brain process. On the other hand, the non-naturalistic thesis upholds a teleological account of the formation of moral character which is grounded in the power of will. This paper, which delves into Aristotle’s notion of habit and its role in the formation of moral character, examines these two theoretical perspectives in order to substantiate the relationship between habits and moral character formation. It also analyses the logical relationship between habits and moral character to show how the moral character is developed by strengthening the power of will.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Aristotle mentioned in Nicomachean Ethics, Book II, (1103b20) that none of the moral virtues arises in us by nature; for nothing that exists by nature can form a habit contrary to its nature, that is in his words, “Neither by nature, then, nor contrary to nature do the virtues arise in us; rather we are adapted by nature to receive them and are made perfect by habit”. See, Aristotle, 1999a, b.

  2. See, the Archive Article, 2015. “Difference between Habit and Instinct”, N.D. Retrieved January 1, 2015 fromhttp://www.differencebetween.info/difference-between-habit-and-instinct.

  3. See, the quote of John Dryden (fifteenth century English poet, literary critics) which is published in http://www.healingphilosophy.com, Archive Healing Philosophy: Harness your inner strength, 2008.

References

  • Annas, Julia. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1999a. Nicomachean Ethics, translated by W.D. Ross. Kitchener: Batoche Book.

  • Aristotle. 1999b. Politics, translated by Benjamin Jowett. Kitchener: Batoche Book.

  • Aristotle. 2009. The Nichomachen Ethics, translated by David Ross and Edited by Lesley Brown. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/covers/pop-up/9780199213610, https://philosophylnu.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/aristotle-nicomachean-ethicsoxford-2009.pdf

  • Bernacer, Javier, and Jose Ignacio Murillo. 2014. The Aristotelian conception of habit and its contribution to human neuroscience. Frontier in Human Neuroscience 883 (8): 874–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, Sarah. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle. NewYork. Oxford University Press.

  • Cosmides, Leda, and John Tooby. 1997. Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. Center for Evolutionary Psychology, retrieve from https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html . [Accessd 13 January 1997]: 1–33.

  • Dunlap, Knight. 1922. The identity of instinct and habit. The Journal of Philosophy 19 (4): 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Mark, Michael Ashby, et al. 1948. Oxford advanced Learner’s dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Daina Mertz. 2002. The Habits of Aristotle. Aristotle (Phil 5081, Robinson), retrieve from http://www.philosophyinaction.com/docs/thoa.pdf, [Accessed 13 December 2002]: 1–7.

  • Jog, Mandar, Yasuo Kubota, Christopher Connolly, et al. 1995. Building neural representation of habits. Science 5445 (286): 1745–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, Jeanette, and Philip Gerrans. 2010. Neurosentimentalism and moral agency. Mind 475 (119): 584–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malikail, Joseph. 2003. Moral character: Hexis, habitus and habit. An Internet Journal of Philosophy 3 (1): 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, David T., Wendy Wood, and Jeffrey M. Quinn. 2006. Habits – A repeat performance. The Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (4): 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, Bill. 2006. Explaining actions with habits. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Robert C. 1998. Will power and the virtues. The Philosophical Review 93 (2): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Nancy. 2014. The fabric of character. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, Tom, and Adam Hutchinson. 2013. A history of habit: from Aristotle to Bourdieu. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmson, J.O. 1988. Aristotle’s ethics. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigations, translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manik Konch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Konch, M., Panda, R.K. Aristotle on habit and moral character formation. International Journal of Ethics Education 4, 31–41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-018-0061-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-018-0061-7

Keywords

Navigation