-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Angelika Kratzer, Constraining Premise Sets for Counterfactuals, Journal of Semantics, Volume 22, Issue 2, May 2005, Pages 153–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh020
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
This note is a reply to ‘On the Lumping Semantics of Counterfactuals’ by Makoto Kanazawa, Stefan Kaufmann and Stanley Peters. It shows first that the first triviality result obtained by Kanazawa, Kaufmann, and Peters is already ruled out by the constraints on admissible premise sets listed in Kratzer (1989). Second, and more importantly, it points out that the results obtained by Kanazawa, Kaufmann, and Peters are obsolete in view of the revised analysis of counterfactuals in Kratzer (1990, 2002).
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
Issue Section:
Articles
You do not currently have access to this article.