Abstract
Editing human germline genes may act as boon in some genetic and other disorders. Recent editing of the genome of the human embryo with the CRISPR/Cas9 editing tool generated a debate amongst top scientists of the world for the ethical considerations regarding its effect on the future generations. It needs to be seen as to what transformation human gene editing brings to humankind in the times to come.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Aly, G. (1994). Cleansing the fatherland: Nazi medicine and racial hygiene. Batimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Berg, P., Baltimore, D., Brenner, S., Roblin, R. O., & Singer, M. F. (1975). Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72(6), 1981–1984.
Berger, R. L. (1990). Nazi science—The Dachau hypothermia experiments. The New England Journal of Medicine, 20(322), 1435–1440. doi:10.1056/NEJM199005173222006.
Bjorkman, M., & Widmalm, S. (2010). Selling eugenics: The case of Sweden. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, London, 64(4), 379–400. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2010.0009.
Butler, D. (1997). Eugenics scandal reveals silence of Swedish scientists. Nature, 389(6646), 9. doi:10.1038/37848.
Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C., Boyer, H. W., & Helling, R. B. (1973). Construction of biologically functional bacterial plasmids in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 70(11), 3240–3244.
Cyranoski, D., & Reardon, S. (2015). Chinese scientists genetically modify human embryos, Nature News, 22 April 2015. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17378. Available at http://www.nature.com/news/chinese-scientists-genetically-modify-human-embryos-1.17378.
Galton, F. (1883). Inquires into human faculty and its development (p. 199). London: Macmillan publications.
Lanphier, E., Urnov, F., Haecker, S. E., Werner, M., Smolenski, J. (2015). Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature, 519(7544), 410–411. doi:10.1038/519410a. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/don-t-edit-the-human-germ-line-1.17111.
Liang, P., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, C., Huang, R., et al. (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein and Cell, 6(5), 363–372. doi:10.1007/s13238-015-0153-5.
Micklos, D., & Carlson, E. (2000). Engineering American society: The lesson of eugenics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 1(2), 153–158.
Otsubo, S., & Bartholomew, J. R. (1998). Eugenics in Japan: Some ironies of odernity, 1883–1945. Science in Context, 11(3–4), 545–565. doi:10.1038/35084588.
Reardon, S. (2015). US science academies take on human-genome editing. Nature News, 18 May 2015. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17581. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/us-science-academies-take-on-human-genome-editing-1.17581.
Sharma, A., & Scott, C. T. (2015). The ethics of publishing human germline research. Nature Biotechnology, 33(6), 590–592. doi:10.1038/nbt.3252.
Spice of Life (Editorial). (2015). Nature, 521(7550), 5. May 7, 2015. doi:10.1038/521005a. Available at http://www.nature.com/news/splice-of-life-1.17476.
Vogel, G. (2015). Bioethics. Embryo engineering alarm. Science, 347(6228), 1301. doi:10.1126/science.347.6228.1301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest statement regarding this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishan, K., Kanchan, T. & Singh, B. Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 597–599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9675-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9675-8