Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:52:27.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sandra Harding Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2008.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Kristen Intemann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2010 , pp. 464 - 469
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Book Reviews

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2004. Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce. Hypatia 19 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1997. The reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World risk society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Michael, Camille, Limoges, Helga, Nowotny, Simon, Schwartzman, Peter, Scott, and Trow, Martin. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 2004. A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory's controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Hugh. 1991. Understanding conflicts between north and south. In Cultural relativism and philosophy: North and Latin American perspectives, ed. Dascal, M.Leiden: E. J. Brill, pp. 243–262.Google Scholar
Lacey, Hugh. 1999. Is science value free? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga, Peter, Scott, and Gibbons, Michael. 2001. Re‐thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 2004. Plants and empire: Colonial bioprospecting in the Atlantic world. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Catherine V. 1995. Gender and development: Rethinking modernization and dependency theory. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1989. Staying alive: Women, ecology, and development. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison, and Nelson, Lynn Hankinson. 2007. Coming to terms with the values of science: Insights from feminist science studies scholarship. In Value‐free science? Ideals and illusions, ed. Kincaid, H., Dupré, J., and Wylie, A.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar