Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-Directedness and the Question of Autonomy: From Counterfeit Education to Critical and Transformative Adult Learning

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to introduce a correction into the notion of self-directed adult learning by way of conjoining it with philosophically elaborated notions of autonomy, self-reflectiveness, and maturity. The basic premise of this intervention is that in andragogical theorizing, learners’ self-directedness ought not to be thought as obvious and thus beyond question. Since adult selves are not transparent but socially, culturally, and discoursively constructed, adult educators are encouraged to think of themselves as facilitators of adult learners’ self-awareness and self-directedness in their learning processes. Adult learners need to be assisted in developing critical skills that can be used to eliminate distortions in their perception of social reality, in understanding their own personalities, their needs and decisions concerning continuing education. The problematization of the concept of human autonomy amid external influences, is first discussed in Immanuel Kant’s idea of maturity as an ability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. I then turn to Habermas’s philosophy of communicative action and three knowledge-constitutive interests where the human interest in emancipation comes to the fore. Its significance for critical adult learning is further emphasized in line with Stephen Brookfield’s and Jack Mezirow’s association of self-directed learning with empowerment, understood as freeing consciousness from its dependence on hypostatized powers. Drawing on Foucault’s work, I argue that attaining the state of autonomy requires practice in “the care for oneself” which amounts to the lifelong endeavor to create and govern oneself and to learn how not to be governed. The agenda for adult education for citizenship opted for in this paper attributes essential significance to learnable skills of critical reasoning, deliberation, and self-reflectiveness which all operate within three proposed dimensions of adult education: experiential learning, literacy, and vocationalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Habermas is using the term Mündigkeit which in the English translation of his book Erkentniss und Interesse (Knowledge and Human Interests, 1972) was incorrectly rendered as “responsibility”. I am here revising this translation in order to retain the reference of Kantian Mündigkeit to English “maturity” and thus to enlightenment, defined by Kant as “man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity (Unmündigkeit)” (Kant 1970: 54).

References

  • Bin Abdullah, M.M., et al. 2008. Adult Participation in Self-Directed Learning Programs. International Education Studies 1(3): 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brameld, Th. 2000 (1965). Education as Power. San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press.

  • Brookfield, S. 1986. Understanding and Facilitating Adult Learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. 2010. Learning Democratic Reason: The Adult Education Project of Jürgen Habermas. In Habermas, Critical Theory and Education, ed. M. Murphy and T. Fleming, 125–136. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. 2013. Powerful Techniques for Teaching Adults. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P. 1987. Evolution, Revolution or Devolution: Increasing Learner Control in the Instructional Setting. In Appreciating Adults Learning: From the Learner’s Perspective, ed. D. Boud and V. Griffin, 159–178. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danis C., Tramblay N. 1985. Critical Analysis of Adult-Learning Principles from A Self- Directed Learner’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Adult Education Research Conference, Vol. 26, pp. 138–143. Tempe: Arizona State University Press.

  • Dewey, J. 2001. Democracy and Education. Hazelton: A Penn State Electronic Classics Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure, E., et al. 1972. Learning to Be: The World of Education Today and Tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1984a. Who Is the Author? In The Essential Works of Foucault 19541984 (transl. R. Hurley et al.), vol. 2, ed. P. Rabinow, 205–222. New York: The New Press.

  • Foucault, M. 1984b. Le Souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1990. Qu-est-ce-que la critique? Bulletin de la Société Française de la Philosophie LXXXIV: 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A., and S. Aronowitz. 1987. Education Under Siege: The Conservative, Liberal, and Radical Debate over Schooling. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 1997. Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.A. 2005. Schooling and the Struggle for Public Life: Democracy’s Promise and Education’s Challenge. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. 2006. America on the Edge: Henry Giroux on Politics, Culture, and Education. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1972. Knowledge and Human Interests (transl. J. J. Shapiro). Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Habermas, J. 1974. Theorie und Praxis. Sozialphilosophische Studien. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society (transl. T. McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Habermas, J. 1994. The Past as Future (transl. W. Privitera). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Hammond, M., and R. Collins. 1991. Self-Directed Learning: Critical Practice. London: Cogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M.U. 1992. Working and Educating for Life: Feminist and International Perspectives on Adult Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joldersma, C.J., and R. Deakin Crick. 2010. Citizenship, Discourse Ethics and an Emancipatory Model of Lifelong Learning. In Habermas, Critical Theory and Education, ed. M. Murphy and T. Fleming, 137–152. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, Ch. 1987. The Crisis of the Welfare State, Collective Consumption, And the Rise of New Social Actors. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 237–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1970. An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. In Kant’s Political Writings (transl. H. B. Nisbet), ed. H.S. Reiss, 54–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Knowles, M. 1975. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Cambridge Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M.S. 1980. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovat, T. 2013. Jürgen Habermas: Education’s Reluctant Hero. In Social Theory and Education Research: Understanding Foucault, Habermas, Bourdieu, and Derrida, ed. M. Murphy, 69–83. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, T. 1978. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge: The Massachussets Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. 1995. Critical Pedagogy and Predatory Culture: Oppositional Politics in a Postmodern Era. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 1981. A Critical Theory of Adult Learning and Education. Adult Education 32: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 1985. A Critical Theory of Self-Directed Learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 25: 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 2000a. Learning as Transformation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. 2000b. Learning to Think Like an Adult. In Learning as Transformation: Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress, ed. J. Mezirow et al., 7–8. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., and T. Fleming. 2000. Between Common and College Knowledge: Exploring the Boundaries Between Adult and Higher Education. Studies in Continuing Education 22(1): 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. 1959. A Theory of Therapy, Personality and Interpersonal Relationships, as Developed in the Client-Centered Framework. In Psychology: A Study of Science, ed. S. Koch, 184–256. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. 1977. Carl Rogers on Personal Power. New York: Delacorte Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1994. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M., and J. Masschelein. 2008. Our ‘Will to Learn’ and the Assemblage of the Learning Apparatus. In Foucault and Lifelong Learning: Governing the Subject, ed. A. Fejes and K. Nicoll, 48–60. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, C.A. 2013. Political Sociology of Adult Learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tough, A.M. 1967. Learning Without a Teacher: A Study of Tasks and Assistance During Adult Self-Teaching Projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, 2010. CONFINTEA VI, Sixth International Conference on Adult Education: Final Report. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

  • Usher, R., I. Bryant, and R. Johnston. 1997. Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge Learning Beyond the Limits. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wieringen, F., and G. Attwell. 1999. Vocational and Adult Education in Europe, 1–17. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welton, M. 1991. Shaking off the Foundations: The Critical Turn in Adult Education Theory. The Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education 5: 20–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Kruszelnicki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kruszelnicki, W. Self-Directedness and the Question of Autonomy: From Counterfeit Education to Critical and Transformative Adult Learning. Stud Philos Educ 39, 187–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09697-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09697-6

Keywords

Navigation