Opinion
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.001Get rights and content

Although Bayesian models of mind have attracted great interest from cognitive scientists, Bayesian methods for data analysis have not. This article reviews several advantages of Bayesian data analysis over traditional null-hypothesis significance testing. Bayesian methods provide tremendous flexibility for data analytic models and yield rich information about parameters that can be used cumulatively across progressive experiments. Because Bayesian statistical methods can be applied to any data, regardless of the type of cognitive model (Bayesian or otherwise) that motivated the data collection, Bayesian methods for data analysis will continue to be appropriate even if Bayesian models of mind lose their appeal.

Section snippets

Cognitive science should be Bayesian even if cognitive scientists are not

An entire issue of Trends in Cognitive Sciences was devoted to the topic of Bayesian models of cognition [1] and there has been a surge of interest in Bayesian models of perception, learning and reasoning 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. The essential premise of the Bayesian approach is that the rational, normative way to adjust knowledge when new data are observed is to apply Bayes’ rule (i.e. the mathematically correct formula) to whatever representational structures are available to the reasoner. The promise

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST)

In NHST, after collecting data, a researcher computes the value of a summary statistic such as t or F or χ2, and then determines the probability that so extreme a value could have been obtained by chance alone from a population with no effect if the experiment were repeated many times. If the probability of obtaining the observed value is small (e.g. p < 0.05), then the null hypothesis is rejected and the result is deemed significant.

Bayesian data analysis

In Bayesian data analysis, the researcher uses a descriptive model that is easily customizable to the specific situation without the computational restrictions in conventional NHST models. Before considering any newly collected data, the analyst specifies the current uncertainty for parameter values, called a prior distribution, that is acceptable to a skeptical scientific audience. Then Bayesian inference yields a complete posterior distribution over the conjoint parameter space, which

Models of cognition and models of data

The posterior distribution of a Bayesian analysis only tells us which parameter values are relatively more or less credible within the realm of models that the analyst cares to consider. Bayesian analysis does not tell us what models to consider in the first place. For typical data analysis, descriptive models are established by convention: most empirical researchers are familiar with cases of the generalized linear model 30, 31 such as linear regression, logistic regression and ANOVA. Given

Glossary

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
when metric data (e.g. response times) are measured in each of several groups, traditional ANOVA decomposes the variance among all data into two parts: the variance between group means and the variance among data within groups. The underlying descriptive model can be used in Bayesian data analysis.
Bayes’ rule
a simple mathematical relationship between conditional probabilities that relates the posterior probability of parameter values, on the one hand, to the

References (46)

  • M.D. Lee et al.

    Bayesian statistical inference in psychology: comment on Trafimow (2003)

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2005)
  • E.J. Wagenmakers

    A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values

    Psychon. Bull. Rev.

    (2007)
  • Kruschke, J.K. (2010) Bayesian data analysis. Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Cogn. Sci. DOI:...
  • J.O. Berger et al.

    Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity

    Am. Sci.

    (1988)
  • D.V. Lindley et al.

    Inference for a Bernoulli process (a Bayesian view)

    Am. Stat.

    (1976)
  • Maxwell, S.E. and Delaney, H.D. (2004) Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective (2nd...
  • J. Miller

    What is the probability of replicating a statistically significant effect?

    Psychon. Bull. Rev.

    (2009)
  • M.D. Lee

    Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models

    Psychon. Bull. Rev.

    (2008)
  • W. Vanpaemel

    BayesGCM: software for Bayesian inference with the generalized context model

    Behav. Res. Methods

    (2009)
  • M.D. Lee

    BayesSDT: software for Bayesian inference with signal detection theory

    Behav. Res. Methods

    (2008)
  • J.N. Rouder

    A hierarchical process-dissociation model

    J. Exp. Psychol.

    (2008)
  • M.D. Lee et al.

    A model of knower-level behavior in number concept development

    Cogn. Sci.

    (2010)
  • J.K. Kruschke

    Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS

    (2010)
  • Cited by (239)

    • The Value of Bayesian Methods for Accurate and Efficient Neuropsychological Assessment

      2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text