Rural Women Redefining Care and Agency in the Argentine Pampas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v17i2.3404Keywords:
care, rural, women, ArgentinaAbstract
This article provides an ethnographic analysis of the agency of women who reside in the rural areas of the Argentine Pampas, based on their promotion and production of agroecological family horticulture. The recognition of these women’s agency through care – care of their children, global care, and green care – offers a significant challenge to some metrocentric and Eurocentric feminist perspectives that claim care work can only be oppressive for women. The first of these types of care empowers women to improve the nutrition of their children. It also relates to another underlying type of care, which is to provide a sufficiently robust education as to ensure their children have a better and alternative future. The second type of care has the power to socially transform the territorial space of the district’s countryside and its marginalized populations which, through care, acquire greater public and political attention. The third type of care empowers women to transform and care for the environment, and is exercised by not using pesticides in horticultural production and by disseminating knowledge on the matter. In line with discussions of postcolonial feminism (Abu-Lughod, 1986; Mahmood, 2001; Suárez Navaz, 2008), I argue that certain properties that are attributed to women relative to caregiving – by way of a dichotomous view of gender relations – fuel their agency: for these women the cultivation of vegetables is a form of agency that actively combats food, training and labor inequality.
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (1986). Veiled sentiments: Honor and poetry in a bedouin society. University of California Press.
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17 (1), 41-55.
Albaladejo, C. (2013). Dinámica de la inserción territorial de la agricultura pampeana y emergencia del agribusiness. In C. Gras & V. Hernández (Eds.), El agro como negocio: Producción, sociedad y territorios en la globalización (pp. 67-96). Editorial Biblos.
Barrancos, D. (2008). Mujeres, entre la casa y la plaza. Sudamericana.
Di Marco, G. (2010). El poder de lo colectivo. Los discursos de derechos y la transformación de las identidades feministas en la Argentina post-crisis. Iberoamericana, 10 (40), 199-204.
FAO. (2004). Fertilizer use by crop in Argentina. FAO. https://www.fao.org/3/y5210e/y5210e.pdf
Federici, S. (2018). El patriarcado del salario: Críticas feministas al marxismo. Traficante de Sueños.
Felitti, K. (2014). L’avortement en Argentine. Politique, religion et droits humains. Autrepart. Revue du Sciences Sociales du Sud, 70 (2), 73-90.
Folbre, N. (2006). Measuring care: Gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 183-199.
Gago, V. (2017). Política del deseo. Entrevista a Raquel Gutiérrez Aguilar. Lobo Suelto. http://lobosuelto.com/politica-del-deseo-entrevista-a-raquel-gutierrez-aguilar-veronica-gago.
Gago, V. (2018). Critical times/La tierra tiembla. Critical Times: Interventions in Global Critical Theory, 1 (1), 178-197.
Giarracca, N., & Teubal, M. (2006). Democracia y neoliberalismo en el campo argentino. Una convivencia difícil. In H. Grammont (Ed.), La construcción de la democracia en el campo latinoamericano (pp. 69-94). CLACSO.
Giddens, A (1976). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. John Wiley & Sons.
Grimson, A. (2011). Los límites de la cultura: crítica de las teorías de la identidad. Siglo Veintiuno.
Gutmann, M. (2012). Beyond resistance: Raising utopias from the dead in Mexico City and Oaxaca. In J. Gledhill & P. Schell (Eds.), New approaches to resistance in Brazil (pp. 305-324). Duke University Press.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos de Argentina. (2010). Censo Nacional.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In J. Clarke, A. Hanson, R. Harrison & F. Reeve (Eds.), Supporting lifelong learning (pp. 121-136). Routledge.
Kunin, J. (2019). El poder del cuidado: Mujeres y agencia en la pampa sojera argentina/Le pouvoir du Care: L’agentivité des femmes dans la pampa argentine au temps du soja OGM. Tesis de Doctorado en cotutela presentada a la École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS, Francia) y al Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales (IDAES), Universidad Nacional de San Martín (Argentina).
Kunin, J., & Lucero, P. A. (2020). Percepción social del riesgo y dinámicas de género en la producción agrícola basada en plaguicidas en la pampa húmeda Argentina. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro), 35, 58-81.
Masson, L (2007). Feministas en todas partes: Una etnografía de espacios y narrativas feministas en Argentina. Prometeo Libros.
Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian islamic revival. Cultural anthropology, 16 (2), 202-236.
Mies, M., & Shiva, V. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
Molinier, P. (2013). Le travail du care. La dispute.
Nari, M. (2004). Políticas de maternidad y maternalismo político: Buenos Aires, 1890-1940. Editorial Biblos.
Navarro, M., & Linsalata, L. (2014). Crisis y reproducción social: Claves para repensar lo común. Entrevista a Silvia Federici realizada junto con Lucía Linsalata. Revista OSAL, (35), 15-26.
Ortner, S (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37 (1), 173-193.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge.
Rosales, M. B. (2016). #Niunamenos y los debates fundantes en comunicación y género. Con X, (2). https://perio.unlp.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/conequis/article/view/CXe10
Sahlins, M. (2002). Waiting for foucault, still. Prickly Paradigm Press.
Scott, J. (1987). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.
Segato, R. (2016). La guerra contra las mujeres. Traficantes de sueños.
Sewell Jr., W. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1), 1-29.
Suárez Navaz, L. (2008). Colonialismo, gobernabilidad y feminismos poscoloniales. In L. Suárez Navaz & R. Hernández Castillo (Eds.), Descolonizando el feminismo: Teorías y prácticas desde los márgenes (pp. 31-74). Cátedra.
Tarducci, M., & D. Rifkin, D. (2010). Fragmentos de historia del feminismo en Argentina. In S. Chaher & S. Santoro (Eds.), Las palabras tienen sexo II: Herramientas para un periodismo de género (17-39). Comunicación Ediciones.
Trebisacce, C. (2013). Memorias del feminismo de la ciudad de Buenos Aires en la primera mitad de la década del setenta. Tesis presentada con el fin de cumplimentar con los requisitos finales para la obtención del título Doctor en Antropología. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.
Tronto, J. (1993) Moral boundaries. A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Ulloa, A. (2016). Cuidado y defensa de los territorios-naturalezas: Mujeres indígenas y soberanía alimentaria en Colombia. Sustentabilidad desde abajo: Luchas desde el género y la etnicidad. Lateinamerika-Institut der Freien Universität Berlin.
Vázquez Laba, V., & Masson, L. (2019). Que pensamos sobre la agenda feminista. Anfibia.
Zelizer, V. (2009). La negociación de la intimidad. FCE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Johana Kunin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
