Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fulfilling consumer expectations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) can bring strategic advantage to firms. However, research on the topic is fragmented across disparate disciplines, and a comprehensive framework to connect CSR supply and demand is missing. As a result, firms often supply CSR that does not attract demand, as signified by pessimism about ethical consumerism in recent years and the inconclusive link between corporate financial and social performance. In this study, we propose a framework of strategic CSR management to define how a company’s supply of CSR could meet consumer demand for ethical products by aligning managerial and consumer perspectives. We then investigate empirically whether such a strategic approach, which integrates potential demand in CSR management, would influence consumer choice of products with CSR components. Our hybrid choice modeling allows the inclusion of psychological biases caused by social desirability and cynicism to increase result validity. The findings support the explanatory power of the framework and reveal that consumers prefer some CSR elements while others adversely affect choices. This study advances the understanding of strategic CSR management and its impact on consumer choice and helps managers include the right mix of CSR characteristics in their products to satisfy ethical consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Zeid, M., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2014). Hybrid choice models. In S. Hess & A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Choice Modelling (pp. 383–412). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M. S. (2007). An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy. Sustainability Science, 2(1), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Frankle, A. W. (1980). Voluntary social reporting: An iso-beta portfolio analysis. The Accounting Review, 55(3), 467–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L. (2019). The business case for corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 58(1), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. (2009). A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, S. C. (2007). Consumers and corporate social responsibility: Matching the unmatchable? Australasian Marketing Journal, 15(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire, M. (2016a). Estimating Choice Models with Latent Variables with PythonBiogeme (Series on BIOGEME No. TRANSP-OR 160628). Lausanne.

  • Bierlaire, M. (2016b). PythonBiogeme: A Short Introduction (Series on Biogeme No. TRANSP-OR 160706). Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Brown, T., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61(January), 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(3), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Strategic Perspective. New York: Business Expert Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatzidakis, A., Kastanakis, M., & Stathopoulou, A. (2016). Socio-Cognitive determinants of consumers’ support for the Fair Trade movement. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., & Ng, A. (2011). Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability and price effects on consumer responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chylinski, M., & Chu, A. (2010). Consumer cynicism: antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Marketing, 44(6), 796–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, J., & Shaw, D. (2006). Identifying fair trade in consumption choice. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, S., Anderson-MacDonald, S., & Thomson, M. (2017). Overcoming the ‘window dressing’ effect: Mitigating the negative effects of inherent skepticism towards corporate social responsibility.’. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 599–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A. (2008). Meeting the ethical gaze: Challenges for orienting to the ethical market. In R. Harrison, T. Newholm & D. Shaw (Eds.), The Ethical Consumer (pp. 219–232). London: SAGE

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., & Xu, Y. (2017). Consumers’ responses to corporate social responsibility initiatives: The mediating role of consumer–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(3), 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M., Auger, P., Eckhardt, G., & Birtchnell, T. (2006). The other CSR: Consumer Social Responsibility. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 61(2), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diallo, M. F., & Lambey-Checchin, C. (2017). Consumers’ perceptions of retail business ethics and loyalty to the retailer: The moderating role of social discount practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 435–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatma, M., & Rahman, Z. (2016). The CSR’s influence on customer responses in Indian banking sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, M. F., & Randall, D. M. (1992). The nature of social desirability response effects in ethics research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(2), 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follows, S. B., & Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: a test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5/6), 723–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(04), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy: strategic options, global considerations. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de los Salmones, M. M. G., del Crespo, A. H., & del Rodríguez Bosque, I. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (2007). Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications (6th edn.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI. (2016). GRI standards. Amsterdam.

  • Groza, M. D., Pronschinske, M. R., & Walker, M. (2011). Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 639–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th edn.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2016). Who says there is an intention-behaviour gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention-behaviour gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied Choice Analysis (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Bagherzadeh, M., & Singh, J. J. (2018). Co-creation: A key link between corporate social responsibility, customer trust, and customer loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4015-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., Singh, J. J., & Sierra, V. (2019). Do customer perceptions of corporate services brand ethicality improve brand equity? Considering the roles of brand heritage, brand image, and recognition benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illia, L., Zyglidopoulos, S. C., Romenti, S., Rodríguez-Cánovas, B., & del V. Brena, A. G (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility to a cynical public. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, Y., Funk, D. C., & McDonald, H. (2017). Predicting behavioral loyalty through corporate social responsibility: The mediating role of involvement and commitment. Journal of Business Research, 75, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. R. (2015). Ethical consumerism isn’t dead, it just needs better marketing. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/01/ethical-consumerism-isnt-dead-it-just-needs-better-marketing.

  • John, S., & Thomson, S. (2003). New Activism and the Corporate Response. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation Research Part A, 69, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. (2017). Consumer Responses to the Food Industry’s Proactive and Passive Environmental CSR, Factoring in Price as CSR Tradeoff. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1973). The major tasks of marketing management. Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuokkanen, H. (2017). Fictitious consumer responsibility? Quantifying social desirability bias in corporate social responsibility surveys. Palgrave Communications, 3.

  • Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause-brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S.-Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C. L. (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Park, T. K., Moon, H. K., Yang, Y. H., & Kim, C. (2009). Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporations, and purchase intentions: A South Korea study. Journal of Business Research, 62(10), 939–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. B., Restori, A. F., & Katz, G. S. (2010). A factor structure and psychometric evaluation of the Hunter Cynicism Scale. Psychology Journal, 7(4), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombart, C., & Louis, D. (2014). A study of the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and price image on retailer personality and consumers’ reactions (satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the retailer). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 630–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2001). Corporate citizenship as a marketing instrument: Concepts, evidence and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 457–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin, L., Ruiz, S., & Rubio, A. (2009). The role of identity salience in the effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, P., & del Bosque, IR. (2013). CSR and customer loyalty: The roles of trust, customer identification with the company and satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1974). The measurement of urban travel demand. Journal of Public Economics, 3, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2010). Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P., & Googins, B. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship. California Management Review, 48(2), 104–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., Eroglu, D., & Ellen, P. S. (1998). The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers’ communications. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(1), 30–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2013). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öberseder, M., Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Murphy, P. E. (2013). CSR practices and consumer perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1839–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odou, P., & de Pechpeyrou, P. (2011). Consumer cynicism. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1799–1808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orazi, D. C., & Chan, E. Y. (2018). “They did not walk the green talk!:” How information specificity influences consumer evaluations of disconfirmed environmental claims. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4028-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaoikonomou, E., Ryan, G., & Ginieis, M. (2011). Towards a holistic approach of the attitude behaviour gap in ethical consumer behaviours: Empirical evidence from Spain. International Advances in Economic Research, 17(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, E., Kim, K. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of consumer loyalty: An examination of ethical standard, satisfaction, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 76.

  • Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The Role of Constructs in Psychological and Educational Measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piga, C. (2002). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective”: A few comments and some suggested extensions. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(December), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, K., Chase, L., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it (Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 12–088). Cambridge, MA.

  • Reilly, T., Saini, A., & Skiba, J. (2018). Ethical purchasing dissonance: Antecedents and coping behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4039-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., Popli, G., & Harris, R. J. (2018). Do environmental concerns affect commuting choices? Hybrid choice modelling with household survey data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society, 181(1), 299–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B. (2013, October). Too many feelings and not enough facts in CSR strategy. Forbes Magazine.

  • Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(02), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business & Society, 53(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seal, T. (2013). Sustainable supply chains: Why placing ethics over profits pays off. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/sustainable-supply-chains-ethics-profits.

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Z., & Zaidman, N. (2010). Strategization of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B. E., de Jong, M. G., & Baumgartner, H. (2010). Socially desirable response tendencies in survey research. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., & Bellamy, L. (2010). Who is responsible for the financial crisis? Lessons from a separation thesis. In W. Sun, J. Stewart, & D. Pollard (Eds.), Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility: Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis (pp. 101–124). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, W., Stewart, J., & Pollard, D. (2010). Reframing corporate social responsibility. In W. Sun, J. Stewart & D. Pollard (Eds.), Reframing Corporate Social Responsibility: Lessons from the Global Financial Crisis (pp. 3–19). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (2nd edn., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd edn.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallaster, C., Lindgreen, A., & Maon, F. (2012). Strategically leveraging corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 54(3), 34–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tulder, R., & van der Zwart, A. (2006). International Business-Society Management: Linking Corporate Responsibility and Globalization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2015). A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2017). The integration of CSR into strategic management: A dynamic approach based on social management philosophy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(1), 89–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P. A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A. P., & Avramidis, P. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2002). Generalized random utility model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43(3), 303–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., & Sillanpää, M. (1997). The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximizing Stakeholder Value. London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis. Business & Society, 35(1), 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTTC. (2017). The Economic Impact of Travel. London.

  • Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanoli, R., Naspetti, S., Janssen, M., & Hamm, U. (2015). Mediation and moderation in food-choice models: a study on the effects of consumer trust in logo on choice. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 72, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840 to 1920. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 53–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut Paul Bocuse, 3 Avenue Guy de Collongue, 69130, Écully, France

    Henri Kuokkanen

  2. Centre for Governance, Leadership and Global Responsibility, Faculty of Business and Law, Leeds Beckett University, The Rose Bowl, Room 562, Portland Crescent, Leeds, LS1 3HB, UK

    William Sun

Authors
  1. Henri Kuokkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henri Kuokkanen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors decalred that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuokkanen, H., Sun, W. Companies, Meet Ethical Consumers: Strategic CSR Management to Impact Consumer Choice. J Bus Ethics 166, 403–423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04145-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04145-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation