Abstract
The canonical Buddhist account of the cognitive processes underlying our experience of the world prefigures recent developments in neuroscience. The developments in question are centered on two main trends in neuroscience research and thinking. The first of these involves the idea that our everyday experience of ourselves and of the world consists in a series of discrete microstates. The second closely related notion is that affective structures and systems play critical roles in governing the formation of such states. Both of these ideas are contained within the Buddhist theory of dependent co-origination. This paper explicates the theory of dependent co-origination in light of the aforementioned developments. It examines the role of the theory of dependent co-origination within Buddhism and it draws attention to critical differences with the neuroscientific account of the same process. Finally, it discusses specific ways in which these differences may be usefully applied to neuroscience research and thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral, D. G., Price, J. L., Pitk¨anen, A. and Carmichael, S. T., 1992: Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex, in J. P. Aggleton (ed.), The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction, Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 1–66.
Damasio, A., 1999: The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotions in the Making of Consciousness, Harcourt, Florida.
Damasio, A., 2003: Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain, Harcourt, Florida.
DeCharms, C. R., 1997: Two Views of Mind: Abhidharma and Brain Science, Snow Lion Publications, Ithaca, NY.
Edelman, G. M. and Tononi, G., 2000: A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination, Basic Books, New York.
Freeman, W. J., 1999: How Brains Make Up Their Minds, Phoenix, London.
Kant, I., 1781/1787/1996: Critique of Pure Reason, W. S. Pluhar (trans.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
Kant, I., 1790/1987: Critique of Judgment, W. S. Pluhar (trans.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
Mookerjee, S., 1935/1993: Buddhist Philosophy of Universal Flux, Motilal Banarsidass, Dehli, India.
LeDoux, J., 2002: Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are, Viking Press, London.
Lehmann, D., Strik, W. K., Henggeler, B., Koenig, T. and Koukkou M., 1998: Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking: I. Visual imagery and abstract thoughts, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 29, 1–11.
Libet, B., 1993: Neurophysiology of Consciousness: Selected Papers and New Essays, Birkh¨auser, Boston.
Liotti, M., Brannan, S., Egan G., Shade, R., Madden, L., Abplanalp, B., Robillard, R., Lancaster, J., Zammaripa, F., Fox, P. and Denton, D., 2000: Brain responses associated with consciousness of breathlessness (air hunger), Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(4), 2035–2040.
Pruden, L. M. (trans.), 1988: AbhidarmakosabhàÇyam, Asian Humanities Press, Berkley.
Schmithausen, L., 1987: âlayavijñàna: On the Origin and Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogàcàra Philosophy, The International Institute for Buddhist Studies, Tokyo.
Spinoza, B., 1677/1982: The Ethics and Selected Letters, S. Shirley (trans.), Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis, IN.
Streng, F., 1967: Emptiness: A Study in Religious Meaning, Abingdon Press, New York.
Waldron, W. S., 1994: How innovative is the àlayavijñàna? The àlayavijñàna in the context of the canonical and Abhidharma Vijñàna theory, part 1, J. Ind. Philos. 22, 199–258.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E., 1991: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurak, M. The Relevance of the Buddhist Theory of Dependent Co-Origination to Cognitive Science. Brain and Mind 4, 341–351 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BRAM.0000005468.95009.86
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BRAM.0000005468.95009.86