Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Satisfaction with Life Scale: Philosophical Foundation and Practical Limitations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research and policymaking on positive mental health and well-being have increased within the last decade, partly fueled by decreasing levels of well-being in the general population and among at-risk groups. However, measurement of well-being often takes place in the absence of reflection on the underlying theoretical conceptualization of well-being. This disguises the fact that different rating scales of well-being often measure very different phenomena because rating scales are based on different philosophical assumptions, which represent radically different foundational views about the nature of well-being. The aim of this paper is to examine the philosophical foundation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in order to clarify the underlying normative commitments and the psychometric compromises involved in the translation of theory into practice. SWLS is widely used by psychologists, public health professionals, economists, and is popular in national and international surveys of well-being. This paper introduces the philosophical theory of life satisfaction and explores how three central discussions within life satisfaction theory are reflected in the construction of the SWLS; (1) Whether we should be equally satisfied with our past, present and future, (2) Whether we should be satisfied with all the various domains of our lives, and (3) How to avoid the trap of “false consciousness”, i.e. that people fail to recognize the injustice or misfortune of their lives. In the end, life satisfaction theory is contrasted with affective foundational theories of well-being, to explore the magnitude and limits of SWLS as a rating scale based on life satisfaction theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Landes, X. (2015). Building happiness indicators some philosophical and political issues. Les ateliers de l’éthique, 10(2), 4–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/1035325ar.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tiberius, V. (2006). Well-being: Psychological research for philosophers. Philosophy Compass, 1(5), 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke, P. J., Melchert, T. P., & Connor, K. (2016). Measuring well-being: A review of instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(5), 730–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016633507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Boer, J. (2014). Scaling happiness. Philosophical Psychology, 27(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2013.792715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haro, J. M., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Bitter, I., Demotes-Mainard, J., Leboyer, M., Lewis, S. W., et al. (2014). ROAMER: roadmap for mental health research in Europe. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(S1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kusier, A. O., & Folker, A. P. (2019). The Well-Being Index WHO-5: Hedonistic foundation and practical limitations. Medical humanities, 46(3), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2018-011636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Angner, E. (2010). Subjective well-being. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(3), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006859511756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McDowell, I. (2010). Measures of self-perceived well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crisp, R. (2017). Well-being. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  12. Feldman, F. (2012). What is this thing called happiness? New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haybron, D. M. (2008). The pusuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kagan, S. (1998). Normative ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Biswas-Diener, R., Kashdan, T. B., & King, L. A. (2009). Two traditions of happiness research, not two distinct types of happiness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760902844400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and Its distinction from hedonia: Developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2017). World happiness report 2017. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helliwell, J., Richard, L., Jeffrey, S., & Jan-Emmanuel, D. (2020). World happiness report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2012). Measurement of and target-setting for well-being: an initiative by the WHO Regional Office for Europe.

  20. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Assessing well-being (pp. 101–117): Springer.

  21. Haybron, D. M. (2011). Happiness. In: Z. N. Edward (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy.

  22. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dierne, E. (2019). Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Whisman, M. A., & Judd, C. M. (2016). A cross-national analysis of measurement invariance of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(2), 239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2(3), 272–297.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, A. B., Pierce, J. D., Chambers, J., Meade, R., Gorvine, B. J., & Koenig, H. G. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, belief in the afterlife, death anxiety, and life satisfaction in young catholics and protestants. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mosher-Ashley, P., & Rabon, C. E. (2001). A comparison of older and younger adults attending alcoholics anonymous. Clinical Gerontologist, 24(1–2), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Heisel, M. J., & Flett, G. L. (2004). Purpose in life, satisfaction with life, and suicide ideation in a clinical sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000013660.22413.e0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fife, J., Adegoke, A., McCoy, J., & Brewer, T. (2011). Religious commitment, social support and life satisfaction among college students. College Student Journal, 45(2), 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(5), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00180-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Braehler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment., 27(2), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdallah, T. (1998). The satisfaction with life scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in an Arabic-speaking sample. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 7(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.1998.9747816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare happiness & ethics. United States: Oxford University Press Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Feldman, F. (2004). Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature varieties and plausibility of hedonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1966). Happiness and time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology, 3(25), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  40. McIntosh, C. N. (2001). Report on the construct validity of the temporal satisfaction with life scale. Social Indicators Research, 54(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual review of psychology, 47(1), 593–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The temporal satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pavot, W. (2014). Temporal satisfaction with life scale (TSWLS). In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6609–6611). Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Alexandrova, A. (2017). The science of Well-being. In: G. Fletcher (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-being: Routledge.

  46. Haybron, D. M. (2011). Taking the satisfaction (and the life) out of life satisfaction. Philosophical Explorations, 14(3), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Topp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015). The WHO-5 well-being index: A systematic review of the literature. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(3), 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Haybron, D. M. (2013). Happiness: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Kettlewell, N., Morris, R. W., Ho, N., Cobb-Clark, D. A., Cripps, S., & Glozier, N. (2020). The differential impact of major life events on cognitive and affective wellbeing. SSM-Population Health, 10, 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Research Department for Health and Social Context, National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestraede 6, 1455, Copenhagen K, Denmark

    Amalie Oxholm Kusier & Anna Paldam Folker

Authors
  1. Amalie Oxholm Kusier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anna Paldam Folker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors have contributed equally to the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amalie Oxholm Kusier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for Publication

The work presented in this paper has been developed without the involvement of patients and the public.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kusier, A.O., Folker, A.P. The Satisfaction with Life Scale: Philosophical Foundation and Practical Limitations. Health Care Anal 29, 21–38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00420-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-020-00420-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation