Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T11:29:44.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Epistemological Disjunctivist Account of Memory Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

Kwok Chung Him
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Shane Ryan
Affiliation:
Singapore Management University, Singapore
Chienkuo Mi*
Affiliation:
Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: cmi@scu.edu.tw

Abstract

This paper explores the prospects for a Pritchardean epistemological disjunctivist account of memory knowledge. We begin by providing an overview of Duncan Pritchard's epistemological disjunctivist account of perceptual knowledge, as well as the theoretical advantages of such an account. Drawing on that account, we present and motivate our own Pritchardean epistemological disjunctivist account of memory knowledge. After distinguishing different sorts of memory and the different roles that memory can play in knowledge acquisition, we set out our account and argue that the case for epistemological disjunctivism enjoys parity with the case for epistemological disjunctivism of perceptual knowledge. We also consider objections to our account. The first is from Joe Milburn and Andrew Moon, who argue against a general epistemological disjunctivism of memory on the basis of differences in memory types. The second objection arises from a Radford-like case whereby one's true belief is from memory even though one lacks rational support that is reflectively accessible to one.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernecker, S. (2008). The Metaphysics of Memory. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernecker, S. (2010). Memory: A Philosophical Study. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Budson, A.E. and Price, B.H. (2005). ‘Memory Dysfunction.’ New England Journal of Medicine 352(7), 692–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassam, Q. (2007). The Possibility of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. (1969). Seeing and Knowing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (1970). ‘Epistemic Operator.’ Journal of Philosophy 67, 1007–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghijsen, H. (2015). ‘The Basis Problem for Epistemological Disjunctivism Revisited.’ Erkenntnis 80, 1147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C.B. and Deutscher, M. (1966). ‘Remembering.’ The Philosophical Review 75(2), 161–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1998). ‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.’ In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp. 228–59. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Michaelian, K. and Sutton, J. (2017). ‘Memory.’ In E.N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/memory/.Google Scholar
Milburn, J. and Moon, A. (2019). ‘Two Forms of Memory Knowledge and Epistemological Disjunctivism.’ In Doyle, C., Milburn, J. and Pritchard, D. (eds), New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism, pp. 281–97. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2011). ‘Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Basis Problem.’ Philosophical Perspectives 21(1), 434–55.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2012). Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2016). Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, C. (1966). ‘Knowledge – By Examples.’ Analysis 27(1), 111.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1921). The Analysis of Mind. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schwarz, A. (2018). ‘Memory and Disjunctivism.’ Essays in Philosophy 19(2), article 4.Google Scholar
Shaw, K.J. (2019). ‘The Bifurcated Conception of Perceptual Knowledge: A New Solution to the Basis Problem for Epistemological Disjunctivism.’ Synthese 196(7), 2871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. and Stanley, J. (2001). ‘Knowing How.’ Journal of Philosophy 98(8), 411–44.Google Scholar