We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 January 2009
The British utilitarians are not generally considered explorers of classical Greek thought. This paper examines the contribution of James Mill, John Stuart Mill, and George Grote to the development of Platonic studies in nineteenth-century Britain. Their understanding of Platonic philosophy challenged prevalent interpretations, and caused a fruitful debate over long neglected aspects of Plato's thought. Grote's Platonic analysis, which comes last in order of time, cannot, of course, be considered in isolation from the relevant debates in Germany. Grote, the erudite historian of ancient Greece, paid considerable attention to the arguments of the German classicists, put forward in many cases a new point of view, and prompted a radical revaluation of Platonic political thought.
1 See a few representative examples in Warburton, William, The Divine Legation of Moses, London, 2 vols., 1738–1741, i.412Google Scholar; Stanley, T., 4th edn., The History of Philosophy, London, 1743, p. 164Google Scholar; Morgan, C., An Investigation of the Trinity of Plato and of Philo Judaeus, London, 1795Google Scholar; Bryant, Jacob, A Treatise upon the Authenticity of the Scriptures and the Truth of the Christian Religion, London, 1810, p. 7Google Scholar; Nares, R., Essay on the Demon or Divination of Socrates, London, 1782Google Scholar; Ogilvie, John, The Theology of Plato compared with the Principles of Oriental and Grecian Philosophers, London, 1793Google Scholar; Priestley, Joseph, The Doctrines of Heathen Philosophy, compared with those of Revelation, Northumberland, 1804, pp. 127–8Google Scholar.
2 Macfait, E., Remarks on the Life and Writings of Plato. With Answers to the principal Objections against him; and a general view of his Dialogues, Edinburgh and London, 1760, p. 3Google Scholar.
3 See his Synopsis or General View of the Works of Plato, London, 1759Google Scholar, and the translated dialogues with copious notes from 1759 to his death.
4 Taylor, T., The Works of Plato, 5 vols., London, 1804, i.p.iiiGoogle Scholar. See further, his Commentaries of Proclus on the Timaeus of Plato, London, 1820Google Scholar, and Collectanea; or, Collections, consisting of Miscellanies, inserted by Thomas Taylor, in the European and Monthly Magazines, London, 1806Google Scholar. For more information see, Raine, K. and Harper, G. M., eds., Thomas Taylor the Platonist: Selected Writings, Princeton, 1969Google Scholar.
5 Butler, W. A., Lectures on the History of Ancient Philosophy 2 vols., Cambridge, 1856, ii.61–2Google Scholar; Sewell, W., Introduction to the Dialogues of Plato, Oxford, 1841, pp. 62–3Google Scholar.
6 Sewell, p. 24; Hampden, R. D., The Fathers of Greek Philosophy, Edinburgh, 1862, p. 188Google Scholar. See also Butler, ii.154.
7 Butler, ii.20–8; similarly Hampden, pp. 300–1, 353.
8 Butler, ii.160.
9 Blackie, J. S., ‘Plato’, in Edinburgh Essays by Members of the University, Edinburgh, 1857, p. 9Google Scholar. Blackie, attacked Utilitarianism vigorously in his Four Phases of Morals. Socrates, Aristotle, Christianity, Utilitarianism, Edinburgh, 1871Google Scholar. See also Jowett, B., Dialogues of Plato, 5 vols., [1871], London, 1892, i.p.xiGoogle Scholar.; Potter, J. P., Characteristics of the Greek Philosophers. Socrates and Plato, London, 1845, pp. 37–58Google Scholar; Lowndes, W., Remarks on the Life and Writings of Plato, London, 1827Google Scholar; Griffiths, E. T., Plato, as read in English by an Englishman, London, 1854Google Scholar; Cary, H., The Works of Plato, London, 1848Google Scholar; Chatterton, G., Selections from the Works of Plato, London, 1862Google Scholar; and, Blackie, , ‘Plato and Christianity’, North British Review, XXXV (1861), 369–73Google Scholar, emphasized Plato's service to Christianity through unassisted reason.
10 Jenkyns, R., The Victorians and Ancient Greece, Oxford, 1980, p. 228Google Scholar. See also, Clarke, M. L., Greek Studies in England: 1700–1830, Cambridge, 1945, p. 112Google Scholar; and Manasse, E. M., ‘Platonism since the Enlightenment’, Dictionary of the History of Ideas, ed. Wiener, Philip, 5 vols., New York, 1973–1974, iii.516–17Google Scholar.
11 Quoted in Turner, F. M., The Greek Heritage in Victorian Britain, New Haven and London, 1981, p. 371 n.4Google Scholar; Blackie, J. S., ‘Plato’;, p. 6Google Scholar; Lewes, G. H., A Biographical History of Philosophy, 2 vols., London, 1845–1851, ii.30Google Scholar. Lowndes called attention to the ‘disregard shewn to Plato in our public schools and universities’, and especially from persons ‘of general learning and intelligence’. See Lowndes, p. 34. B. B. Edwards and E. A. Park argued that Plato was unsuited to the British practical mind; Selections from German Literature, New York, 1839, pp. 3–5Google Scholar.
12 Tennemann, W. G., A Manual of the History of Philosophy, Oxford, 1832Google Scholar; Schleiermacher, F. D. E., Introductions to the Dialogues of Plato, Cambridge, 1836Google Scholar; Ritter, H.,The History of Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 1838Google Scholar.
13 Bain, Alexander, ed., The Minor Works of George Grote, London, 1873, p. 284Google Scholar.
14 See the list in Bain, A., James Mill, A Biography, London, 1882, pp. 18–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See further, Cumming, Ian, ‘The Scottish Education of James Mill’, History of Education Quarterly, ii (1962), 162–3Google Scholar; and Pappe, H. O., ‘The English Utilitarians and Athenian Democracy’, in Classical Influences on Western Thought A.D. 1650–1870, ed. Bolgar, R. R., Cambridge, 1979, 295–6Google Scholar.
15 For the event, see Bain, , James Mill, p. 166Google Scholar.
16 Mill, J. S., Autobiography, ed. Stillinger, Jack, Oxford, 1971, pp. 5–6, 9, 14–15Google Scholar.
17 Ibid., p. 14.
18 Mill, James, ‘Taylor's Translation of Plato’, Literary Journal, iii (1804), 449Google Scholar.
19 See Burston, W. H., James Mill on Education, Cambridge, 1969, pp. 8–9, 33Google Scholar.
20 BL Add. MS 29,529 (1818–1822) fo. 29.
21 Benn, A. W. insisted on Mill's ‘Hellenising tendency’, The History of English Rationalism in the Nineteenth Century, 2 vols., London, 1906, i.293–5Google Scholar; similarly Bower, G. S., Hartley and James Mill, London, 1881, p. 11Google Scholar; Stephen, L., The English Utilitarians, 3 vols., London, 1900, ii.3Google Scholar; Fenn, R., James Mill's Political Thought, New York and London, 1987, p. 79Google Scholar; Jenkyns, p. 233.
22 Mill, James, An Essay on Government, ed. Barker, E., Cambridge, 1937, p. 16Google Scholar.
23 Mill, James, ‘Taylor's Plato’, Edinburgh Review, xiv (1809), 191–3Google Scholar; ‘Taylor's Translation of Plato’, 454.
24 ‘Taylor's Plato’, 199.
25 ‘Taylor's Translation of Plat’, 453.
26 ‘Taylor's Plato’, 199.
27 Mill, John Stuart, The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, ed. Mineka, Francis E. and Lindley, Dwight N., Toronto, 1972Google Scholar, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (hereafter CW) xvi.1010.
28 Grote, Harriet, The Personal Life of George Grote, London, 1873, p. 276Google Scholar. See also CW xvi.1120, 1160 (letters addressed to Grote, dated 26 Nov. 1865, and 22 April 1866 respectively).
29 Grote, , Personal Life, p. 263Google Scholar. Grote was writing to Mill after the latter's decision to review the Plato: ‘It will be an additional incentive to my industry now that I learn your obliging intention to review the book in Edinburgh Review. That will be a genuine service to the work, as well as a compliment to myself.’
30 Borchardt, R., ed., Four Dialogues of Plato, trans, with notes by Mill, J. S., London, 1946, p. 23Google Scholar.
31 Bain, A., John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections, London, 1882, p. 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
32 See Mill, John Stuart, Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1978, CW, xi.175–238Google Scholar.
33 Mill, , Autobiography, p. 119Google Scholar. Packe, M. S. J. puts them after his ‘crisis’, at around 1826Google Scholar, and as intended to produce therapeutic effect. See The Life of John Stuart Mill, London, 1954, p. 136Google Scholar. F. E. Sparshott shows, however, that they were written later than this period, and possibly in 1828; see CW, xi. pp. xviii–xx.
34 Ibid., 39.
35 Ibid., 40.
36 Ibid., 40, 415.
37 See Schleiermacher, F. D. E., ‘On the Worth of Socrates as a Philosopher’, trans. Thirlwall, Connop, Philological Museum, ii (1833), 538–55Google Scholar.
38 Mill, , Autobiography, p. 15Google Scholar.
39 See The Early Draft of John Stuart Mill's ‘Autobiography’, ed. Stillinger, J., Urbana, 1961, p. 48Google Scholar.
40 Mill, John Stuart, Essays on Politics and Society, ed. Robson, John M., 2 vols., Toronto, 1977, CW, xviii.251Google Scholar.
41 Mill, , Autobiography, pp. 14–15Google Scholar. (The phrase is borrowed from Bacon, , ‘Instauratio Magna’, Novum Organum, The Works of Francis Bacon, ed. Spedding, , Ellis, , Heath, , 14 vols., 1857–1874, i.138,160Google Scholar; see CW, xi.310, editor's note.)
42 Mill, John Stuart, Essays on Equality, Law, and Education, ed. Robson, John M., Toronto, 1984, CW, xxi.229–30Google Scholar.
43 CW, xi.42.
44 Ibid., 43. Grote, similarly argued that ‘Plato is a searcher, and has not yet made up his own mind’ Plato and the other Companions of Sokrates, 3 vols., London, 1865, i.246Google Scholar.
45 John Gillies, the historian of Greece and translator of Aristotle, argued earlier that the character of the sophists was generally misunderstood; but his defence was rather incidental. See The Orations of Lysias and Isocrates, trans, with notes, London, 1778, pp. 16–17Google Scholar.
46 Thomas Mitchell, an influential philologist, had characteristically described his undertaking to give an account of the sophists, as a ‘melancholy task … to follow this pestilent race into their dark recesses, and to point out by what means they endeavoured to effect that dislocation and looseness in the moral frame, which their infamous doctrines caused among the men of Greece.’ See, ‘Panegyrical Oratory of Greece“, Quarterly Review, xxvii (1822), 385Google Scholar.
47 CW, xi.61.
48 Ibid., 62.
49 Ibid., 93–5.
50 See Patrides, C. A., The Cambridge Platonists, Cambridge, 1969, p. 3Google Scholar.
51 Grote, , Personal Life, p. 225Google Scholar. His manuscripts reveal that he had embarked on the preparation of his work much earlier. See Smith's, William remarks, in ‘George Grote’, Quarterly Review, cxxxv (1873), 111Google Scholar ; and MrsGrote's, letter to her sister, in The Lewin Letters, ed. Lewin, T. H., 2 vols., London, 1909, ii.243Google Scholar.
52 Republic, 457b (Jowett's translation). See further Grote's, ‘Notes and Extracts from Commonplace Books’, Posthumous Papers, ed. Grote, H., London, 1874, pp. 165, 195Google Scholar.
53 Gregory Vlastos called Grote the ‘prince of Victorian Platonists; Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher, Cambridge, 1991, p. 4Google Scholar. E. M. Cope judged Grote's work on Plato, as ‘the inauguration of a new era of Platonic criticism’, as indeed it has been. See, Plato's ‘Theaetetus’ and Mr Grote's Criticisms, London, 1866, p. 6Google Scholar. Similarly see, Maurice, F. D., Moral and Metaphysical Philosophy, 2 vols., London, 1882, i.117Google Scholar; Gomperz, T., Greek Thinkers, 4 vols., London, 1901–1912, ii.104Google Scholar; Sidgwick, H., ‘The Sophists’, in Lectures on the Philosophy of Kant, London 1905, p. 323Google Scholar.
54 Notoriously Bentham called Plato ‘the master manufacturer of nonsense’; Bentham, Jeremy, Deontology, ed. Goldworth, A., Oxford, 1983Google Scholar (The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham), p. 137.
55 Grote, , Plato, i.170Google Scholar.
56 Schleiermacher, , Dialogues of Plato, pp. 5, 18Google Scholar.
57 Hermann, K. F., Geschichte und System der Platonischen Philosophie, Heidelberg, 1839, pp. 368–98Google Scholar.
58 Ast, F., Platons Leben und Schriften, Leipzig, 1816, p. 40Google Scholar.
59 The following scholars rejected many compositions as spurious: Hermann, pp. 413–31; Ast, rejected the Laws, the Meno, Apology, Crito, Euthydemus, Laches, Charmides, Lysis, see pp. 376–85Google Scholar; Ritter, , History of Ancient Philosophy, pp. 162–5Google Scholar; Zeller, E., Platonische Studien, Tubingen, 1839, pp. 1–131Google Scholar; Suckow, G. F. W., Die Wissenschaftliche und Kunstlerische Form der Platonischen Schriften, Berlin, 1855, pp. 414–15Google Scholar ; Socher, J., Ueber Platons Schriften, Munich, 1820, pp. 262–91Google Scholar; Ueberweg, F., Untersuchungen uber die Echtheit und Zeitfolge Platonischen Schriften, Vienna, 1861, pp. 108–12Google Scholar; Schone, Richard, Uber Platonis Protagoras, Leipzig, 1862, p. 15Google Scholar. Note that W. Whewell, following the German line of thought, rejected the Parmenides as spurious. See, The Platonic Theory of Ideas, Cambridge, 1856Google Scholar.
60 See Jubert's, Leo relevant praise of Grote's critique, ‘Platon et l'ecole Socratique devant la critique moderne’, Revue Contemporaine, xlvii (1865), 628–9Google Scholar.
61 Grote, , Plato, i.260nGoogle Scholar.
62 Ibid., 214.
63 Ibid., 274.
64 BL Add. MS 29,522, fo. 9. See also Grote, , Plato, i.237, ii.399Google Scholar.
65 Ibid., i.276. Cf. Campbell, Lewis, The Theaetetus of Plato, Oxford, 1861, p.ixGoogle Scholar.
66 Grote, , Plato, i.295, ii.157, iii.335Google Scholar.
67 Ibid., i.270. Cf. Whewell, William, The Platonic Dialogues for English Readers, Cambridge and London, 3 vols., 1859–1961, iii.p.viiGoogle Scholar. Note that Whewell confessed that his ‘previous speculations about Plato and his companions, … [were[ completely overpast, and superseded by the clearer, better, and more solidly demonstrated views’ of Grote, Letter sent to Grote, quoted in Grote, , Posthumous Papers, pp. 131–2Google Scholar.
68 Grote, , Plato, i.15, ii.297Google Scholar. For the classification see Diogenes Laertius III.57–61.
69 See Pangle, T. L., The Roots of Political Philosophy. Ten Forgotten Socratic Dialogues, Ithaca and London, 1987, p. 6Google Scholar.
70 Grote, , Plato, i. 146–51Google Scholar. It is worthwhile to note that Grote's assumption of an ‘Academy edition’ was defended in modern times. See, e.g. Pfeiffer, R., History of Classical Scholarship, Oxford, 1968, pp. 65–6Google Scholar; Philip, J. A., ‘The Platonic Corpus’, Phoenix, xxiv (1970), 306Google Scholar; Solmsen, F., ‘The Academic and Alexandrian Editions of Plato's Works’, Illinois Classical Studies, vi (1981), 102Google Scholar.
71 It is remarkable that even Tennemann, W. G., who wrote at the end of the eighteenth century the voluminous System der Platonischen Philosophic, Leipzig, 1792–1795Google Scholar, had not challenged the traditional treatment of the corpus. Neither Sydenham nor Taylor gave signs of such a tendency in their works.
72 Davies, J. L., and Vaughan, D. J., who edited the Republic in 1866Google Scholar argued that Grote, ‘in his zeal to take Plato down from his superhuman pedestal’, was ready to accept all works as genuine, The Republic of Plato, 3rd edn., London, 1866, p. viGoogle Scholar. See also the critique of Grote's, view by Blackley, W. L., ‘The authenticity of the works of Plato’, Fortnightly Review, ii (1867), 273Google Scholar; Campbell, L., ‘Grote's Plato’, Quarterly Review, cxix (1866), 144Google Scholar; Benn, A. W., ‘Plato and his Times’, Westminster Review, cxiv (1880), 392Google Scholar. Lewes, G. H., ‘Grote's Plato’, Fortnightly Review, ii (1865), 178–9Google Scholar, and Thursfield, J. R., ‘Grote's Plato’, Westminster Review, lxxxiv (1865), 465Google Scholar, welcomed Grote's argument.
73 See Popper, K. R., The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2nd edn., 2 vols., London, 1952, i.216Google Scholar. W. C. Greene conceived of Grote as the predecessor of anti-Platonists. See, ‘Platonism and its Critics’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, lxi (1953), 41Google Scholar. See also, Fite, W., The Platonic Legend, London, 1934, p. 4Google Scholar.
74 Cicero, , Academics Liv.16Google Scholar. See also Diogenes Laertius 111.52.
75 Grote, , Plato, i.278, 324–5, ii.5, 563Google Scholar.
76 Ibid., ii.373. Sewell related Plato's thought with the intuitionist conception of epistemology; see p. 96. See also Whewell's, W. ‘On Plato's Survey of the Sciences’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, ix (1856), 582–9Google Scholar.
77 Grote, , Plato, i.231Google Scholar.
78 See Gillies, John, History of Ancient Greece, 3rd edn., London, 1792Google Scholar; Mitford, William, The History of Greece, 3rd edn., London, 1808Google Scholar. Similarly, see Goldsmith, Oliver, Grecian History, London, 1774Google Scholar, and Stanyan, Temple, The Grecian History, London, 1781Google Scholar.
79 The works of Drummond, William, A Review of the Governments of Sparta and Athens, London, 1794Google Scholar; and Young, William, The History of Athens, London, 1804Google Scholar, had been minor exceptions. However, they were both active politicians rather than scholars, and their arguments, poorly supported by evidence, betray much political prejudice.
80 Grote, , Plato, iii.434Google Scholar.
81 Ibid., 426.
82 Grote, , A History of Greece, 6th edn., 10 vols., London, 1888, vii.738Google Scholar.
83 Grote, , Plato, ii.138Google Scholar.
84 Ibid., 138, iii.211,187, 215, 240.
85 See ibid., ii.490; and BL Add. MS 29,521, fo. 16.
86 Grote, , Plato, iii.409–10, 460Google Scholar.
87 Owen, J., ‘George Grote’, Theological Review, x (1873), 516Google Scholar. Plato, , stated Jowett, B., ‘is not to be measured by the standard of Utilitarianism’, Dialogues of Plato, i.p.xiGoogle Scholar. See also Caird, E., ‘Plato and the other companions of Socrates’, North British Review, xliii (1865), 354Google Scholar; Campbell, L., ‘Grote's Plato’, 125Google Scholar, and Theaetetus of Plato, p. viii; Maguire, Thomas, Essays on the Platonic Ethics, London, 1870, p. 34Google Scholar. B. F. Westcott argued that the positive-prophetic side of Plato requires the most serious consideration. See, ‘The Myths of Plato’, Contemporary Review, ii (1866), 480–1Google Scholar.
88 See e.g. Mackay, R. W., The Sophistes of Plato: A dialogue on true and false teaching, with an introduction on ancient and modern sophistry, London and Edinburgh, 1868, p. 47Google Scholar; Blackie, J. S., Horae Hellenicae, London, 1874, p. 197Google Scholar. As E. R. Dodds noted, Grote was the first who attempted to upset Plato's verdict, but the late Victorian scholars believed that the sophists ‘were no better than Benthamites’. See ‘The Sophistic Movement and the Failure of Greek Liberalism’, in The Ancient Concept of Progress and other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief, Oxford, 1973, pp. 92–3Google Scholar.
89 Sparshott, F. E., speaking about Grote's defence of the sophists, called them ‘philosophic radicals’, ‘Introduction’, in Mill's, J. S. CW, xi.pp.xxii and xxxiiiGoogle Scholar. See also Borchardt, p. 21; Turner, pp. 392, 396.
90 See the 67th chapter of his History of Greece, vii.1–80, and Grote, , Plato, iii.140Google Scholar.
91 See Grote, BL Add. MS 29,529, fo. 35: ‘Plato ventures to claim in his Republic, the coincidence of philosophy and power in the same hands’, i.e. tested knowledge with efficient political administration. Grote is obviously not in disagreement with Plato's underlying idea of the Republic, but only with its practical implications.
92 Grote, himself, took seriously his role as providing a vindication of Plato's philosophy. See History of Greece, vii.62.
93 See Bain's, A. review of the Plato, in Macmillan's Magazine, xii (1865), 472Google Scholar.
