Notes
In part A.1 of the Appendix, Madary instructs the reader as to where to find these ideas in Husserl’s works (Madary 2017, pp. 177–180).
For Husserl’s contrastive discussion of perceptual emptiness and indeterminacy, see Husserl 1973, §18, especially pp. 57–59.
Just to be clear, I do not notice that Madary speaks about fullness or emptiness in other terms either. In particular, I have no special reason to believe that, for him, “determinacy” and “indeterminacy” might (sometimes) just mean fullness and emptiness.
For Husserl’s evidential conception of intentionality and objectivity, see Husserl 1974 , pp. 143–144.
References
Husserl, E. (1973). Ding und Raum. Vorlesungen 1907 (Hua XVI). (U. Claesges, Ed.) The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. (1974). Formale und Transzendentale Logic (Hua XVII). (P. Janssen, Ed.) The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Njihoff.
Husserl, E. (1984). Logische Untersuchungen (Hua XIX/2). (U. Panzer, Ed.) The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Laasik, K. (2014). Constitutive strata and the dorsal stream. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 419–435.
Madary, M. (2011). The dorsal stream and the visual horizon. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10, 423–438.
Madary, M. (2017). Visual Phenomenology. MIT Press.
Mehta, N. (2019). Michael Madary, Visual Phenomenology. The Philosophical Review, 128(1), 131–134.
Mensch, J. R. (2010). Husserl’s Account of Our Consciousness of Time. Marquette University Press.
Siegel, S. (2010a). Do Experiences Have Contents? In B. Nanay (Ed.), Perceiving the World (pp. 333–368). Oxford University Press.
Siegel, S. (2010b). The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford University Press.
Siegel, S. (2017.09.10). Michael Madary, Visual Phenomenology. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/visual-phenomenology/.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Humanities and Social Sciences General Research Project of the Chinese Ministry of Education, titled Perceptual Experience: Beyond the Mainstream Intentional Approach (21YJA720001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laasik, K. Review of Michael Madary’s Visual Phenomenology. Husserl Stud 38, 97–105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-021-09296-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-021-09296-9