Skip to main content
Log in

Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing: An Ethical Assessment

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Daoist philosophy, the self is understood as an individual interdependent with others, and situated within a broader environment. Within this framework, the concept ziran is frequently understood in terms of naturalness or nature while wuwei is explained in terms of non-oppressive government. In many existing accounts, little is done to connect these two key Daoist concepts. Here, I suggest that wuwei and ziran are correlated, ethical, concepts. Together, they provide a unifying ethical framework for understanding the philosophy of the Daodejing. I explore the meaning of ziran as self-so-ness or, in human terms, as pertaining to an individual’s spontaneity. The appropriate response to the spontaneity of individuals is to avoid, insofar as possible, imposing or using restrictive norms and methods, that is, wuwei. According to this view, ziran and wuwei offer an account of ethics that attends to core notions of interdependent selfhood, including mutuality, relationality, interdependence, symbiosis, and responsiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger. 1994. The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, Roger, and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 2003. Daodejing: A Philosophical Translation. USA: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Alan. 1991. Two Visions of the Way: A Study of the W ang Pi and Ho-Shang Kung Commentaries on the Lao-tzu. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing tsit. 1963. The Way of Lao Tzu. NY: The Library of Liberal Arts, Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Chung-ying. 1986. “On the Environmental Ethics of the Tao and the Ch’i.” Environmental Ethics 8: 351–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. 1999. “Mysticism and Apophatic Discourse in the Laozi.” In Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Ed. By Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip Ivanhoe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, David. 1994. “Is Daoism ‘Green’?” Asian Philosophy 4.2: 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bary, Wm Theodore, and Irene Bloom, eds. 1999. “Syncretic Visions of State, Society and Cosmos.” In Sources of Chinese Tradition. Vol. 1, NY: Columbia University Press.

  • Duan, Yucai. 段玉裁. 1981. Shuowen Jiezi Zhu 說文解字注 (Shuowen Lexicon). Reprinted from the original (1815). Shanghai: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe.

  • Erkes, Eduard, trans. 1950. Ho-Shang-Kung’s Commentary on Lao-Tse. Ascona, Switzerland: Artibus Asiæ.

  • Fox, Alan. 1996. “Reflex and Reflexivity: Wuwei in the Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 6.1: 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 1986. “Yin-Yang and the Nature of Correlative Thinking.” Occasional Paper and Monograph Series, No. 6. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao. Illinois: Open Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenmark, Max. 1969. Lao Tzu and Taoism (translated from the French by Roger Greaves). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Karyn. 2003. “Conceptual Foundations for Environmental Ethics: A Daoist Perspective.” Environmental Ethics 25: 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______. 2006a. “Li in the Analects: Training in Moral Competence and the Question of Flexibility.” Philosophy East and West 56.1: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _______. 2006b. Learning from Chinese Philosophies: Ethics of Interdependent and Contextualised Self. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Dim-cheuk. 1963. Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiaogan. 1999. “An Inquiry into the Core Value of Laozi’s Philosophy.” In Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi. Ed. by Mark Csikszentmihalyi and Philip Ivanhoe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, Ariane, trans. 1979. Commentary on the Lao Tzu by Wang Pi. In collaboration with Wing-tsit Chan. Monograph No. 6 of the Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.

  • Schwartz, Benjamin. 1985. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waley, Arthur. 1958. The Way and Its Power: A Study of the Tao Te Ching and its Place in Chinese Thought. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karyn Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lai, K. Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing: An Ethical Assessment. Dao 6, 325–337 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9019-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9019-8

Keywords

Navigation