Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T06:55:39.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on Didache 1, 2, and Acts 15, 20. 29

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

K. Lake
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , April 1897 , pp. 147 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1897

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 148 note 1 It would make the theory of the dependence of the Διδαχ⋯ on the Western Acts far easier, and perhaps render the assumption of Blass' view unnecessary, if we thought that the absence of this passage in Barnabas pointed to its absence in the ‘Two Ways.’

page 148 note 2 The fact that the Western reading in St. Luke is probably a ‘non-interpolation’ according to W.H. has also an obvious bearing on the subject.