Abstract
Primitive ontology is a recently much discussed approach to the ontology of quantum theory according to which the theory is ultimately about entities in 3-dimensional space and their temporal evolution. This paper critically discusses the primitive ontologies that have been suggested within the Bohmian approach to quantum field theory in the light of the existence of unitarily inequivalent representations. These primitive ontologies rely either on a Fock space representation or a wave functional representation, which are strictly speaking unambiguously available only for free systems in flat spacetime. As a consequence, it is argued that they do not constitute fundamental ontologies for quantum field theory, in contrast to the case of the Bohmian approach to quantum mechanics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2008). On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 353–389.
Arageorgis, A., Earman, J., & Ruetsche, L. (2002). Weyling the time away: the non-unitary implementability of quantum field dynamics on curved spacetime. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33, 151–184.
Baker, D.J. (2009). Against field interpretations of quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 60, 585–609.
Bell, J.S. (1987). Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belot, G. (2012). Quantum states for primitive ontologists. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2, 67–83.
Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2001). Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52, 417–470.
Colin, S., & Stuyve, W. (2007). A Dirac sea pilot-wave model for quantum field theory. Journal of Physics A, 40, 7309–7342.
Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1997). Naive realism about operators. Erkenntnis, 45, 379–397.
Dürr, D., & Teufel, S. (2009). Bohmian mechanics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N. (2004). Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory. Physical Review Letters, 93, 090402.
Earman, J. (2004). Curie’s principle and spontaneous symmetry breaking. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18, 173–198.
Earman, J. (2008). Superselection rules for philosophers. Erkenntnis, 69, 377–414.
Earman, J., & Fraser, D. (2006). Haag’s theorem and its implications for the foundations of quantum field theory. Erkenntnis, 64, 305–344.
Fraser, D. (2008). The fate of ‘particle’ in quantum field theories with interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, 841–859.
Ruestche, L. (2011). Interpreting quantum theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Struyve, W. (2010). Pilot-wave theory and quantum fields. Reports on Progress in Physics, 73, 106001.
Struyve, W., & Westman, H. (2007). A minimalist pilot-wave model for quantum electrodynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 463, 3115–3129.
Tumulka, Roderich (2006). On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 462, 1897–1908.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione grant PZ00P1 142536/1) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, V. Primitive ontology and quantum field theory. Euro Jnl Phil Sci 5, 387–397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-015-0113-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-015-0113-1