Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A note on decisions under uncertainty: the impact of the choice of the welfare measure

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper addresses the question, how policy decisions under uncertainty depend on the underlying welfare concept. We study three different welfare measures: The first is directly based on the ex ante (expected) utility of a representative consumer whereas the second relies on an ex ante and the third on an ex post valuation of policy changes compared to the status quo. We show that decisions based on these measures coincide if and only if risk-neutral expected utility maximization is applied. Differences between the decisions are analyzed for both, risk-averse expected utility maximization and the MaxiMin criterion. For risk-averse decision makers, differences between the first and the second concept arise if the absolute risk-aversion of the decision maker is not constant in income. For risk-aversion and the MaxiMin criterion, the effort levels to provide a public good based on an optimization of ex post utility changes exceed those based on the first or second concept. Implications for environmental policy decisions based on the concepts of abatement costs and benefits from abatement are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bishop, R.C. (1986), Resource valuation under uncertainty: Principles for empirical research, in: Smith, V.K. (ed.), Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 4, Jai Press, Greenwich CT, pp. 133-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eismont, O. and Welsch, H. (1996), Optimal greenhouse gas emissions under various assessments of climate change ambiguity, Environmental and Resource Economics 8: 129-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D.A. (1981), Cost benefit analysis under uncertainty, American Economic Review 71: 715-725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, N. and Spash, C.L. (1995), Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, C.E. and Randall, A. (1991), Use value under uncertainty: Is there a ‘correct’ measure?, Land Economics 67: 378-389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ready, R. (1995), Environmental valuation under uncertainty, in: Bromley, D.W. (ed.) The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 568-593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. (1997), Global warming, irreversibility and learning, The Economic Journal, 636-650.

  • Welsch, H. (1995), Greenhouse gas abatement under ambiguity, Energy Economics 17: 91-100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Interdisciplinary Institute for Environmental Economics, University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Strasse 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    Andreas Lange

Authors
  1. Andreas Lange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Lange.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, A. A note on decisions under uncertainty: the impact of the choice of the welfare measure. Theory and Decision 51, 51–71 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012498106199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012498106199

Search

Navigation