Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T23:08:42.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INDIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, THE BIRTH OF THE MODERN DISCIPLINE AND “THE DESTINY OF ONE NATION”, 1905–1947*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2013

ARIA LASKIN
ARIA LASKIN*
Affiliation:
JD candidate, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto E-mail: aria.laskin@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the age of decolonization, Indian psychology engaged with and nationalized itself within global networks of ideas. While psychology was eventually applied by public intellectuals in explicitly political arenas, this essay focuses on the initial mobilization of the discipline's early Indian experts, led by the founder of the Indian Psychological Association, Narendranath Sengupta. Although modern critics have harshly judged early Indian psychologists for blind appropriation of European concepts, an analysis of the networks through which the science of psychology was developed challenges this oversimplification. Early Indian psychologists developed their discipline within a simultaneously transnational and nationalistic context, in which European ideas overlapped with ancient texts, creating a deliberately “Indian” brand of psychology. As the discipline of psychology exploded across the world, Indian psychologists developed a science of swaraj, enabling synergies between modern psychological doctrine, philosophy and ancient texts. This paper explores the networks of ideas within which modern Indian psychology was developed, the institutional and civil environment in which it matured, and the framework through which it engaged with and attempted to claim credence within transnational scientific networks.

Type
Forum: A World of Ideas: New Pathways in Global Intellectual History, c.1880–1930
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , August 2013 , pp. 415 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author owes a debt of gratitude to Chris Bayly, who provided crucial feedback and introduced her to the study of intellectual history. She is also deeply grateful to Shruti Kapila, for her continued guidance and insight in supervising the author's MA dissertation, which formed the basis of this essay.

References

1 Banerji, M., “Applied Psychology”, Indian Journal of Psychology (hereafter IJP) 9/1 (1934), 1–18, 2Google Scholar.

2 For more information on the historiography of colonial mental health science see Vaughan, M., “Introduction”, in Vaughan, M. and Mahone, S., eds., Psychiatry and Empire (Basingstoke, 2007), 1–16Google Scholar.

3 See, for example, S. Kapila, “The ‘Godless’ Freud and His Indian Friends: An Indian Agenda for Psychoanalysis”, in Vaughan and Mahone, Psychiatry and Empire, 124–52; and Hartnack, C., Psychoanalysis in India (New Delhi, 2001)Google Scholar.

4 Jay, M., The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950 (London, 1973), xxviii–xxixGoogle Scholar.

5 See, for example, Jay's discussion of Marxism in ibid., 92.

6 Nakamura, H. and Leggett, T., A History of Early Vedānta Philosophy (Delhi, 1990), 10–12Google Scholar.

7 See Easwaran, E., “Introduction”, in Easwaran, , ed., The Bhagavad-Gita (Tomales, CA, 2007), 17Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., 48.

9 Kapila, S. and Devji, F., “The Bhagavad Gita and Modern Thought: Introduction”, MIH 7/2 (2010), 269–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Bayly, C., “India, the Bhagavad Gita and the World,” MIH 7/2 (2010), 275–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Sinka, M., “Corrigibility, Allegory and Universality: A History of the Gita's Transnational Reception, 1785–1945”, MIH 7/2 (2010), 297–317Google Scholar.

10 Kapila and Devji, “Introduction”, 272.

11 While this paper explores the development of Indian psychology, it is important to recognize the body of work arguing that early Indian psychology was derivative (see, for example, Nandy, A., “The Non-paradigmatic Crisis in Indian Psychology: Reflections on a Recipient Culture Science”, IJP 49/1 (1974), 1–20, 7Google Scholar.

12 See, for example, Bose, S. and Jalal, A., Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy (New York, 2004), 64–6Google Scholar.

13 Sartori, A., “Beyond Culture-Contact and Colonial Discourse: ‘Germanism’ in Colonial Bengal”, MIH 4/1 (2007), 91–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Sartori, A., Bengal in Global Concept History (Chicago, 2008), 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 C. Bayly, “South Asian Liberalism under Strain, c.1900–1940”, 2007 Wiles lecture series, Queen's University Belfast, 18 May 2007.

16 Bayly, C., “Afterword”, MIH 4IV/1 (2007), 163–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Arnold, D., Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India, The New Cambridge History of India, vol. 3, part 5 (Cambridge, 2000), 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Arnold, Science, Technology and Medicine, 2. For a wider study of the Indian pursuit of decolonization and tensions between history, modernity and nationhood see Duara, P.'s chapter “The Critique of Modernity in India and China”, in Chung, Tan, ed., Across the Himalayan Gap: An Indian Quest for Understanding China (New Delhi, 1998)Google Scholar.

19 wa Thiong'o, Ngugi, Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature (Nairobi, 1981)Google Scholar. S. Kapila, “Godless Freud”, 126.

20 See, for example, ibid.; and A. Nandy's chapter on Bose in Nandy, A., The Savage Freud and Other Essays on Possible and Retrievable Selves (New Delhi, 1995), 81–144Google Scholar.

21 Sarkar, B., “The Making of Naren Sengupta”, IJP 19/3–4 (1944), 125–34, 19Google Scholar.

22 N. N. Sengupta, “Mr. Rabindranath Tagore”, Harvard Crimson, 17 Feb. 1913, available at www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=171257.

23 C. Hartnack, Psychoanalysis in India, 92.

24 “Foreword”, IJP 1/1 (1926).

25 Bose, G., “Psychology”, in Prashad, B., ed., The Progress of Science in India in the Past Twenty-Five Years (Calcutta, 1938), 337Google Scholar.

26 Ibid.

27 “Notes and Comments”, IJP 20/1–4 (1945), 119.

28 Cattell, J. M., Ninth International Congress of Psychology: Proceedings and Papers (Princeton, 1930), 4Google Scholar.

29 Sastry, N. S. N., “Growth of Psychology in India”, IJP 7/1 (1932), 1–40, 34Google Scholar.

30 Ibid.

31 Banerji, M. N., “Preface”, IJP 7/3–4 (1932)Google Scholar.

32 Chakrabarty, D., Provincialising Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ, 2000), 7–10Google Scholar.

33 I borrow the concept of coevalness from Fabian, J., Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object (New York, 1983)Google Scholar, chaps. 1 and 2.

34 Prakash, G., Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India (Princeton, 1999), 3–11Google Scholar.

35 Ibid., 118. While this essay is focused more specifically on the doctrinal development of the discipline of psychology, Prakash's book offers useful insight into the broader scientific context; the myriad pressure points between science, politics and nationalism; and the tensions between conceptualizations of Indian sciences and the undertones of entrenched orientalism.

36 Ibid., 3.

37 For a detailed study of the reappropriation of Vedic thought in nineteenth-century India see Hatcher's, B. 2007 book Bourgeois Hinduism, or Faith of the Modern Vedantists (New York, 2007)Google Scholar.

38 Bose, S., “The Spirit and Form of an Ethical Polity: A Meditation on Aurobindo's Thought”, MIH 4/1 (2007), 129–44, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Sartori, “Germanism”, 91.

40 Kapila, “Godless Freud”, 125–6.

41 Sastry, “Growth of Psychology”, 33.

42 Ibid.

43 Ibid., 39.

44 Bose, G., “The Psychological Outlook in Hindu Philosophy”, IJP 5/3–4 (1930), 119–47, 120Google Scholar.

45 Ibid., 136.

46 Banerji, M. N., “Applied Psychology”, IJP 9/1 (1934), 1–18, 2Google Scholar.

47 Ibid., 4.

48 Chatterjee, P., Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World (London, 1986), 51Google Scholar.

49 Datta, A., “Obituary for Mr. Manmatha Nath Banerji”, IJP 21/1 (1946), 94Google Scholar.

50 Banerji, “Applied Psychology”, 4, my italics.

51 Ibid., 4.

52 Ghosh, B. C., “Theories and Levels of Consciousness”, IJP 11/1–2 (1936), 87–100Google Scholar.

53 Ibid., 100.

54 Sastry, “Growth of Psychology”, 32–3.

55 Ibid., 40.

56 For an analysis of the scientificization of swaraj for nationalist discourse see Kapila, S., “Self, Spencer and Swaraj: Nationalist Thought and Critiques of Liberalism, 1890–1920”, MIH 4/1 (2007), 109–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Gandhi, M. K., “Hind Swaraj”, in Hind Swaraj and Other Writings, ed. Parel, A. (Cambridge, 1997), 116–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Goswami, M., Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space (Chicago, 2004), 254–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Gandhi, “Hind Swaraj”.

60 Sen, I., “On the Urge for Wholeness”, IJP 21/1 (1947), 1–31, 31Google Scholar.

61 Ibid., 30.

62 R. Sharma, “New Light on Dream Psychology”, in Cattell, Ninth International Congress, 379–80.

63 Another key figure in the development of Indian experimental psychology, Owen Berkeley-Hill was born in England in 1879 and joined the Indian Medical Service in 1907. Berkeley-Hill later served as superintendent of the European Asylum in Ranchi. “Owen Berkeley-Hill 1879–1944”, International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 25 (1944), 177.

64 “The Indian Psychological Association First Annual Congress”, IJP 1/2 (1926), 133.

65 Mitra, S. C., “History of the Psychology Department of the University of Calcutta”, IJP 12/3 (1937), 151–62, 159Google Scholar.

66 “Annual Report”, IJP 6/2–3 (1931), 49–50.

67 This essay focuses on Indian psychology in The Statesman as a case study of how psychology permeated print media; however, psychology also played a prominent role in other media, such as in the Theosophical journal Aryan Path and in Congress Socialist, the All-India Congress Socialist Party's paper.

68 “How Psychology Can Help Mankind”, The Statesman, 8 Jan. 1941.

69 “Scientists Aid to Assist Ryots”, The Statesman, 7 Jan. 1936.

70 “New Books Reviewed: Comparative Religions”, The Statesman, 19 Jan. 1935.

71 Sengupta, N. N., “Mental Traits of Beggars”, in Kumarappa, J. M., ed., Our Beggar Problem (Bombay, 1945), 37–9Google Scholar.

72 Banerji, “Applied Psychology”, 1.

73 Datta, A., “Mr. Manmatha Nath. Banerji”, IJP 21/1–4 (1946), 94–5Google Scholar.

74 Mitra, “History”, 159.

75 Ibid.

76 “Report on the Working of the Applied Section of the Department of Psychology Calcutta University” (special section), IJP 17 (1942), 24–5.

77 “Notes and Comments”, IJP 20/1–4 (1945), 119.

78 Ibid.

79 Ibid.

80 “Notes and Comments”, IJP 19/3–4 (1944), 222.

81 Murphy, G., “Introduction”, in Ram, P. and Murphy, G., ed., A UNESCO Study of Social Tensions in Aligarh 1950–1951 (Aligarh, 1954), viiGoogle Scholar.

82 See Dalal, Ajit's “A Journey back to the Roots: Psychology in India”, in Matthijs Cornelissen, R. M., Misra, Girishwar and Varma, Suneet, eds., Psychology in India, vol. 1 (New Delhi, 2011), 27–57Google Scholar.