Abstract
A deregulation of medicines is currently underway in the U.K. and France. Emergency contraception has become available over the counter in pharmacies in both countries. This might constitute a further step in the liberalisation of contraception, something which has always received support from women’s organisations and from women themselves. It also forms part of a current revolution in patient behaviour. This article examines the law governing the deregulation of emergency contraception in the U.K. and France and assesses how far this might serve to empower women to take control of their own reproductive health care provision. It considers some of the British feminist critiques of the limit to patient’s autonomy put forward by Sheldon(1998), Foster (1998), and Murphy (1998).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
All-Party Pharmacy Group, The Supply of Emergency Contraception through Community Pharmacies: A Report to Health Ministers (February 2000).
Charles, C.,Gafni, A. &Whelan, T., “Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What does it mean? (Or it Takes at Least Two to Tango)” Social Science and Medicine 44/5 (1997), 681-692.
Crown Report, Report on the Supply and Administration of Medicines under Group Protocols H.S.C. 1998/ 051 (1998).
Dekeuwer-Defossé, F., Dictionnaire juridique: droits des femmes (Dalloz, 1985).
Dhavernas, O., Droits des Femmes, pouvoir des hommes (Paris: Seuil, 1978).
Duchen, C., Feminism in France (London: Routledge, 1986).
Firestone, S., The Dialectics of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution (New York: Bantam Books, 1971).
Foster, P.,“Informed Consent in Practice”, in Sheldon and Thomson, infra, pp. 53-67.
Furedi, A., “In the U.K, B.P.A.S. Clients not Interested in Advance Prescriptions for EC”, The Emergency Contraceptive Newsletter 5/2 (2000a), 12.
Furedi, A., “Pharmacists in Great Britain Continue to Distribute E.C.”, The Emergency Contraceptive Newsletter 5/2 (2000b), 20.
General Medical Council (June 1990), Professional Conduct: Fitness to Practice [Bluebook].
General Medical Council (October 1995), Duties of a Doctor.
Hoffman, J. &Wilkes, M., “Direct to Consumer Advertising: an Idea Whose Time Should Not Come”, British Medical Journal 318 (1999), 1301-1302.
Jenson, J., “Struggling for Identity: The Women' Movement and the State in Western Europe”, West European Politics 8/4 (October 1985), 5-18.
Keywood, K., “Hobson' Choice: Reproductive Choices for Women with Learning Disabilities”, Medical Law 17 (1998), 149.
Kosunen, E.,Vikat, A.,Rimplela, M.,Rimpela, A. &Huhtala, H., “Questionnaire Study of Use of Emergency Contraception among Teenagers”, British Medical Journal 319 (1999), 91.
Latham, M., Regulating Reproduction: a Century of Conflict in Britain and France (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002, forthcoming).
Leathard A., The Fight for Family Planning: The Development of Family Planning Services in Britain 1921-1974 (Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1980).
McHale, J.,Fox, M. &Murphy, J., Health Care Law: Text, Cases and Materials (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1997).
Mémeteau, G., “Le Droit Médical de la Famille”, in Le droit non-civil de la famille, ed. Jean Carbonnier (Paris: P.U.F., 1983).
Mouvement Français pour le Planning Familial, D'une revolte à une lutte: 25 ans d'histoire du planning familial (Paris: Editions Tiercé, 1983).
Mullan, K., “Implications of Refusal to Sell Post-Coital Contraception”, The Pharmaceutical Journal 252 (August 6, 1994).
Mullan, K., Blackstone' Pharmacy Law and Practice (London: Blackstone Press, 2000), p. 295.
Murphy, T., “Health Confidentiality in the Age of Talk”, in Sheldon and Thomson, infra, pp. 155-171.
Paintin, D., Twenty Questions about Emergency Contraception-Answered (Birth Control Trust, March 1998).
Rich, A., “Anger and Tenderness: the Experience of Motherhood”, in The Changing Experience of Women, ed. Elisabeth Whitelegg (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1982).
Sheldon, S. &Thomson, M. (eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Law (London: Cavendish, 1998).
Sheldon, S., “ 'A Responsible Body of Medical Men Skilled in that Particular Art ...': Rethinking the Bolam Test”, in Sheldon and Thomson, infra, pp. 15-31.
Steinbock, B., “The Concept of Coercion and Long-Term Contraceptives”, in Coerced Contraception? Moral and Policy Challenges of Long Acting Birth Control, eds. E. Moskowitz &B. Jennings (Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 1996).
Ullman, A. (H.R.A. Pharma France), “EC Again Available Through Schools in France”, The Emergency Contraceptive Newsletter 5/2 (2000), 12.
Vuckovic, N. &Nichter, M., “Changing Patterns of Pharmaceutical Practice in the United States”, Social Science and Medicine 44/9 (1997), 1285-1302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latham, M. Deregulation and Emergency Contraception: A Way Forward for Women's Health Care?. Feminist Legal Studies 9, 221–246 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012568229244
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012568229244