Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to examine the ethical decision-making (EDM) model proposed by Schwartz (J Bus Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8, 2016), where we consider the factors of non-rationality and aspects that affect ethical judgments of auditors to make the decision to blow the whistle. In this paper, we argue that the intention of whistleblowing depends on ethical awareness (EAW) and ethical judgment (EJW) as well as there is a mediation–moderation due to emotion (EMT) and perceived moral intensity (PMI) of auditors. Data were collected using an online survey with 162 external auditors who worked on audit firms in Indonesia as well as 173 internal auditors working in the manufacturing and financial services. The result of multigroup analysis shows that emotion (EMT) can mediate the relationship between EAW and EJW. The nature of this relationship is more complex and then tested by adding moderating variables using consistent partial least squares approach. We found that EMT and PMI can improve the relationship between ethical judgments and whistleblowing intentions. These findings indicate that internal auditors are more likely to blow the whistle than external auditors; and reporting wrongdoing internally and anonymously are the preferred way of professional accountants to blow the whistle in Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Jubb (2000) gives a detailed explanation of the roles of auditors as whistleblowers.

  2. Miceli et al. (2014) provide a detailed distinction between internal and external whistleblowers. In this paper, we use the term external whistleblower compared to the “bell-ringers” proposed by them to be more familiar.

  3. This study provides empirical evidence of EDM theoretical models developed by Schwartz (2016). Although not all of the variables considered, this provides sufficient preliminary evidence.

  4. Shawver et al. (2015) combine the two groups into a single dataset. This makes the results of the analysis to become inaccurate and biased.

  5. There is a similarity between the model of Trevino (1986) and the model of Ferrell and Gresham (1985), which consider individual and situational factors. The difference is the role of both, one as a predictor and the other as moderator.

  6. See Leys and Vandekerckhove (2014) for an explanation of the rights and duties of a whistleblower for some type of wrongdoings.

  7. Alleyne et al. (2016) and Latan et al. (2016) have used the moral intensity as a moderating variable in research related to the whistlwblowing intentions.

  8. Social desirability response bias is broadly understood as the tendency of individuals to deny socially undesirable traits and behaviors and to admit to socially desirable ones.

  9. The use of scenarios is more effective to give stimuli to the auditor in making ethical decisions when faced with certain situations.

  10. Dijkstra and Henseler (2015) gives a detailed explanation related to PLSc.

  11. Conceptually, measurement invariance expresses the idea that the measurement properties of X in relation to the target latent trait Wt are the same across populations.

  12. Cepeda et al. (2018) proposes to use a spreadsheet to calculate the indirect effects.

  13. Lehnert et al. (2015) were surprised only two studies using qualitative approach in their meta-analysis study of the EDM.

References

  • Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2016). The moderating role of perceived organisational support in breaking the silence of public accountants. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2946-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. The British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambeault, D. S., & Webber, S. (2015). Whistleblowing 101. The CPA Journal, 85(7), 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D. F., Dorminey, J. W., Neidermeyer, A. A., & Neidermeyer, P. E. (2013). Internal and external auditor ethical decision-making. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(4), 300–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., MacDougall, A. E., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Mental models and ethical decision making: The mediating role of sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beu, D. S., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2003). Ethical decision-making: A multidimensional construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1), 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 557–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchan, H. F. (2005). Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: An extension of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagle, J. A. B., & Baucus, M. S. (2006). Case studies of ethics scandals: Effects on ethical perceptions of finance students. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cepeda, G., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2018). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: An illustrative example. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. Y. S., & Leung, P. (2006). The effects of accounting students’ ethical reasoning and personal factors on their ethical sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 436–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. K. (2002). Ethical judgement, locus of control, and whistleblowing intention: A case study of mainland Chinese MBA students. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(9), 581–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, L. H., & Shawver, T. (2011). Moral intensity and intentions of accounting professionals to whistleblow internally. Journal of Forensic Studies in Accounting and Business, 3(1), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, S., Helton-Fauth, W., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 221–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culiberg, B., & Mihelic, K. K. (2016). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3237-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. B. (2006). Are audit-related ethical decisions dependent upon mood? Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Accounting and the Public Interest, 9(1), 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). PLS’ janus face—Response to professor Rigdon’s ‘rethinking partial least squares modeling: In praise of simple methods’. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi, B. P., Petrick, J. A., & Young, S. A. (2005). Managerial role motivation and role-related ethical orientation in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, R., Street, M. D., & Haines, D. (2008). The influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment, moral obligation, and moral intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 387–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henik, E. (2015). Understanding whistle-blowing: A set-theoretic approach. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 442–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Updated guidelines. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing Measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollings, J. (2013). Let the story go: The role of emotion in the decision-making process of the reluctant, vulnerable witness or whistle-blower. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jubb, P. B. (2000). Auditors as whistleblowers. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latan, H., & Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial least squares: Concepts, techniques and application using program SmartPLS 3.0 (2nd ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2016). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3318-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015). Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: Boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in the perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, J., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2014). Whistleblowing duties. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook of whistleblowing research (pp. 115–132). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liyanarachchi, G. A., & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistle-blowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). Whistle while you work: Whistleblowing in the presence of competing incentives and pressures. Accounting Perspectives, 13(4), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2014a). Section 45 of the auditing profession act: Blowing the whistle for audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2014b). Whistle-blowing by external auditors in South Africa: Enclosure, efficient bodies and disciplinary power. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 834–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroun, W., & Gowar, C. (2013). South African auditors blowing the whistle without protection: A challenge for trust and legitimacy. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, P. A., & Azevedo-Pereira, J. (2009). Ethical ideology and ethical judgments in the Portuguese accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, L. (2018). Applying multigroup-analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M. P., Dreyfus, S., & Near, J. P. (2014). Outsider whistleblowers: Conceptualizing and distinguishing “bell-ringing” behavior. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 71–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 213–263). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, P., & Ngau, O. (2014). Whistleblowing: A critical philosophical analysis of the component moral decisions of the act and some new perspectives on its moral significance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Oktem, M. K., & Omurgonulsen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(4), 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. (1994). Whistle-blowing as an internal control mechanism: Individual and organizational considerations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(2), 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (2013). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 173–190). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., MacDonald, J., & Crawford, D. (2011). The Dodd-Frank wall street reform and consumer protection act of 2010. The CPA Journal, 81(3), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (2013). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 45–67). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldan, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015), “SmartPLS 3.” Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.

  • Rottig, D., Koufteros, X., & Umphress, E. (2011). Formal infrastructure and ethical decision making: An empirical investigation and implications for supply management. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 163–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Measurement and research methods in international marketing: Advances in international marketing (Vol. 22, pp. 195–218). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Schlittgen, R., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2016). Segmentation of PLS path models by iterative reweighted regressions. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4583–4592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, J. J., Johnson, D. A., Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(3), 75–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. E., Morris, R. E., & Ketchand, A. A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical decisions. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shawver, T. J., Clements, L. H., & Sennetti, J. T. (2015). How does moral intensity impact the moral judgments and whistleblowing intentions of professional accountants? In C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (Vol. 19, pp. 27–60). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgements: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J. J., Garg, N., Govind, R., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Anger strays, fear refrains: The differential effect of negative emotions on consumers’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3248-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (forthcoming).

  • Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S., & Willems, K. (2018). Dealing with non-linearity in importance performance-map analysis (IPMA): An integrative framework in a PLS-SEM context. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2004). Ethical reasoning in an equitable relief innocent spouse context. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, S., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issue importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerckhove, W., & Lewis, D. (2012). The content of whistleblowing procedures: A critical review of recent official guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, S., & Archambeault, D. S. (2015). Whistleblowing: Not so simple for accountants. The CPA Journal, 85(8), 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y.-M. (2015). Comparative analysis of Jones’ and Kelley’s ethical decision-making models. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 573–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hengky Latan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

We aware of the contents and consent to the use of our names as an author of manuscript entitled “Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.”

Additional information

We thank two anonymous reviewers, Steven Dellaportas (editor) for their valuable comments on prior versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J. & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B. Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. J Bus Ethics 155, 289–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2

Keywords

Navigation