Abstract
This study aims to examine the ethical decision-making (EDM) model proposed by Schwartz (J Bus Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2886-8, 2016), where we consider the factors of non-rationality and aspects that affect ethical judgments of auditors to make the decision to blow the whistle. In this paper, we argue that the intention of whistleblowing depends on ethical awareness (EAW) and ethical judgment (EJW) as well as there is a mediation–moderation due to emotion (EMT) and perceived moral intensity (PMI) of auditors. Data were collected using an online survey with 162 external auditors who worked on audit firms in Indonesia as well as 173 internal auditors working in the manufacturing and financial services. The result of multigroup analysis shows that emotion (EMT) can mediate the relationship between EAW and EJW. The nature of this relationship is more complex and then tested by adding moderating variables using consistent partial least squares approach. We found that EMT and PMI can improve the relationship between ethical judgments and whistleblowing intentions. These findings indicate that internal auditors are more likely to blow the whistle than external auditors; and reporting wrongdoing internally and anonymously are the preferred way of professional accountants to blow the whistle in Indonesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Jubb (2000) gives a detailed explanation of the roles of auditors as whistleblowers.
Miceli et al. (2014) provide a detailed distinction between internal and external whistleblowers. In this paper, we use the term external whistleblower compared to the “bell-ringers” proposed by them to be more familiar.
This study provides empirical evidence of EDM theoretical models developed by Schwartz (2016). Although not all of the variables considered, this provides sufficient preliminary evidence.
Shawver et al. (2015) combine the two groups into a single dataset. This makes the results of the analysis to become inaccurate and biased.
See Leys and Vandekerckhove (2014) for an explanation of the rights and duties of a whistleblower for some type of wrongdoings.
Social desirability response bias is broadly understood as the tendency of individuals to deny socially undesirable traits and behaviors and to admit to socially desirable ones.
The use of scenarios is more effective to give stimuli to the auditor in making ethical decisions when faced with certain situations.
Dijkstra and Henseler (2015) gives a detailed explanation related to PLSc.
Conceptually, measurement invariance expresses the idea that the measurement properties of X in relation to the target latent trait Wt are the same across populations.
Cepeda et al. (2018) proposes to use a spreadsheet to calculate the indirect effects.
Lehnert et al. (2015) were surprised only two studies using qualitative approach in their meta-analysis study of the EDM.
References
Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2016). The moderating role of perceived organisational support in breaking the silence of public accountants. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2946-0.
Alleyne, P., Hudaib, M., & Pike, R. (2013). Towards a conceptual model of whistle-blowing intentions among external auditors. The British Accounting Review, 45(1), 10–23.
Archambeault, D. S., & Webber, S. (2015). Whistleblowing 101. The CPA Journal, 85(7), 62–68.
Arnold, D. F., Dorminey, J. W., Neidermeyer, A. A., & Neidermeyer, P. E. (2013). Internal and external auditor ethical decision-making. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(4), 300–322.
Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., MacDougall, A. E., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Mental models and ethical decision making: The mediating role of sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 133–144.
Beu, D. S., Buckley, M. R., & Harvey, M. G. (2003). Ethical decision-making: A multidimensional construct. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(1), 88–107.
Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. (2008). The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 557–571.
Buchan, H. F. (2005). Ethical decision making in the public accounting profession: An extension of Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 165–181.
Butterfield, K. D., Trevino, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53(7), 981–1018.
Cagle, J. A. B., & Baucus, M. S. (2006). Case studies of ethics scandals: Effects on ethical perceptions of finance students. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 213–229.
Cepeda, G., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2018). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: An illustrative example. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.
Chan, S. Y. S., & Leung, P. (2006). The effects of accounting students’ ethical reasoning and personal factors on their ethical sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(4), 436–457.
Chiu, R. K. (2002). Ethical judgement, locus of control, and whistleblowing intention: A case study of mainland Chinese MBA students. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(9), 581–587.
Chiu, R. K. (2003). Ethical judgment and whistleblowing intention: Examining the moderating role of locus of control. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 65–74.
Clements, L. H., & Shawver, T. (2011). Moral intensity and intentions of accounting professionals to whistleblow internally. Journal of Forensic Studies in Accounting and Business, 3(1), 67–82.
Connelly, S., Helton-Fauth, W., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). A managerial in-basket study of the impact of trait emotions on ethical choice. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 245–267.
Craft, J. L. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 221–259.
Culiberg, B., & Mihelic, K. K. (2016). The evolution of whistleblowing studies: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3237-0.
Curtis, M. B. (2006). Are audit-related ethical decisions dependent upon mood? Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 191–209.
Curtis, M. B., & Taylor, E. Z. (2009). Whistleblowing in public accounting: Influence of identity disclosure, situational context, and personal characteristics. Accounting and the Public Interest, 9(1), 191–220.
Dijkstra, T. K. (2014). PLS’ janus face—Response to professor Rigdon’s ‘rethinking partial least squares modeling: In praise of simple methods’. Long Range Planning, 47(3), 146–153.
Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Ebrahimi, B. P., Petrick, J. A., & Young, S. A. (2005). Managerial role motivation and role-related ethical orientation in Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(1), 29–45.
Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96.
Haines, R., Street, M. D., & Haines, D. (2008). The influence of perceived importance of an ethical issue on moral judgment, moral obligation, and moral intent. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 387–399.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
Henik, E. (2008). Mad as hell or scared stiff? The effects of value conflict and emotions on potential whistle-blowers. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 111–119.
Henik, E. (2015). Understanding whistle-blowing: A set-theoretic approach. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 442–450.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Updated guidelines. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing Measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431.
Hollings, J. (2013). Let the story go: The role of emotion in the decision-making process of the reluctant, vulnerable witness or whistle-blower. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 501–512.
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.
Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2006). The general theory of marketing ethics: A revision and three questions. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(2), 143–153.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
Jubb, P. B. (2000). Auditors as whistleblowers. International Journal of Auditing, 4, 153–167.
Kaplan, S. E., & Whitecotton, S. M. (2001). An examination of auditors’ reporting intentions when another auditor is offered client employment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 45–63.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
Latan, H., & Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial least squares: Concepts, techniques and application using program SmartPLS 3.0 (2nd ed.). Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.
Latan, H., Ringle, C. M., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2016). Whistleblowing intentions among public accountants in Indonesia: Testing for the moderation effects. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3318-0.
Lehnert, K., Park, Y.-H., & Singh, N. (2015). Research note and review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: Boundary conditions and extensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 195–219.
Leitsch, D. L. (2004). Differences in the perceptions of moral intensity in the moral decision process: An empirical examination of accounting students. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(3), 313–323.
Leys, J., & Vandekerckhove, W. (2014). Whistleblowing duties. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook of whistleblowing research (pp. 115–132). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Liyanarachchi, G. A., & Newdick, C. (2009). The impact of moral reasoning and retaliation on whistle-blowing: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 37–57.
MacGregor, J., & Stuebs, M. (2014). Whistle while you work: Whistleblowing in the presence of competing incentives and pressures. Accounting Perspectives, 13(4), 309–324.
Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2014a). Section 45 of the auditing profession act: Blowing the whistle for audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 46(3), 248–263.
Maroun, W., & Atkins, J. (2014b). Whistle-blowing by external auditors in South Africa: Enclosure, efficient bodies and disciplinary power. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(5), 834–862.
Maroun, W., & Gowar, C. (2013). South African auditors blowing the whistle without protection: A challenge for trust and legitimacy. International Journal of Auditing, 17(2), 177–189.
Marques, P. A., & Azevedo-Pereira, J. (2009). Ethical ideology and ethical judgments in the Portuguese accounting profession. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 227–242.
Matthews, L. (2018). Applying multigroup-analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.
McMahon, J. M., & Harvey, R. J. (2007). The effect of moral intensity on ethical judgment. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(4), 335–357.
Miceli, M. P., Dreyfus, S., & Near, J. P. (2014). Outsider whistleblowers: Conceptualizing and distinguishing “bell-ringing” behavior. In A. J. Brown, D. Lewis, R. Moberly, & W. Vandekerckhove (Eds.), International handbook on whistleblowing research (pp. 71–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
O’Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2013). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 213–263). New York: Springer.
O’Sullivan, P., & Ngau, O. (2014). Whistleblowing: A critical philosophical analysis of the component moral decisions of the act and some new perspectives on its moral significance. Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(4), 401–415.
Park, H., Blenkinsopp, J., Oktem, M. K., & Omurgonulsen, U. (2008). Cultural orientation and attitudes toward different forms of whistleblowing: A comparison of South Korea, Turkey, and the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 929–939.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(4), 539–569.
Ponemon, L. A. (1994). Whistle-blowing as an internal control mechanism: Individual and organizational considerations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(2), 118–130.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (2013). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 173–190). New York: Springer.
Rao, H., MacDonald, J., & Crawford, D. (2011). The Dodd-Frank wall street reform and consumer protection act of 2010. The CPA Journal, 81(3), 15–25.
Reidenbach, R. E., & Robin, D. P. (2013). Toward the development of a multidimensional scale for improving evaluations of business ethics. In A. C. Michalos & D. C. Poff (Eds.), Citation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics: Celebrating the first thirty years of publication (pp. 45–67). New York: Springer.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldan, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597.
Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605.
Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015), “SmartPLS 3.” Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com.
Rottig, D., Koufteros, X., & Umphress, E. (2011). Formal infrastructure and ethical decision making: An empirical investigation and implications for supply management. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 163–204.
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In M. Sarstedt, M. Schwaiger & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Measurement and research methods in international marketing: Advances in international marketing (Vol. 22, pp. 195–218). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Schlittgen, R., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Becker, J.-M. (2016). Segmentation of PLS path models by iterative reweighted regressions. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4583–4592.
Schultz, J. J., Johnson, D. A., Morris, D., & Dyrnes, S. (1993). An investigation of the reporting of questionable acts in an international setting. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(3), 75–103.
Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Ethical decision-making theory: An integrated approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(4), 755–776.
Shafer, W. E., Morris, R. E., & Ketchand, A. A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors’ ethical decisions. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 254–277.
Shawver, T. J., Clements, L. H., & Sennetti, J. T. (2015). How does moral intensity impact the moral judgments and whistleblowing intentions of professional accountants? In C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Research on professional responsibility and ethics in accounting (Vol. 19, pp. 27–60). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Singer, M., Mitchell, S., & Turner, J. (1998). Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgements: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(5), 527–541.
Singh, J. J., Garg, N., Govind, R., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Anger strays, fear refrains: The differential effect of negative emotions on consumers’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3248-x.
Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Kraft, K. L. (1996). Moral intensity and ethical of marketing professionals. Journal of Business Research, 36, 245–255.
Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance: Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (forthcoming).
Streukens, S., Leroi-Werelds, S., & Willems, K. (2018). Dealing with non-linearity in importance performance-map analysis (IPMA): An integrative framework in a PLS-SEM context. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. New York: Springer.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. The Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2004). Ethical reasoning in an equitable relief innocent spouse context. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 325–339.
Valentine, S., & Hollingworth, D. (2012). Moral intensity, issue importance, and ethical reasoning in operations situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 509–523.
Vandekerckhove, W., & Lewis, D. (2012). The content of whistleblowing procedures: A critical review of recent official guidelines. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 253–264.
Webber, S., & Archambeault, D. S. (2015). Whistleblowing: Not so simple for accountants. The CPA Journal, 85(8), 62–68.
Yu, Y.-M. (2015). Comparative analysis of Jones’ and Kelley’s ethical decision-making models. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 573–583.
Zhang, J., Chiu, R., & Wei, L. (2009). Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: Empirical evidence and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 25–41.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
We aware of the contents and consent to the use of our names as an author of manuscript entitled “Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.”
Additional information
We thank two anonymous reviewers, Steven Dellaportas (editor) for their valuable comments on prior versions of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latan, H., Chiappetta Jabbour, C.J. & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B. Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. J Bus Ethics 155, 289–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3534-2